Cases

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Bowles v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 2013 IL App (4th) 121072 Appellate Court VIRGINIA BOWLES, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Caption Estate of Jerald Bowles, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OWENS- ILLINOIS, INC., and JOHN CRANE, INC., Defendants-Appellees, and PN

290 F.Supp.2d 153 (2003) UNITED STATES of America v. Jonathan J. POLLARD, Defendant. No. CR.86-2027 TFH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 12, 2003. *154 Jonathan J. Pollard, Butner, NC, Counsel for Defendant Pollard. Eliot Lauer, Esq., Jacques Semmelman, Esq., New York, NY, Government Counsel.</

955 So.2d 859 (2005) Shermeker POLLARD and Trellvion Gaines, a Minor, by and Through His Natural Mother, Legal Guardian, and Next Friend, Shermeker Pollard, Appellants v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, Appellee. No. 2003-CA-02030-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. September 6, 2005. Rehearing Denied April 18, 2006. *860</

955 So.2d 764 (2007) Shermeker POLLARD and Trellvion Gaines, A Minor, by and through his Natural Mother, Legal Guardian, and Next Friend, Shermeker Pollard v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY. No. 2003-CT-02030-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. February 15, 2007. Rehearing Denied May 24, 2007. *765 Michael Casano, John

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-CT-02030-SCT SHERMEKER POLLARD AND TRELLVION GAINES, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS NATURAL MOTHER, LEGAL GUARDIAN, AND NEXT FRIEND, SHERMEKER POLLARD v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/2003 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAMAR PICKARD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JEFFERSON COUNTY CI

842 N.E.2d 870 (2006) Patricia FARIS, Individually and Personal Representative of the Estate of John Faris, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. AC AND S, INC., et al., Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A02-0506-CV-494. Court of Appeals of Indiana. February 21, 2006. Rehearing Denied May 1, 2006. *871 Linda George, W. Russell Sipes

OPINION BAKER, Judge. Appellant-plaintiff Dianne McCorkle (McCorkle), individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Phillip McCorkle, appeals from the trial court's grant of the motion to dismiss and final Judgment in favor of appellees-defendants AC and S, Inc., et al. (Appellees), in her action regarding personal injuries to Phillip caused by asbestos. For more background, see our companion de

SMITH, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent.. I. In Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Company, 445 S.W.2d 362 (Mo.1969) our Supreme Court adopted 2 Restatement, Law of Torts, Second, Sec. 402A dealing with strict liability for products. The court identified three bases for the adoption of that section. The first was a policy matter identified in G

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. This case arises out of a software development and license agreement between Plaintiff Superior Edge, Inc. (“SEI”) and Defendant Monsanto Company (“Monsanto”). Pursuant to the agreement, SEI was to develop software for Monsanto to assist in Monsanto’s seed sales initiati

LAMAR, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. In this toxic-tort case,1 Rebekah Angle asserts various state-law claims for injuries she suffered from 1984 to 2001. Finding these claims time-barred, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Defendants. Angle has timely appealed to this Court, asserting two theories in support of her argument that her claims are not time-barred: (1) the three-ye

278 S.C. 420 (1982) 297 S.E.2d 638 Ira ROSENTHAL, Appellant, v. UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Fibreboard Corporation, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., The Celotex Corporation, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Keene Corporation, Owens-Illinois, Inc., GAF Corporation, Amatex Corporation, Johns-Manville Corporation, Combustion Engineering, Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, Respondents.

80 F.3d 777 1996 A.M.C. 1957, 64 USLW 2676, 44Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 55,Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 14,548 Grace A. HOLBROOK, Administratrix of the Estate of John P. Holbrookv.LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO., INC.; Marine Transport LinesInc.; Puerto Rico Marine Mgmt., Inc.; Sea-LandService, Inc.; Second Shipmor Associatesv.The BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY; Combustion Engineering, Inc.;Foster-W

988 A.2d 511 (2010) 190 Md. App. 217 JOHN CRANE, INC. v. John LINKUS, Personal Representative of the Estate of George J. Linkus, Sr. No. 959, September Term, 2008. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 1, 2010. *513 Michael A. Pollard (John H. Ebner, Baker & McKenzie, LLP on the brief, of Chic

(2008) The MILTON H. GREENE ARCHIVES, INC., Plaintiff, v. CMG WORLDWIDE, INC., an Indiana Corporation, and Marilyn Monroe, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Anna Strasberg, an individual, Defendants. And Consolidated Actions. No. CV 05-02200 MMM (MCx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 31, 2008. AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDAN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2008-CA-02045-SCT REBEKAH ANGLE v. KOPPERS, INC. f/k/a KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC., AND ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, BEAZER EAST, INC., AND THREE RIVERS MANAGEMENT, INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/28/2008 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOSEPH H. LOPER, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: GRENADA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ELIZABETH UNGER CARLYLE

899 A.2d 879 (2006) 169 Md. App. 1 JOHN CRANE, INC., et al. v. David PULLER, Individually, etc., et al. No. 1772, Sept. Term, 2004. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 31, 2006. *883 Michelle D. Siri (Robert T. Connor, Thomas P. Bermier, Segal, McCambridge, Singer & Mahoney, Ltd., on the brief),

Gants, Ralph D., J. The plaintiffs, Marcia Rhodes, Harold Rhodes, and Rebecca Rhodes (collectively, “the Rhodeses”), have filed this action against the defendants AIG Domestic Claims, Inc., formerly known as AIG Technical Services (“AIGDC”), National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”), and Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”), alleging that these insurers violated G.L.c. 176D, §3(9)(f) (and,