Cases

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIY. P. 12(b)(1) (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) (3) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE NEW ARGUMENTS AND EVIDENCE IN DEFENDANT’S REPLY BRIEF [ECF Nos. 49, 50.]

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION L. SCOTT COOGLER, District Judge. I. Introduction In the above-entitled action, Horace Jeffrey Allen (“Plaintiff”) claims his former employer, Southern Communications Services, Inc., doing business as SouthernLINC Wireless (“SouthernLINC”), retaliated against him for filing complaints in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U

Alexander, J., On May 12, 1966, the incorporators of Community Legal Services, Inc., made application to this court for a charter under the provisions of the Nonprofit Corporation Law of May 5, 1933, P. L. 289, as amended, 15 PS §7001. Upon request of the incorporators, the court waived the appointment of a master and decided itself to sit and hear the application. Two lawyers, members of the bar, appeared pro se as objectors. Af

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Those who would enjoin speech concerning a matter of public interest must bear a heavy burden, see Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, 402 U.S. 415, 419, 91 S.Ct. 1575, 1577-78, 29 L.Ed.2d 1 (1971) (“heavy presumption” of unconstitutionality), more so if the speech in question concerns a labor dispute. See Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S.C. § 104(e)

960 F.Supp. 1104 (1997) HTI HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. QUORUM HEALTH GROUP, INC., River Region Medical Corporation (Formerly known as ParkView Medical Corporation), and Vicksburg Clinic, P.A., Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:96-CV-108Br(S). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Division. March 14, 1997. *1105<

Stiloski v Wingate (2025 NY Slip Op 04803) Stiloski v Wingate 2025 NY Slip Op 04803 Decided on August 27, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is u

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PUNCHBOWL, INC., a Delaware No.21-55881 corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-03010- v. SVW-MAR AJ PRESS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, OPINION Defendant-App

IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana FILED Aug 05 2025, 8:47 am Kimberly A. White, CLERK

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0205p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ LIBERTARIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, INC., │ Plain

FILED FOR PUBLICATION NOV 14 2022 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS PUNCHBOWL, INC., a Delaware No. 21-55881 corporation,

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EX REL. CITY OF BRIDGEPORT, FILED Petitioner November 5, 2018 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GA

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Gregory J. Reed, Plaintiff Below, Petitioner FILED May 20, 2016 vs) No. 15-0598 (Kanawha County 14-AA-129) RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: *1250This appeal requires us to decide several issues-including an issue of first impression in this Circuit about the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment-arising from Isaac Feldman's convictions and sentence for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Feldman invest

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1725 ___________________________ Richard Brakebill; Dorothy Herman; Della Merrick; Elvis Norquay; Ray Norquay; Lucille Vivier, on behalf of themselves, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellees,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-972 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:20-cr-00326- JFW-4 v. SHEN ZHEN NEW WORLD I, LLC, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United State

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge ' - Plaintiff Angelica Hále brings this action pro se against defendants Emporia State University (“ESU”), Gwen Alexander, David Cordle, and Jackie Vietti. Plaintiff alleges that her former employer, ESU, retaliated against her by terminating her employment because she complained about racial discrimination. She asserts a Title VII r

17‐474 Copeland v. Vance UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2017 (Argued: January 18, 2018 Decided: June 22, 2018)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER * ANALISA TORRES, United States District Judge Plaintiff, Josephine James Edwards,1 brings this class action lawsuit against Defendant, Hearst Communications, Inc., alleging violations of the Michigan Video Rental Privacy Act, H.B. 5331, 84th Leg., Reg. Sess., P.A. No. 378, § 2 (Mich. 1988) (amended 2016) (“VRPA”), and unjust enri

Katzmann, Chief Judge: *107Plaintiffs-appellants John Copeland, Pedro Perez, and Native Leather, Ltd. (collectively, "plaintiffs") appeal from a judgment against them following a bench trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, J .). Plaintiffs claim that New York's ban on gravity knives