Cases

People v Polanco (2023 NY Slip Op 04731) People v Polanco 2023 NY Slip Op 04731 Decided on September 26, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

People v Polanco (2023 NY Slip Op 04731) People v Polanco 2023 NY Slip Op 04731 Decided on September 26, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

People v Polanco (2020 NY Slip Op 04703) People v Polanco 2020 NY Slip Op 04703 Decided on August 20, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

People v Polanco-Lopez (2025 NY Slip Op 03594) People v Polanco-Lopez 2025 NY Slip Op 03594 Decided on June 11, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinio

People v Polanco (2020 NY Slip Op 07293) People v Polanco 2020 NY Slip Op 07293 Decided on December 03, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

People v Polanco (2020 NY Slip Op 07293) People v Polanco 2020 NY Slip Op 07293 Decided on December 03, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

People v Polanco (2018 NY Slip Op 04076) People v Polanco 2018 NY Slip Op 04076 Decided on June 7, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

People v Polanco (2018 NY Slip Op 01248) People v Polanco 2018 NY Slip Op 01248 Decided on February 22, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

People v Polanco (2019 NY Slip Op 06518) People v Polanco 2019 NY Slip Op 06518 Decided on September 11, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

People v Polanco (2018 NY Slip Op 03105) People v Polanco 2018 NY Slip Op 03105 Decided on May 1, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J), rendered on or about August 20, 2014, as amended, April 8, 2011, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is *627granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. Fitzgerald, J.), rendered on or about February 15, 2013, unanimously affirmed. Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assig

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered on or about July 18, 2013, unanimously affirmed. Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned co

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J), rendered on or about August 20, 2014, as amended, April 8, 2011, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is *627granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J., at suppression motions; Charles H. Solomon, J., at severance motion; Robert H. Straus, J., at jury trial and sentencing), rendered May 12, 2005, as amended May 25, 2005, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, conspiracy in the second and fourth degrees, and two counts of criminal possession of a

*407OPINION OF THE COURT Anthony J. Ferrara, J. The defendant is charged with two counts of attempted criminal diversion of prescription medications in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 178.15 [1]) and unlawful possession of marijuana (Penal Law § 221.05). By notice of motion, served and filed on January 14, 2009, he has moved to dismiss the accu

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J.), rendered May 12, 2005, as amended May 25, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and conspiracy in the second and fourth degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 19 years, 8Vs to 25 years and lVs to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed. With appropriate limiting instructions, the court

Carpinello, J. Appeal, by permission, from an order of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), entered April 19, 2006, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment convicting him of the crimes of attempted murder in the second degree, kidnapping in the second degree, robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal use of a firear

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered April 10, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction is not preserved for appellate review (see Pe