Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Poku v. The City of New York”
Berrios v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
*528 MEMORANDUM JONES, II, District Judge. In his Amended Complaint, (Dkt. No. 4, Amended Complaint [hereinafter AC]), Luis A. Berrios, III (“Plaintiff’) sued the City of Philadelphia (“the City”), Police Officer Michael Gentile (“Gentile”), Police Officer Robert Tavarez (“Tavarez”) (collectively “the officers”), Detective Joseph Newbert (“
LNV Corp. v. Forbespublic domain
*806 In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Willie Forbes appeals, as limited by his brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated July 11, 2013, as denied his cross motion to vacate his default in appearing and answering the complaint and to dismiss the complaint insofar as as
Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. In this action, plaintiff Johnson Poku Okyere brings claims against defendants Todd Houslanger, Houslanger and Associates, PLLC (collectively, the “Houslanger *525Defendants”), and Palisades Collection, LLC (“Palisades”) for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Pr
Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. In this action, plaintiff Johnson Poku Okyere brings claims against defendants Todd Houslanger, Houslanger and Associates, PLLC (collectively, the “Houslanger Defendants”), and Palisades Collection, LLC (“Palisades”) for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (the “FDCPA”),
Chaghervand v. Carefirstpublic domain
909 F.Supp. 304 (1995) Constance CHAGHERVAND, Plaintiff, v. CAREFIRST, et al., Defendants. HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF the MID-ATLANTIC, INC. t/a CareFirst, Plaintiff, v. Harry CHASE, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. MJG-93-1097, MJG-93-3943. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Northern Division. August 21, 1995. *305</
In Re Joseph Bordenpublic domain
BRYSON, Circuit Judge. Joseph Borden appeals from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, which sustained the examiner’s rejection of Borden’s application for a design patent as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We affirm. I Borden filed a patent application on August 15, 1989, cl