Cases

754 N.E.2d 1007 (2001) Martha POIRIER, Administratrix of the Estate of David Poirier, deceased, and widow in her own right, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., ACandS, Inc., Chicago Firebrick, Inc., Corhart Refractories, Flintkote Co., Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical, North American Refractories, Plibrico Sales & Svcs., Appellees-Defendants. No. 45A03-9910-CV-388. Court of Appeals of

Opinion BISHOP, J. The plaintiff homeowners appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of Wilton (board) dismissing their appeal from the board’s decision upholding the denial of a permit for construction on the plaintiffs’ property. The main issue on appeal is how General Statutes § 8-26a (b) applies to the plaintiffs’ lot and t

RADER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Valerie E. Johnson, filed the present petition for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board), dated August 21, 2003. The Board’s decision held that it lacked jurisdiction over petitioner’s individual right of action (IRA) appeal. Because the Board did not err in reaching its decision, this court affirms. BACKGROUND

34 Kan.App. 2d 720 (2005) CHAD D. RIDNOUR, Claimant/Appellee, v. KENNETH R. JOHNSON, INC., Respondent/Appellant, and GENERAL CASUALTY, Insurance Carrier/Appellant. No. 94,149. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed December 16, 2005. *721 Timothy G. Lutz and James L. MowBray, of Wallace, Saunders, Austin, Bro

MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON delivered the opinion of the court. This appeal is from the order of the district court for Wheat-land county appointing the respondent administrator of the estate of George Mapes, deceased. From the record these facts appear: That the deceased died on October 17, 1940, and that immediately upon his death respondent notified decedent’s sister, Verna Anderson, of Glenwood,

445 F.Supp. 838 (1978) George H. POIRIER, III, Plaintiff, v. Joseph E. HODGES, Ralph D. Gray, and Doe 1, Defendants. No. 76-12-Civ-Oc. United States District Court, M. D. Florida, Ocala Division. February 2, 1978. *839 *840 John L. Riley, St. Petersburg, Fla., Jack F. White, Jr., Clearwater, F

Gardner, J. In December, 2005, plaintiff Sylanda Y. Johnson (“Johnson”) was traveling as a passenger in a vehicle owned by Enterprise Rent-A-Car of Boston, Inc. (“Enterprise”) and operated by Keith O. Baxter (“Baxter”) when it collided with a second vehicle owned by Tammy Lapan and operated by Marc Lapan (“Lapans”). Johnson suffered injuries, and incurred $14,791.24 in medical expenses. At the time of the accid

PER CURIAM: Appellant cites as prejudicial error the actions of the trial counsel in altering a Booker rights acknowledgement form offered as a prosecution exhibit in presentencing which appellant alleges was an otherwise inadmissible document. The alteration, the making of which trial counsel has admitted, consisted of his adding the date of appellant’s acknowledging signature which had been omitted from the space

OPINION COOK, Judge: In United States v. Banks, 7 M.J. 92 (C.M.A.1979), the Court terminated the rule promulgated in Dunlap v. Convening Authority, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 135, 48 C.M.R. 751 (1974), regarding speedy review at the command level of the record of conviction of an accused ordered into post-conviction confinement or placed under other significant restraint. A perceived ambiguity in the

CEDARBURG, Chief Judge: Appellant was originally tried on 27 November 1978; he was charged with but one specification alleging an unauthorized absence, from 7 June 1977 to 29 July 1978, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 886. Appellant pleaded guilty to an unauthorized absence from 7 June 1977 to 2 January 1978 but not guilty to the balance of the specification. The military judg

214 B.R. 528 (1997) In re John J. POIRIER, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 97-22580. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut. November 6, 1997. James F. Longwell, and Audrey B. Blondin, Law Offices of Audrey B. Blondin, Torrington, CT, for Debtor. Molly T. Whiton, The Witherspoon Law Offices, Farmington, CT, for LaSalle National Bank, Trustee. RULING ON DEBTO

113 A.2d 642 (1955) George H. POIRIER, Sr., et al. v. James W. QUINN Tax Collector of the City of Woonsocket. Eq. No. 2325. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. April 28, 1955. *643 William G. Grande, Providence, Samuel H. Brenner, Woonsocket, for complainants. Israel Rabinovitz, City Solicitor, Woonsocket, for respondent. <

Wilkins, J. The defendants, Robert Summers and Robert Nee, Boston police officers, appeal following a Superior Court jury verdict awarding damages to the plaintiff Johnson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), for the violation of Johnson’s civil rights. In answer to special questions (Mass. R. Civ. P. 49, 365 Mass. 812 [1974]), the jury found that the defendants did not use excessive force

*1006FINAL JUDGMENT FOR ALL DEFENDANTS ON ALL COUNTS SIDNEY M. WEAVER, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER was tried before the Court on April 12 and 19, 1993, and the Court, having observed the candor and demeanor of the witnesses, examined the exhibits placed into evidence, having heard the arguments of counsel and being otherwise fully advised in the prem

Tapley, J. On exceptions. These cases by 'stipulation are to be considered together as the facts and circumstances pertaining to Lipman Poultry Company are applicable to the other appellants. An appeal was taken to the Superior Court under provisions of Sec. 33, Chap. 17, R. S. 1954 from a decision of the State Tax Assessor on the sales and use taxability of certain products purchased by the appellant for use in its poultry busin

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Tommie Lee Dunmore and Ronald Eugene Johnson appeal from their convictions, by a jury, of the crime of robbery of the Central State Bank of Kansas City, Missouri, on May 28, 1970. Following trial, defendant Johnson was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment, and defendant Dunmore to ten years’ imprisonment,

Hoi/r, J. This action was brought to recover $4,000, the amount of two drafts or cashier’s checks drawn by defendant on the Merchants Bank of Winona in favor of plaintiff, and upon which defendant had afterwards stopped payment. Defendant answered, alleging that plaintiff had entered into an agreement to sell Jerome Speltz certain shares of stock in a land company at $61 per share and $224 besides; that Spel

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D22-1369 LT Case Nos. 2019-CP-058938 2011-CP-053637 2012-CP-024994 _____________________________ GEORGE DORA, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF MARY ROSE MORRISON, the surviving spouse of PAUL DOUGLAS MORRISON, and as Co- Trustee of t

Earle, J. The Chancellor refused to allow the defendant the benefit of $2,891, which he claimed to have deducted from the plaintiff’s demand, as so much received by *Melisse Sompeyrac, the agent and attorney of Desire Sompeyrac, for whose benefit the suit is brought. It is alleged that the Chancellor is mistaken, in saying that the “ demands are entirely in distinct rights, and cannot be set off as claimed for the defence is not

84 F.Supp. 220 (1949) McCRAE v. JOHNSON. No. 4332. United States District Court D. Maryland. May 3, 1949. *221 Jack M. Fox, of Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff. Jules Shefferman, of Baltimore, Md., for defendant. CHESNUT, District Judge. The complaint in this case, by a tenant against his landlord, is based on t