Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Poe v. United Furniture Industries, Inc.”
McKinnon v. CV INDUSTRIES, INC.public domain
713 S.E.2d 495 (2011) Bobby E. McKINNON, Plaintiff, v. CV INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. No. COA10-1105. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 19, 2011. *497 C. Gary Triggs, P.A., Hildebran, by C. Gary Triggs, for Plaintiff-appellant. Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, Charlotte, by William L. Rikard, Jr., and James C.
In re: Ashley Furniture Indus.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA23-969 Filed 16 July 2024 Property Tax Commission, No. 19 PTC 0358 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF: ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC, Appellant, From the decision of the Davie County Board of Equalization and Review concerning the valuation of certain property for tax years 2018 and 2019. Appeal by Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc., from final decision enter
539 S.E.2d 348 (2000) HOLZ-HER U.S., INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant. No. COA99-1602. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 19, 2000. *349 Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, L.L.P., by Josephine H. Hicks and John E. Grupp, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant. Wilson & I
Rayonier Wood Products, LLC v. ScanWare, Inc.public domain
420 B.R. 915 (2009) RAYONIER WOOD PRODUCTS, L.L.C., Plaintiff/Appellee, v. SCANWARE, INC. and FinScan OY, Defendants/Appellant. No. 609CV028. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division. November 30, 2009. *917 James B. Durham, Durham, McHugh & Duncan, PC, Brunswick, GA, for Plaintiff/Appellee. J. F
TEST DRILLING SERVICE CO. v. Hanor Co., Inc.public domain
322 F.Supp.2d 965 (2004) TEST DRILLING SERVICE CO., Plaintiff, v. The HANOR COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 03-3063. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois. June 24, 2004. *966 William S. Thomas, Rabbitt Pitzer & Snodgrass, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff. *967 Edward W. Dwyer, T
751 F.Supp. 93 (1990) JIM CROCKETT PROMOTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ACTION MEDIA GROUP, INC., Rick Pack and Sillerman-McGee Communications Management Corp., Defendants. No. C-C-90-0220-P. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. November 19, 1990. *94 Dennis L. Guthrie, Robert K. Trobich, Murchison Gu
JUSTICE HASSELL, with whom JUSTICE LACY and JUSTICE KEENAN join, dissenting. I dissent because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that Housing Opportunities Made Equal, Inc., lacked standing to pursue its claims of racial discrimination against Nationwide. The General Assembly amended the Virginia Fair Housing Law in 1991 to permit housing organizations such as HOME to pursue housing discrimination claims i
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
431 B.R. 263 (2010) In re TRAFFORD DISTRIBUTING CENTER, INC. a/k/a Trafford Distribution Center, Inc., Debtor. Soneet R. Kapila, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Richard I. Clark, as trustee for the Matthew Wortley Trust d/b/a X Co. Finance, Richard I. Clark, as trustee for the Matthew Wortley Trust d/b/a X Co. Factoring Corp., Richard I. Clark, d/b/a X Co. Factoring Corp., Richard I. Clark, as trustee for the Matthew Wortley Trus
Sea-Roy Corp. v. Parts R Parts, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION OSTEEN, District Judge. Defendant-Counterclaimant Rammax Maschinenbau GmbH [“Rammax”] owns the registered trademark “RAMMAX” [“the RAMMAX mark”]. Rammax, and its American distributor, Defendant-Counterclaimant Multiquip, Inc. [“Multiquip”], have moved for a preliminary injunction against Plaintiff-Counterdefendants Sea-Roy Corporation [“Sea-Roy”] and AMERAMAX Contractors Eq
Elbar, Inc. v. Claussenpublic domain
OVARD, Justice. Elbar, Inc. and Jasper Bullock appeal from a final judgment awarding actual and punitive damages to appellees William D. and Wanda Claussen for the death of their son, William Dean Claussen. Appellants will be referred to collectively as “Elbar.” The Claussen’s son, William Dean, was killed in a highway accident involving a tractor-trailer truck driven by Bullock. Bullock, an employee of Elba
United States v. Stevenspublic domain
29 F.Supp.2d 592 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Donald G. STEVENS, Defendant. No. A97-0121 CR (JKS). United States District Court, D. Alaska. December 8, 1998. *593 Steven E. Skrocki, Assistant United States Attorney, and Robert C. Bundy, United States Attorney, Anchorage, Alaska, for the United States of America.
Garza v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION YOCK, Judge. In this breach of contract action, the plaintiffs allege that the United States Customs Service (“the Customs Service” or “Customs”) engaged them to assist in apprehending alleged drug smugglers through a maritime sting operation. The Court heard testimony and argument during a week of trial and carefully read the parties’ post-trial submissions. Although the Court believes that the plai
CHASANOW, Judge, dissenting: The majority opinion may be a good example of why appellate courts should not decide cases on issues neither briefed nor argued by parties. The Court decides that, absent express statutory authority, any contractual late fee for failure to make a timely payment of money is limited to the 6 % per annum rate of interest provided for in th
Woonsocket Prescription Center, Inc. v. Michaelsonpublic domain
417 F.Supp. 1250 (1976) WOONSOCKET PRESCRIPTION CENTER, INC., et al., v. Julius MICHAELSON et al. Civ. A. No. 760275. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. July 27, 1976. *1251 *1252 Michael A. Silverstein, Max Wistow, Merrill W. Sherman, Providence, R. I., for plaintiffs. Alle
Mill's Pride, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation, and Mill's Pride Limited Partnership v. Continental Insurance Companypublic domain
OPINION STAFFORD, District Judge. Appellant appeals the district court’s ruling that Michigan law governs this diversity contract action. We reverse. I. BACKGROUND Mill’s Pride, Inc., and Mill’s Pride Limited Partnership are involved in the purchase, manufacture, and wholesale selling of furniture through
Wayne-Gossard Corp. v. Moretz Hosiery Mills, Inc.public domain
384 F.Supp. 63 (1974) WAYNE-GOSSARD CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MORETZ HOSIERY MILLS, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. ST-C-73-24. United States District Court, W. D. North Carolina, Statesville Division. October 1, 1974. *64 Charles B. Park, III, W. Thad Adams, III, Parrott, Bell, Seltzer, Park & Gibson, Joseph W. Grier, Jr., Gri
816 F.Supp. 389 (1991) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ANY AND ALL ASSETS OF THAT CERTAIN BUSINESS KNOWN AS SHANE COMPANY, etc., et al., Defendants. No. 6:91CV00338. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Winston-Salem Division. September 6, 1991. *390 *391 U.S. Atty., M.D.
United States v. Container Corporation of Americapublic domain
273 F.Supp. 18 (1967) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al., Defendants. No. C-180-G-63. United States District Court M. D. North Carolina, Greensboro Division. August 31, 1967. *19 William H. Murdock, U. S. Atty., Greensboro, N. C., Lewis Bernstein, Wharey M. Freeze, Gregory B. Hovendon
Tlingit & Haida Indians v. United Statespublic domain
Nichols, Judge, dissenting: I regret that I feel compelled to dissent in this case, though perhaps not as keenly as if my views commanded majority support, leading to a new trial and further delay in righting the ancient wrongs done the ancestors of these Indians. My minority position, happily, exempts me from feeling any moral scruples against saying what I think. Then too, I am not certain the errors