Cases

TERRI F. LOVE, Judge. h State Farm appeals the trial court’s finding that the decedent’s primary residence was with its insured at the time of death. According to the testimony, the decedent resided with the insured, which would provide insurance coverage for the decedent pursuant to the insured’s uninsured motorist coverage with State Farm. However, State Farm produced documentary evidence that the decedent utilized address

[Cite as State v. Pleasant, 2025-Ohio-115.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAWRENCE COUNTY State of Ohio, : Case Nos. 23CA29 23CA30 Plaintiff-Appellee, : DECISION AND v.

[Cite as Mt. Pleasant Blacktopping Co., Inc. v. Inverness Group, Inc., 2025-Ohio-284.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO MT. PLEASANT BLACKTOPPING CO., : APPEAL NO. C-240134 INC., TRIAL NO. A-2102231 : Plaintiff-Appellee,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0209p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MARC VALENTINO BARRERA, │ Plaintiff-Appel

Opinion issued May 19, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00586-CR ——————————— ELIJAH ISAIAH-DOMINIQUE PLEASANT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Justice PLEICONES, Dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse the court of appeals as in my view, the erroneous admission of the DNA evidence — which the majority finds “compelling”— was not harmless. I would remand for a new trial. The majority holds that notwithstanding the DNA evidence, there was abundant, independent evidence in the record from which the ju

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Because I continue to believe that M & M Medical Supplies has failed to carry its burden in opposition to the hospital’s motion for summary judgment, I respectfully dissent. The first element of a claim of monopolization under § 2 of the Sherman Act is “market power.” In order to prove the exercise of market power, a plaintiff must show (1) the existe

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. This case arose from the accidental shooting death of Jeffrey Pleasant by Michael Zamieski, a Detroit police officer. This appeal follows a directed verdict for the City of Detroit and a jury verdict in favor of Zamieski. For the reasons stated below, we affirm. The shooting occurred on the night of August 11, 1985, shortly after Pleasant unsuccessfully attempted to st

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM J. NEALON, District Judge. BACKGROUND The above-captioned action is one seeking review of a decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff Roderick Clinton Jenkins’s claim for social security supplemental security income benefits. For the reasons set forth below the decision of the Commissioner will be affi

FEW, C.J. Daniel Jenkins appeals his conviction for criminal sexual conduct in the first degree. Jenkins argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress DNA test results because the affidavit offered in support of the search warrant for samples of his DNA did not meet the constitutional and statutory requirements for issuance of the warrant. We agree. We remand the case to the trial court for a factual determina

[Cite as Roberts v. Pleasant Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 2011-Ohio-4560.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY DANIEL E. ROBERTS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 9-11-04 v. PLEASANT LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

738 F.Supp. 1017 (1990) M & M MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. PLEASANT VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. A:88-1099. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Parkersburg Division. June 6, 1990. *1018 James A. Burt and James A. Gustino, Burt & Gustino, Orlando, Fla., and Richa

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-0589 Filed December 9, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. THOMAS EDWARD JENKINS SR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Stuart P. Werling (plea) and Marlita A. Greve (sentencing), Judges. Thomas Jenkins Sr. appeals from his sentence

NEALON, J., ORDER In their latest motion to compel discovery, plaintiffs, Thomas Brogan and Wendy Brogan (“the Brogans”), seek access to the “original” records and “digital files” of defendant, Conestoga Title Insurance Company (“Conestoga”). Oral argument on the Brogans’ discovery motion was conducted on July 3, 2013, at the conclusion of which this matter was submitted for a decision.

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal by Wanda Sue Jenkins from an order of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, West Virginia, ordering that legal custody of her two infant children be transferred to the children’s father, Steven Wayne Jenkins. On appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court erred and abused its discretion in ordering the transfer. After reviewing the questions presented and the documents filed, this Court ag

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-25-00136-CV IN RE THE VILLAS OF MOUNT PLEASANT, LLC, ET AL. Original Mandamus Proceeding Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators, The Villas of Mount Pleasant, LLC d/b/a Greenhill Villas f/d/b/a Villas of Moun

GREENE, Judge. Richard L. Hix and Jane Hix (plaintiffs) appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of William Harold Jenkins (defendant) in plaintiffs’ negligence suit against defendant. The evidence shows that Richard Hix (Hix) was riding with defendant on 4 November 1990, when the defendant’s car was involved in an accident. Both men were volunteer firemen for the Iredell Count

489 So.2d 1005 (1986) STATE of Louisiana v. Clarence PLEASANT. No. KA 85-1354. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 28, 1986. *1007 Donald T. Carmouche, Dist. Atty., Donaldsonville, Ralph Tureau, Asst. Dist. Atty., Gonzales, for State of Louisiana Plaintiff Appellee. Alan J. Robert, Gonzales, for Clarence Pleas

This is a suit over the ownership of a promissory note and a deed of trust lien given to secure the note. The case was tried to a jury and judgment was entered in accordance with the answers of the jury to special issues. The history of the case will be given as revealed by the record, including both the pleadings and the evidence at the time of trial. On August 29, 1952, and prior thereto, L. B. Jenkins had been lending the money of his sister, Mrs. Donnibel Dodd, a widow, to

13 F.Supp.2d 905 (1998) Jerold W. BLANSCET, James L. Jones and Walter F. Nolen, Plaintiffs, v. JENKINS ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant. No. 97-2255. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division. July 10, 1998. *906 Daniel Shue, Sexton & Fields, P.L.C., Fort Smith, AR, for Plaintiffs. G. Alan Wooten, Wa