⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Platt v. Commissioner of Social Security”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999-09-01 · Published · cited 145× · 188 F.3d 1047; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20915; 1999 WL 675416
WOLLMAN, Chief Judge. Michael D. Warburton appeals from the district court’s 3 judgment affirming the denial of his claim for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, and supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383Í.
District Court, N.D. New York · 2009-08-24 · Published · cited 1× · 660 F. Supp. 2d 401; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74716; 2009 WL 2584827
660 F.Supp.2d 401 (2009) Frank DiBLASI, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. No. 1:06-CV-1378. United States District Court, N.D. New York. August 24, 2009. *403 Peter M. Margolius, Esq., Catskill, NY, for Plaintiff. Office of Regional General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Region II, Susan J
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 562 U.S. 1171
*1171ante, p. 835; ante, p. 845; ante, p. 848; ante, p. 849; ante, p. 850; ante, p. 850; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 852; ante, p. 853;
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2025-01-14 · Published · cited 4× · 230 Conn. App. 145
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005-02-17 · Published · cited 17× · 399 F.3d 128; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2776; 2005 WL 375936
MESKILL, Circuit Judge. This appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Platt, /., ostensibly concerns whether the law firm of Binder & Binder P.C. is entitled to $1,200 in attorney’s fees that it earned representing a Social Security claimant or whether Binder’s recovery is barred by the claimant’s subsequent bankr
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007-03-27 · Published · cited 88× · 481 F.3d 141; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7133
MINER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Binder & Binder, PC (“Binder”) appeals from a judgment entered on August 22, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Platt, J.) dismissing for lack of jurisdiction its action against defendant-appellee Jo Anne Barnhart, as the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “SSA”). Binde
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017-05-23 · Published · cited 31× · 159 A.3d 1112; 325 Conn. 640; 2017 Conn. LEXIS 135
McDONALD, J. The petitioner, Robert Breton, was found guilty of two counts of murder and one count of capital felony for the 1987 stabbing deaths of his former wife and his son, and was sentenced to death. 1 The petitioner thereafter filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, attacking both his conviction a
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017-05-09 · Published · cited 14× · 163 A.3d 1223; 172 Conn. App. 843
FLYNN, J. The petitioner, Antwon W., appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. He claims that, contrary to the decision of the habeas court, his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to (1) adequately protect his constitutional right to an impartial jury; (2
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013-09-24 · Published · cited 2× · 145 Conn. App. 834; 77 A.3d 832; 2013 WL 5274295; 2013 Conn. App. LEXIS 461
Opinion HARPER, J. The petitioner, Robert A. White, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court erred by holding that he failed to prove ineffective assistance of trial counsel with respect to counsel’s alleged failure to: (1) advise the petitioner adequately regarding a nolo contendere plea
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006-12-19 · Published · cited 1× · 98 Conn. App. 717; 912 A.2d 497; 2006 Conn. App. LEXIS 530
Opinion ROGERS, J. The petitioner, Oscar Harvey, appeals following the denial of certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court (1) abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal and (2) improperly dismissed the habeas petition. Specifically, the petitioner allege
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 574 So. 2d 176; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 437; 1991 WL 5007
PER CURIAM. The claimant in this workers’ compensation case appeals the judge’s ruling that a stipulation entered into between the claimant and the e/c terminated the claimant’s right to receive supplemental compensation benefits under Section 440.15(1)(e)1., Florida Statutes (1981).1 We reverse and remand. This case comes to us in a rather unique procedural posture. We are revi
Texas Supreme Court · 2024-02-16 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-0169 ══════════ Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education for the State of Texas; Bellpas, Inc.; and Copperas Cove Independent School District, Petitioners, v. Lampasas Independent School District, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997-01-09 · Published · cited 9× · 557 N.W.2d 335; 1997 Minn. LEXIS 5; 1997 WL 6205
557 N.W.2d 335 (1997) Melvin A. KRECH, Relator, v. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, Respondent. No. C2-96-80. Supreme Court of Minnesota. January 9, 1997. *336 Steven E. Antolak, Laurence A. Anderson, London Anderson Antolak & Hoeft, Ltd., Minneapolis, for relator. Hubert H. Humphrey III, Atty. Gen., James W. Neher, Asst. Atty
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002-07-30 · Published · cited 8× · 261 Conn. 181; 801 A.2d 783; 2002 Conn. LEXIS 288
Opinion VERTEFEUILLE, J. The sole issue in this appeal is whether workers’ compensation benefits for temporary total disability1 may be discontinued when the recipient *183is incarcerated.* 2 We conclude that the plaintiffs imprisonment does not permit the defendant second injury fund
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998-07-31 · Published · cited 23× · 152 F.3d 83; 82 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5467; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 18161
152 F.3d 83 82 A.F.T.R.2d 98-5467, 98-2 USTC P 50,606 NESTLE HOLDINGS, INC., On Behalf of Itself and ConsolidatedSubsidiaries, And As Successor In Interest ToNestle Enterprises, Inc. AndConsolidated Subsidiaries,Petitioner-Appellant,Cross-Appellee,v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee,Cross-Appellant. Docket Nos. 96-4158, 96-4192.
California Court of Appeal · 1965-05-21 · Published · cited 8× · 234 Cal. App. 2d 577; 44 Cal. Rptr. 476; 1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 1044
234 Cal.App.2d 577 (1965) COURTNEY C. PLATT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GLENN BILLINGSLEY et al., Defendants and Appellants. Civ. No. 471. California Court of Appeals. Fifth Dist. May 21, 1965. W. Earl Shafer for Defendants and Appellants. Wittman & Schmidt and William A. Wittman, Jr., for Plaintiff and Respondent. STONE, J. This is
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998-07-31 · Published · cited 1× · 152 F.3d 83
WINTER, Chief Judge: Nestlé Holdings, Inc. (“Nestlé”) appeals from the Tax Court’s determination of tax deficiencies. See Nestlé Holdings, Inc. v. Commissioner, 70 T.C.M. (CCH) 682, 1995 WL 544886, 1995 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 439 (1995). Nestlé is a first-tier subsidiary of Nestlé S.A. (“NSA”). The Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined tax deficiencies concerning Nestlé’s sale to NSA of various intangible assets,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-04-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0946 (CKK) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 25-0952 (CKK) DO
Supreme Court of Vermont · 1975-10-07 · Published · cited 12× · 346 A.2d 221; 133 Vt. 533; 1975 Vt. LEXIS 447
Wesley J. Ellis, who for some eleven and one-half years was employed as a radial drill operator in the machine tool industry, retired on August 30, 1974, in accordance with his company's mandatory retirement policy. He receives both a retirement pension and social security benefits. He suffers from a chronic pulmonary obstructive disease commonly called emphysema. On September 4, 1974, he applied for unemployment compensation benefits and was found to be ineligible by a claims
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986-06-06 · Published · cited 25× · 792 F.2d 683; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25992; 58 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5122
POSNER, Circuit Judge. Illinois Power Company asks us to reverse a decision of the Tax Court assessing a deficiency in the company's 1975 federal income taxes of $7 million and a deficiency in its 1976 federal income taxes of $0.6 million. 83 T.C. 842 (1984). The assessment for 1975 relates to investment tax credit, the assessment f