Cases

ORDER STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge. Kristy Schwade sues her former employer, Total Plastics, Inc., for healthcare benefits under an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) plan. Arguing that Schwade failed to exhaust administrative remedies, that the suit is time-barred, and that Schwade violated the plan by refusing to sign a subrogation agreement, Total Plastics moves (Doc.

OPINION AND ORDER ROGER B. COSBEY, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff BRC Rubber & Plastics, Inc. (“BRC”), and Defendant Continental Carbon Company (“Continental”) entered into a Supply Agreement as of January 1, 2010, in which Continental agreed to supply all of BRC’s requirements for carbon black.1 On June 2, 2011, BRC terminated that Agreement an

ORDER ON MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge. In anticipation of trial, Berry Plastics Corporation and Covalence Specialty Coatings, LLC move to exclude the expert testimony of Packgen’s damages expert on multiple grounds, including lack of qualifications, improper methodology, and lack of facts or data supporting his opinions. The Court denies the motion because Packgen

SWAN, Associate Justice, concurring. Novelle Watts, Jr. (“Appellant”) appeals the Superior Court’s October 17, 2007 Order dismissing this case for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 7 of the Rules of the Superior Court. On appeal, Appellant importunes this Court to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion when it dismi

Liam O'Grady, United States District Judge This lawsuit arises from an ownership dispute regarding Bob Ross's intellectual property and right of publicity. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The motions were fully briefed, and the Court heard oral argument on September 7, 2018. Upon consideration of the pleadings, the oral arguments, and the evidence in the record, the Court concluded that summary judgment for Defendan

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Hospira, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its primary place of business in Illinois, manufactures pharmaceuticals and medical supplies. One of Hospira's products is a chemical compound known as dexmedetomidine, which Hospira sells to health care providers under the brand name Precedex. Between 2012 and 2014, Hospira obtained four patents covering a new product made from dexmedetomidine

320 F.Supp.2d 95 (2004) FORTIS CORPORATE INSURANCE, S.A., Plaintiff, v. M/V CIELO DEL CANADA, and M/V California, in rem, and Italia Di Navigazione SpA, Buss Hansa Umschlagsgesellschaft mbH, and Juist Shipping GmbH in personam, Defendants. No. 02 CIV. 8987(GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 12, 2004. *96 D

NO. 12-16-00092-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS PERMIAN POWER TONG, INC., § APPEAL FROM THE 441ST APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT DIAMONDBACK E&P, LLC, APPELLEE § MIDLAND

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 21, 2016 Session CLASSIC CITY MECHANICAL, INC. v. POTTER SOUTH EAST, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 1855881 John F. Weaver, Chancellor ___________________________________ No. E2015-01890-COA-R3-CV-FILED-OCTOBER 14, 2016

AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed June 30, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00681-CV FRITZ MANAGEMENT, LLC, Appellant V. HUGE AMERICAN REAL ESTATE, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

OPINION OF THE COURT Stein, J. In this complex insurance dispute, we have accepted two certified questions from the Delaware Supreme Court asking us to determine (1) whether “all sums” or “pro rata” allocation applies where the excess insurance policies at issue either follow form to a non-cumulation provision or contain a non-cumulation and prior insurance

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 16, 2011 Session CUMBERLAND PROPERTIES, LLC v. RAVENWOOD CLUB, INC., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 09-18-I Claudia Bonnyman, Chancellor No. M2010-01814-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 5, 2011 This is a contract case. Appellant, a Nashville Country Club, hired Appellee, a real

Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction ... 508 II. Facts ... 508 A. Defendants' Product and Nature of Industry ... 508 B. Plaintiffs ... 509 C. Claims ... 509 D. Jury Verdict and Rule 50 Motions ... 509 1. Jury Verdict ... 509

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ALBERTSON’S LLC, NEW ) ALBERTSONS L.P., SAFEWAY INC., ) and UNITED SUPERMARKETS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. No. N25C-12-001 KMM ) CCLD v. ) ) EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., )

Amended Opinion Granting In Part Plaintiffs’ Motion For Summary Judgment And Denying Defendant’s Cross-Motion For Partial Summary Judgment1 PHILLIP J. SHEFFERLY, Bankruptcy Judge. Introduction This adversary proceeding arises out of an agreement for the purchase and sale of a business in the automotive industry. Although originally structur

Opinion of the Court by Justice ABRAMSON. Piercing the corporate veil is an equitable doctrine invoked by courts to allow a creditor recourse against the shareholders of a corporation. In short, the limited liability which is the hallmark of a corporation is disregarded and the debt of the pierced entity becomes enforceable against those who have exercised dominion over the corporatio

ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIM TERMS OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 7,333,395 Ron Clark, United States District Judge Plaintiff Biosonix, LLC filed suit against Defendants Hydrowave, LLC, T-H Marine Supplies, Inc., and RHP Industries, LLC (“Defendants”) claiming infringement of United States Patent No. 7,338,395 (“the ’395 patent”). The court conducted a Markman hearing to assist in interpreting the meaning of

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-23-00100-CV GULF VIEW PRIVATE INVESTMENT, INC. f/k/a Whitesell International, Inc., Neil Whitesell, Vincent Costantino, Adam Arters, Innova Aerospace Service & Support, LLC and Sierra Industries, LLC,

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge. Oxmoor Portfolio, LLC filed this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order granting a motion to set aside a default judgment in a garnishment proceeding, which motion was brought by Flooring & Tile Superstore of Conyers, Inc. (“FTSC”) pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (3). The issues in this appeal are (1) whether FTSC was required to satisfy the requirements of OCGA § 18-4-91 in orde

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor