Cases

MOORE, J. 12WiIlie Mae Taylor appeals a summary judgment that dismissed her workers’ compensation claim. She also appeals an earlier judgment that sustained the compensation carrier’s dilatory exception of vagueness. For the reasons expressed, we affirm the judgment insofar as it dismissed the claim for weekly indemnity benefits. However, finding genuine issues of material fact as to Ms. Taylor’s choice of an orthopedic specia

402 B.R. 217 (2009) In re PLASTECH ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC., et al.[1], Debtors. No. 08-42417. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 17, 2009. As Amended March 20, 2009. *218 OPINION DENYING IN PART INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTS WAREHOUSE LLC'S THIRD AMENDED APPLICATION

382 B.R. 90 (2008) In re PLASTECH ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,[1] Debtors. Chrysler LLC, Plaintiff, v. Plastech Engineered Products, Inc., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-42417. Adversary No. 08-4120. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 19, 2008. *91

399 B.R. 1 (2008) In re PLASTECH ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,[1] Debtors. No. 08-42417. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 4, 2008. *3 Angela Pappas, Gregg Galardi, Mark L. Desgrosseilliers, Sarah E. Pierce, Kristhy Peguero, Wilmington, DE, Deborah L. Fish, Jayson M. Macyda, Joel D

397 B.R. 828 (2008) In re PLASTECH ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,[1] Debtors. No. 08-42417. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 10, 2008. *830 OPINION OVERRULING DEBTOR'S OBJECTIONS TO CERTAIN SECTION 503(b)(9) CLAIMS BASED UPON DEBTOR'S ASSERTION THAT SUCH CLAIMS ARE FOR

394 B.R. 147 (2008) In re PLASTECH ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,[1] Debtors. No. 08-42417. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 16, 2008. *148 Angela Pappas, Gregg Galardi, Mark L. Desgrosseilliers, Matthew Ward, Sarah E. Pierce, Wilmington, DE, Deborah L. Fish, Detroit, MI, for Debt

Order Jones Day has asked for clarification, but the motion is in substance one for rehearing. The district court ordered Jones Day to pay sanctions to plaintiffs, and we affirmed. Jones Day believes that the sanctions should be paid to the clerk of court. Doing that would require a modification of the judgment as well as of our opinion. Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(c)(4) says that a court may order sanctions to be paid to a

525 F.3d 605 (2008) UNITED STARS INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PLASTECH ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Jones Day, Appellant. Nos. 07-2919, 07-3052, 07-3106, 07-3107. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 2, 2008. Decided May 13, 2008. *606 Nancy B. Johnson,

418 B.R. 235 (2009) In re PLASTECH ENGINEERED *236 PRODUCTS, INC., et al.[1], Debtors. H.S. Die & Engineering, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Ford Motor Company, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-42417. Adversary No. 09-4815. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 27, 2009.

OPINION1 MARY F. WALRATH, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the Motion of Meridian Automotive Systems, Inc. (“Meridian”) to Compel Compliance with the Terms of the Critical Vendor Orders by which Meridian seeks an order compelling Plastech Engineered Products, Inc. (“Plastech”) to *714disgorge $1.25 million which it

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 07-2919, 07-3052, 07-3106 & 07-3107 UNITED STARS INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PLASTECH ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. JONES DAY, Appellant.

65 F.Supp.2d 610 (1999) HOWTING-ROBINSON ASSOCIATES, INC., a Michigan Corporation, Plaintiff, v. BRYAN CUSTOM PLASTICS, a division of United Screw and Bolt Corporation, an Ohio corporation, and Plastech Engineered Products, Inc., a Michigan corporation, jointly and severally, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 97-74470. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. Septem

R. STEVEN WHALEN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Sanctioning Defendant for Making Material Misrepresentations of Fact to the Court [Doc. # 37], which has been referred for hearing and determination under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). I held a status conference regardin

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION REGARDING CASH COLLATERAL MOTION Scott W. Dales, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION Cherry Growers, Inc., as chapter 11 debtor in possession (the “DIP”), seeks an order granting Debtor’s Motion for Order Authorizing Debtor’s Use of Cash Collateral and for Adequate Protection with Huntington National Bank (

455 B.R. 353 (2011) In re MOMENTA, INC., Debtor. No. 10-14548-JMD. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire. August 19, 2011. *355 Charles R. Bennett, Jr., Esq., Christopher M. Condon, Esq., John C. Elstad, Esq., Murphy & King P.C., Boston, MA, for Debtor. David E. LeFevre, Esq., Hage & Hodes, P.A., Manchester, NH,

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CADILLAC RUBBER & PLASTICS, INC., doing FOR PUBLICATION business as AVON AUTOMOTIVE, and AVON February 11, 2020 AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellan

Thomas J. Tucker, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction Among other things, this Chapter 11 case raises the question whether the Debtor's entanglement with a medical marijuana dispensary business, which business is illegal under federal criminal law but not necessarily illegal under Michigan law, requires the dismissal of this federal bankruptcy case. The Court concludes that dismissal is

OPINION REGARDING MOTION OF AMERI-SOURCE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS FOR ALLOWANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM AND TO COMPEL PAYMENT THOMAS J. TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge. 1. Introduction The dispute now before the Court requires the Court to decide, among other things, whether an administrative expense request under 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(9) may ever be disallowed based on 11 U.S.C. § 502(d). The answer is n

MOORE, J. | Offshore Energy Services Inc. appeals a judgment which found that its former employee, Leroy Brown, sustained a work-related injury, that his current medical condition was causally related to the work-related injury, and that he was entitled to supplemental earnings benefits (“SEB”) starting June 28, 2009. Brown answers the appeal, contesting portions of the judgment which denied his claims for SEB from November

401 B.R. 131 (2009) In re GOODY'S FAMILY CLOTHING, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-11133 (CSS). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. February 6, 2009. *132 Gregg M. Galardi, Marion M. Quirk (Argued), Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Debtors and Debtors in Possession. Michael E. Goddard (Argu