Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Azar II”
Planned Parenthood of Wis., Inc. v. Azarpublic domain
(1) The number of patients, and, in particular, the number of low-income patients to be served; (2) The extent to which family planning services are needed locally; (3) The relative need of the applicant; (4) The capacity of the applicant to make rapid and effective use of the federal assistance; (5) The adequa
John C. Coughenour, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 13) and motion to seal (Dkt. No. 16). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing, the relevant record, and heard the parties' oral argument, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 13) and GRANTS the motion to seal (Dkt. No. 16) for the reasons explai
NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *314I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Planned Parenthood of New York City, Inc. ("PPNYC") challenges the issuance by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") of two Funding Opportunity Announcements (the "2018 FOAs") that describe the terms wh
Planned Parenthood v. Statepublic domain
10/09/2024 DA 23-0287 Case Number: DA 23-0287 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2024 MT 228 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONTANA; ALL FAMILIES HEALTHCARE; BLUE MOUNTAIN CLINIC; SAMUEL DICKMAN, M.D., and HELEN WEEMS, AP
Planned Parenthood v. Statepublic domain
10/09/2024 DA 23-0288 Case Number: DA 23-0288 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2024 MT 227 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MONTANA, and SAMUEL DICKMAN, M.D., on behalf of themselves and their patients,
Planned Parenthood of Greater v. Ushhspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER No. 18-35920 WASHINGTON AND NORTH IDAHO; PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE GREAT D.C. No. NORTHWEST AND THE HAWAIIAN 2:18-cv-00207- ISLANDS; PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TOR THE HEARTLAND, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HE
Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. v. Bentleypublic domain
OPINION Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is a challenge to a decision by the Governor of Alabama to terminate the State’s Medicaid provider agreement with Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. (‘PPSE’), which funds services unrelated to abortion, including routine gynecological exams, pregnancy counseling, and breast- and cervical-cancer screenings. The plaintiffs are PPSE and
California by and through Becerra v. Azarpublic domain
PER CURIAM: *1073BACKGROUND In 1970, Congress enacted Title X of the Public Health Service Act ("Title X") to create a limited grant program for certain types of pre-pregnancy family planning services. See Pub. L. No. 91-572,
State of California v. Alex Azar, IIpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 3 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through No. 19-15974 Attorney General Xavier Becerra,
State of California v. Alex Azar, IIpublic domain
FILED FOR PUBLICATION FEB 24 2020 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and No. 19-15974 through Attorney Gene
State of California v. Alex Azar, IIpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by No. 19-15974 and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:19-cv-01184-EMC v. ALEX M. AZAR II, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendants-Appellants. 2 STATE OF CA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-2453 v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs, th
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, IIpublic domain
ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1614 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services; DIANE FOLEY, M.D.,
THOMAS O. RICE, Chief United States District Judges BEFORE THE COURT are Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary or Permanent Injunction and Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16); Defendants' Cross-Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 19; 20); and Unopposed Motion for Leave to Appear and File Brief as Amici Curiae in
THOMAS O. RICE, Chief United States District Judge BEFORE THE COURT are Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief *1138(ECF No. 24) and Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Cross-Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27). This matter was heard with oral argument on April 24, 20
State v. Azarpublic domain
MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions are 20 states, the District of Columbia, the American Medical Association, the Oregon Medical Association, the Planned Parenthood Federation and their local affiliates, and individual medical providers. They seek to enjoin the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the Office of Population Affairs, and their respective leadership (collectively, the "Defendants"
Healthy Teen Network v. Azarpublic domain
Catherine C. Blake, United States District Judge The plaintiffs, Healthy Teen Network and the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore ("Baltimore City") have sued the defendants, Alex M. Azar II, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the Department of Health and Human Services itself, (collectively "HHS"), claiming that the defendants' decision to end their grant award under the Teen Pregnancy Prevention, ("
Wharf, Inc. v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE WHARF, INC. t/a THE WHARF, et al., Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Civil Action No. 15-1198 (CKK) Defendants, and WHARF HORIZONTAL REIT LEASEHOLDER LLC, et al., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM
Commonwealth of MA v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.public domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. 1 *212 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts brought suit on October 6, 2017, to enjoin the enforcement of two federal Interim Final Rules (together, the "IFRs") promulgated by the United States Departments
O'BANNON FOR O'BANNON v. Azarpublic domain
506 So.2d 522 (1987) Ethyl ("Obie") O'BANNON, as Legal Tutor for the Minor Benjamin Fleming-Azar O'BANNON v. Robert F. AZAR. No. 85 CA 1518. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. March 4, 1987. Rehearing Denied May 6, 1987. *523 Paula Perrone, Metairie, for plaintiff-appellant Ethyl ("Obie") O'Bannon as Le