Cases

2020 UT App 111 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LYNDA PIPKIN, JANICE LEGLER, BENJAMIN THOMPSON, ROBERT MCENTEE, ELIZABETH CARLIN, ARTURO MORALES LLAN, AND PAUL COZZENS, Appellants, v. DARYL ACUMEN, Appellee. Opinion No. 20190378-CA Filed July 30, 2020

2021 UT App 76 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS M.N.V. HOLDINGS LC, Appellant, v. 200 SOUTH LLC, Appellee. Amended Opinion 1 No. 20200626-CA Filed July 9, 2021 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Andrew H. Stone

2021 UT App 14 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS EQUINE HOLDINGS LLC, Appellant, v. AUBURN WOODS LLC, DENSONOCK LLC, DANIEL SIMMONS, AND BLUE SKY RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC., Appellees. Opinion No. 20181022-CA Filed February 11, 2021 Fourth District Court, Heber Department

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2025 UT 34 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH KYLE MATHEWS and RYAN SORENSEN, Appellants, v. CHARLES MCCOWN, CAMILLE HIGGINS, and JAY NIELSEN, Appellees. No. 2023

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1397 STEVES AND SONS, INC., Plaintiff − Appellee, and SAMUEL STEVES; EDWARD STEVES; JOHN G. PIERCE, Counter Defendants – Appellees, v. JELD-WEN, INC., Defendant – Appellant, and UNITED STATES OF AMERI

The jury found that, as a consequence of the merger and JELD-WEN's conduct in 2014 and thereafter, competition was substantially lessened in the doorskin market and that, as a result, Steves sustained injuries of the type that the antitrust laws were designed to prevent. Thereupon, the jury awarded Steves $58,632,454.00 in antitrust damages which, when trebled as required by statute, amounts to antitrust damages in the amount of $175,897,362.00. The jury al

ORDER HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge. This action arises from the merger of Cavalier Bag Company, Inc. into a subsidiary of The Barwick Corporation. The complaint alleges violations of the federal securities laws and the common law of Georgia. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to § 27 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa, and the principles of pendent and ancillary jurisdiction. Presently pending before

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises out of a private antitrust action brought by Southern Pacific Communications Company and Transportation Microwave Corporation (collectively “SPCC”) against the American Telephone and Telegraph Company and the local Bell operating telephone

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

This is a suit in equity to set aside, on the grounds of fraud, mental incapacity and undue influence, certain deeds conveying real estate. The evidence is too voluminous to attempt to set forth even by way of summaries the testimony of the fifty odd witnesses. However, the facts showing the general setting of the controversy, the parties thereto, their relations to each other and to the subject-matter of the action, are for the most part not in dispute. These will be given in general outline

ORDER RE ATTORNEY-CLIENT, WORK-PRODUCT AND SPECIAL OFFICER PRIVILEGES PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge. This securities fraud class action is being prosecuted by a certified class of buyers and sellers of various securities of LTV, Inc. against LTV, its steel subsidiary, Jones & Laughlin Steel Co. (“J&L”), LTV’s accountants, Ernst & Whinney (“E&W”) (formerly Ernst and Ernst) and vari

82 F.Supp. 753 (1949) UNITED STATES v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. et al. Civ. A. No. 1364. United States District Court D. New Jersey. January 19, 1949. As Corrected April 4, 1949. *754 *755 *756 *757