Cases

CHIN, Circuit Judge: During his freshman year of high school, plaintiff-appellee Anthony Zeno (“Anthony”) transferred to Stissing Mountain High School (“SMHS”) in Pine Plains, New York. SMHS was a part of defendant-appellant Pine Plains Central School District (the “District”). His fellow students harassed him for the next three-and-a-half

19-2738-cv Agosto v. New York City Department of Education, et al. In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2019 No. 19-2738-cv JASON AGOSTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MANUEL UREÑA,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION KIYO A. MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge: Presently before the court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy (“R&R”), filed on August 26, 2016. (ECF No. 29). The R&R recommends that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment be GRANTED and defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment be DENIED. (R&R at 29).

650 F.3d 65 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Janet Caldero, Celia I. Calderon, Martha Chellemi, Salih Chioke, Andrew Clement, Kristen D'Alessio, Laura Daniele, Charmaine Didonato, Dawn L. Ellis, Marcia P. Jarrett, Mary Kachadourian, Kathleen Luebkert, Adele A. McGreal, Margaret McMahon, Marianne Manousakis, Sandra D. Morton, Maureen Quinn, Harry Santana, Carl D. Smith, Kim Tatum, Frank Valdez, and Irene Wolkiewicz,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) JASON CHRISTOPHER LONG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-2406 (RC) ) DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, )

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff brings this action against the United States Departments of Justice (“DOJ”) and Homeland Security (“DHS”), and various components of these two agencies, under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), see 5 U.S.C. § 552. This matter is before the Court on defenda

HUDSON, Justice. *156 **708 Defendants, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (Wal-Mart) and National Union Fire Insurance Company, appealed the opinion and award of the North Carolina Industrial Commissio

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Candace Eidson, on behalf of herself and her minor child; Coneitra Miller, on behalf of herself and her minor child; Joy Brown, on behalf of herself and her minor children; Crystal Rouse, on behalf of herself and her minor children; Amanda McDougald Scott, on behalf of herself and her minor child; Penny Hanna, on behalf of herself and her minor children; the South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP; and The South Carolina

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 23 Elizabeth Perry I attest to the accuracy and ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS integrity of this document DIVISION IV No. CV-20-547 2023.08.15 11:24:34 -05'00' 2023.003.20269 LEODIS SLEDGE, INDIVIDUALLY AND Opinion Delivered January 19, 2022 AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF TANESHA LEACH,

755 F.Supp.2d 623 (2010) Diana MAY, Plaintiff, v. The BOROUGH OF PINE HILL, Fred Costantino, and John Kearney, Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-2628 (JEI/KMW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 17, 2010. *625 Richard F. Klineburger, III, Haddonfield, NJ, for Plaintiff. Brown & Connery, LLP, by Christ

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT McMAHON, District Judge. This is the latest chapter in the saga of The Education of Jaye Engwiller. In our last episode, Jaye’s parents had been vindicated in their desire to enroll their learning-disabled daughter at the private Kildonan School at the expense of the Pine Plains School District. This C

OPINION * Mark R. Hornak,- United States District Judge The three high' school student Plaintiffs are each transgender, and all are in their senior year at Pine-Richland (Pa.) High School (“High School”). ECF 43 at ¶ 15. Two of them, Juliet Evancho and Elissa Ridenour, each over eighteen years old, had “male” listed on their birth certificates when they were born.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims STATE OF OHIO, No. 20-288C (Filed: October 7, 2022) Plaintiff, Contract; Motion to Dismiss; v. Summary Judgment; Statute of Limitations; Declaratory THE UNIT

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-21-00373-CV __________________ ALVIN C. ALLEN JR., Appellant V. CROWN PINE TIMBER 1, L.P., Appellee __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from t

680 F.Supp.2d 996 (2010) HABITAT EDUCATION CENTER, David Zaber, Ricardo Jomarron, Don Waller, and Environmental Law and Policy Center, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Tom Tidwell, Chief, U.S. Forest Service, and Tom Vilsack, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Defendants. Case No. 03-C-1023. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. January 14, 2010.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2594 ___________________________ Pine Bluff School District Plaintiff - Appellant v. Ace American Insurance Company Defendant - Appell

680 F.Supp.2d 1007 (2010) HABITAT EDUCATION CENTER, David Zaber, Ricardo Jomarron, Don Waller, and Environmental Law and Policy Center, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Tom Tidwell, Chief, U.S. Forest Service, and Tom Vilsack, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Defendants. Case No. 04-C-0254. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. January 14, 2010.

OPINION DAMICH, Judge. This contract case is before the Court on the Defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on the issue of liability, dated July 12, 2000, and the Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment, dated September 11, 2000. At issue are 14 timber sale contracts that were suspended by the Forest Service. After consideration of the arguments presented by both par

MEMORANDUM JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge. This matter involves an apparently novel legal question arising at the intersection of a student’s right to a free appropriate public education under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) and a correctional institution’s legitimate interest in security and prison management. Specifically, we are tasked to interpret the strictures

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago’s motion for summary judgment [99]. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion [99] is granted. I. Background The Court takes the relevant facts from the parties’ Local Rule 56.1 statements: (1) Defendant’s