Cases

GASKINS, J. hThe plaintiffs, owners of Virginia Banks Plantation in Tensas Parish, appeal a trial court judgment finding that Zimmerman Farms, LLC is the owner of a disputed piece of property totaling 4.19 acres, which was formerly part of Virginia Banks Plantation. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment. FACTS The plaintiffs, Myron B. Marks, Ralph S. Marks, Mark

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Victor A. Bolden, United States District Judge The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “Commission” or “EEOC” or “Plaintiff’) brought this action against Day and Zimmerman NPS, Inc. (“DZNPS” or “Defendant”) under Title V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”). ECF No. 1. In October of 2012, Gregory Marsh filed a charge

Appellant was convicted of capital murder.1 After the jury found appellant guilty and answered the two special issues submitted under Article 37.071, V.A.C.C.P., the court imposed the death penalty as required by law. V.T.C.A., Penal Code, § 12.31. Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction or the affirmative answer

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), entered May 19, 1986, as, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant Jamaica Hospital, Inc., and against them. *87Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appea

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated March 7, 1989, which granted the petition. *592Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the proceeding is dismissed. The record indicates th

394 F.Supp. 1166 (1975) Jeffrey CLARK, Plaintiff, v. Leroy ZIMMERMAN, District Attorney of Dauphin County, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 75-443. United States District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania. May 7, 1975. *1167 *1168 *1169 *1

428 F.Supp. 759 (1977) John R. ZIMMERMAN, and Billie Zimmerman, Plaintiffs, v. U. S. District Judge Adrian A. SPEARS, Jr., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. SA-76-CA-260. United States District Court, W. D. Texas, San Antonio Division. January 3, 1977. *760 John R. Zimmerman and Billie Zimmerman, pro se. John E. Clark, U. S. At

387 F.Supp. 829 (1974) CLASSIC DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. Leroy S. ZIMMERMAN, Individually and in his official capacity as District Attorney of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, et al. Civ. No. 74-340. United States District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania. October 18, 1974. *830 Richard Friedman, Harrisburg, Pa., Burton W. Sandler, Towson, Md.

HORTON, Acting Chief Judge. This is a joint appeal from a final decree in a mortgage foreclosure. The appellants *433Mitchell were the original owners and mortgagors and the appellants Zimmerman were their grantees. The Mitchells were permitted to intervene and file defensive pleadings to the complaint of the appellee Hill. The basis upon which the appellants seek rev

Per Curiam. The decree appealed from is affirmed upon the grounds stated by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, who delivered the following opinion: This is a bill filed by the receiver of the Celluloid Emery Wheel Company against Daniel Pierson, Jr., and Albert C. Courter, two of its directors, and against the Electric Emery Wheel Company, a corporation of which Pierson and Courter are directors and stockholders.</

830 A.2d 28 (2003) 2003 VT 44 STATE of Vermont v. Carolyn THERRIEN and the Estate of Andrew Therrien v. Gregory Howe. No. 02-108. Supreme Court of Vermont. May 16, 2003. Motion for Reargument Denied June 16, 2003. *30 Leslie C. Pratt, Montpelier, for Defendants/Third-Party Plaintif

841 F.Supp. 19 (1994) Monica NEWTON, Plaintiff, v. CBS, INC., Defendant. Civ. No. 93-0785 (CRR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 4, 1994. *20 David M. Melnick, Rockville, MD, for plaintiff. Stuart Fries Pierson, Caryn L. Zimmerman, of Davis Wright Tremaine, of Washington, DC, Michael Reiss, of D

JUSTICE BOWMAN delivered the opinion of the court: The City of Loves Park (City) appeals a decision by the State Panel of the Illinois Labor Relations Board (Board) finding that the City committed an unfair labor practice by repudiating the terms of its collective bargaining agreement (Agreement) with the International Union

[Cite as Jones v. Jones, 2022-Ohio-1986.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY ANDREW JONES, : Appellant, : CASE NO. CA2021-05-045 : OPINION - vs -

689 S.E.2d 576 (2010) BAILEY AND ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner, v. WILMINGTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and City of Wilmington, Respondents, and John Blackwell and wife, Eliza Blackwell; Victor Byrd and wife, Carolyn Byrd; Vishak Das and wife, Tracy Das; Bill Dobo and wife, Barbie Dobo; Bob Dobo and wife, Jean Dobo; Barbie Dobo; Butch Dobo and wife, Shelly Dobo; Patrick Edwards and wife, Kim Edwards; Matt Epstein and Nina Brown; Earl Galleher and wi

[Cite as Weese v. Dalton, 2023-Ohio-3905.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAM WEESE : JUDGES: : Hon. John W. Wise, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. : Hon. Andre

WARD, Judge. The Board of Trustees of Spring Hill College brought suit to recover inheritance taxes paid under protest to the City of New Orleans. Spring Hill seeks recovery of $11,024.06 which the City collected pursuant to Section 28A-2(d) of the New Orleans City Code (Ordinance 11,262). The trial court sustained the City’s exception of no cause of action. The Board of Trustees appealed that ruling. They argue that the City

[Cite as Resor v. Dicke, 2023-Ohio-4087.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT AUGLAIZE COUNTY ANTHONY RESOR, ET AL., CASE NO. 2-22-28 PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GLORIA A. DICKE, ET AL., OPINION DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. Appeal from Auglaize County Common Pleas Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Sands v. Culotta, 2018-Ohio-4272.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO ex rel. : PER CURIAM OPINION JOSEPH A. SANDS, : Relator,

[Cite as Deere & Co. v. Brown, 2022-Ohio-1898.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLERMONT COUNTY DEERE & COMPANY, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2021-12-069 : OPINION - vs -