Cases

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1095 Doc: 49 Filed: 03/28/2024 Pg: 1 of 97 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1095 RODNEY D. PIERCE; MOSES MATTHEWS, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BO

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge, dissenting: . With respect, I dissent from the majority’s holding that the district court erred in rejecting Plaintiffs’ equal protection challenge to twin presumptively constitutional redistricting plans. Plaintiffs’ one person, one vote claim rests on their contention that improper “partisanship” rendered the challenged redistricting plans unconstitutional, even though those

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. In 2015, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law that, among other things, prohibited the citizens of Greensboro, alone among municipal citizens in the state, from participating in municipal initiatives or referendums.1 The City of *695Greensboro

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that the votes of all citizens have equal weight. A state violates this rule, known as the one-person, one-vote principle, when it places voters into electoral districts of materially different population size for no legitimate reason. Even smal

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CATHERINE C. EAGLES, District Judge. In early July 2015, the North Carolina General Assembly passed a law that restructures both Greensboro city elections and the form of Greensboro city government. Many changes will take effect for the upcoming 2015 municipal elections, and others will go into effect in December 2015. The City of Greensboro and six of its citizens h

*72EDMUNDS, Justice. In this case, plaintiff Willie Gilbert, a licensed attorney, alleges that defendant North Carolina State Bar acted vindictively when it filed sequential actions against him. The questions before this Court are whether plaintiff’s complaint properly presents a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of his right to due process under the Fourteent

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United States District Judge Plaintiffs, individual voters registered in Wake County, North Carolina and the Raleigh Wake Citizens Association (“RWCA”), an organization dedicated to the interests of African-Americans in Wake County, (collectively “plaintiffs”) challenge the North Carolina General Assembly’s (“General Assembly”) 2013 redistricting plan for electing the Wake Cou

*120 HUNTER, Robert C., Judge. The State of North Carolina (“the State”), the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”), and the North Carolina Department of Administration (collectively “defendants”) appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss. Can Am South, LLC (“plaintiff

902 F.2d 1134 Barney K. HUANG, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINAand Its Constituent Institution, North CarolinaState University; Bruce R. Poulton;F.J. Humenik, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-1374. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued Feb. 5, 1990.Decided May 4, 1990.As Amended May

MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, dissenting: North Carolina has enacted, within the bounds of the First Amendment, a cam- . paign finance law that is aimed at promoting transparency and openness in the electoral processes of that state. Today the majority strikes down key provisions in that law and severely restricts the well-established power of a state to regulate its elections. One result will be that organizations and

367 F.Supp.2d 945 (2005) In re SUBPOENA TO UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL Recording Industry Association of America v. University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill. In re Subpoena to North Carolina State University Recording Industry Association of America v. North Carolina State University. No. 1:03MC138, No. 1:03MC139. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina.

USCA11 Case: 22-11707 Document: 152-3 Date Filed: 08/28/2024 Page: 1 of 173 In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11707 ____________________ PAUL A. EKNES-TUCKER, Rev., BRIANNA BOE, individually and on behalf of her

In this case we consider whether an administrative law judge properly allowed the North Carolina Shellfish Growers Association and the North Carolina Coastal Federation to intervene with full rights as parties in a contested case challenge to the State's imposition of a civil penalty. While the parties characterize this question as a policy issue, it is properly considered as a procedural matter within our statutory framework governing intervention. Because we hold that the intervenor

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 7091545 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST

ACCEPTED 03-15-00007-CV 7091444 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 15-25-00108-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/20/2025 4:46 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE NO. ____________ CLERK FILED IN

430 S.E.2d 681 (1993) 110 N.C. App. 506 GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Jeanette Pippin, Pat Edwards, Sue Farlow, Sheila Green, Natalie Jackson, John Parks, and Anita Sharpe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, the Guilford County Board of Commissioners, the Greensboro City Board of Education, and the High Point City Board of Education, Defendants-Appellees. No. 9218S

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge SPENCER joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Chief Judge: Critical Health initiated arbitration proceedings against Smith Barney before the American Arbitration Association (AAA). Smith Barney seeks to enjoin the AAA proceedin

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 316PA22 Filed 21 March 2025 JOSEPH LANNAN and LANDRY KUEHN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, known and distinguished by the name of THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, a body politic and corporate On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision

151 F.Supp.2d 661 (2001) NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR TRANSPORTATION REFORM, INC.; and Friends of Forsyth County, an unincorporated association; Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; Rodney E. Slater, Secretary of United States Department of Transportation; Federal Highway Administration; Kenneth R. Wykle, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration; Nicholas L. Graf, Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration; N