Cases

1 Reported in 109 P.2d 322. Plaintiff brought suit to recover upon two accident insurance policies. Trial to a jury resulted in a verdict in plaintiff's favor. Defendant interposed motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. The court granted the former motion and denied the latter. Judgment of dismissal was accordingly entered, and plaintiff appealed.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Docket No. 20 EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sanford Wishnev (“Wishnev”) filed this lawsuit against Defendant the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Northwestern Mutual”), asserting that Defendant violated California’s usury law by charging him compo

ORDER We ask the California Súpreme Court to resolve two open questions of state law that have significant effects on insurance companies and insureds in California. An initiative measure enacted in 1918 (the Initiative), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1916-1

USCA11 Case: 20-13477 Date Filed: 05/31/2022 Page: 1 of 16 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-13477 ____________________ JEFFREY A. COCHRAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, Chief Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment, ECF Nos. 47 and 49, and a related Motion to Strike, ECF No. 67. The Court heard oral argument on the motions on January *117012, 2015, in Richland,

307 F.Supp.2d 325 (2004) Anne "Juni" PIERCE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY No. CIV. 03-435-JD. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. March 5, 2004. *326 David L. Nixon, Nixon, Raiche, Manning, Casinghino & Leach, Manchester, NH, for Plaintiff. William D. Pandolph, Sulloway & Hollis, Concord, NH, f

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

OPINION HORN, Judge. “While in some eases, ‘timing is everything,’ here timing is the only thing....”1 FINDINGS OF FACT The plaintiff, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (MassMutual), on behalf of itself, and as successor to Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company (ConnMutual), brought this claim to recover funds allegedly ove

ORDER ALAIMO, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................249 DISCUSSION..................................................................251 I. Theories of Liability in the Case ..............................................251 A. Failure to Disclose

ROBIN F. WYNNE, Associate Justice hRandeep S. Mann appeals following entry of an order by the Crittenden County Circuit Court granting partial summary judgment in favor of Dr, Trent Pierce and Melissa Pierce as to liability for tort claims the Pierces brought against Mann. A. jury subsequently determined that the Pierces had sustained damages in the amount of $122,600,000, and the circuit court entere

*4Justice Blackmun delivered the opinion of the Court. This case is yet another that presents a challenge to a punitive damages award. I In 1981, Lemmie L. Ruffin, Jr., was an Alabama-licensed agent for petitioner Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company. He also was a licensed agent for Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company.

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs who suffered dismissals in two separate securities-fraud cases asked the district courts to reinstate their claims under § 27A(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa-l(b), which Congress enacted in November 1991. The district courts denied these motions after holding that § 27A(b) violates the Constitution by disturbing final judgmen

MEMORANDUM** Sandra and Leonard Jeong, as trustees of their father’s trust, sued Minnesota Mu*449tual for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing for denying their claims on their father’s life insurance policy. The case was tried to a jury, which found for Minnesota Mutual. They appeal the judgment of th

83 Cal.App.2d 1 (1947) MAYNARD GARRISON, as Insurance Commissioner, etc., Petitioner, v. THE PACIFIC MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA (a Corporation), Respondent; JOHN HARNISH et al., Appellants. Civ. No. 16018. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two. Dec. 19, 1947. Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp and Peery Price for Petitioner.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT ALAN L. CERF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER INFANTE, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Alan L. Cerf has filed an expedited motion for a protective order (1) precluding Plaintiff Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company from taking the depositions of third-party witnesses Sandra Clam-age, Rick Anzalone, Georg

SUMMARY ORDER I. Choice of Law Because this is a diversity case, the forum state’s choice of law rules govern. Krauss v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co., 643 F.2d 98, 100 (2d Cir.1981). Under New York conflict of law principles, fraud claims are governed by the state in which the injury is deemed to have occurred, which is usually where the plaintiff is located, Sack v. Low, 478 F.2d 360, 366 (2d Cir.1973

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This securities class action was brought against Pacific Investment Management Company, LLC (“PIMCO”), PIMCO Funds (the “Trust”), and seven of PIM-*1210CO’s employees (“the Trustees,” together with PIMCO and the Trust, “D

112 F.Supp.2d 292 (2000) NATIONAL WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Defendant. No. 93 CIV. 7244 VM. United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 16, 2000. *293 *294 *295

TANG, Circuit Judge: Southern Pacific (SP) appeals from denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict in a suit brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (1982), by the widow and children of William Pierce, a deceased employee of the railroad. The suit alleged SP’s negligence caused Pierce’s death, which occurred two days aft

212 B.R. 549 (1997) In re PIERCE MORTUARY COLLEGES, INC., Debtor. In re PROFESSIONAL TRAINING SCHOOLS, INC., Debtor. MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., American Standard Lloyd's Insurance Company, Amerisure Lloyd's Insurance Co., Employer's Fire Insurance Co., and Guaranty National Insurance Co. Plaintiffs, v. Pat W. FORREST, Jerre Kauck, Grace S. Self, Virginia Henderson, Betty J. Standridge, Frederick Bjerke, Jack Muse, Roger Scarlotti, Nan