Cases

397 F.Supp.2d 935 (2005) Joel WHITEHOUSE, Eliana Whitehouse, and Justin Whitehouse, minor children of Joel Whitehouse, Plaintiffs, v. Mayor John PIAZZA, Chief of Police, Kevin Shaughnessy, Unknown Lemont Police Officers, and the Village of Lemont, Defendants. No. 05 C 1638. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 25, 2005.

EDMONDS, S. J., dissenting. Plaintiff alleges that the Zone defendants1 negligently caused her decedent’s death on January 24, 2009, by allowing her decedent, a club patron, to stand outside the club in a cordoned-off line of people awaiting entrance into the club. The area where the decedent was standing is in a public area within the City of Portland’s entertainment district in Old

Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge In his Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff Paul Wheeler renews his claims against Defendants Peter Piazza, Sydney Roberts, Donnelle Grygiel, and Elmer Garza (collectively "Defendants") for conspiring to and then violating his First Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

BREWER, J. The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. Balmer, C. J., dissented and filed an opinion, in which Landau, J., joined. *61BREWER, J. In this negligence action, plaintiff, th

58 July 21, 2016 No. 50 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Patricia PIAZZA, acting on behalf of Farley Piazza and Associates and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Martha Paz De Noboa Delgado, deceased, Respondent on Review, v. Bryan KELLIM, dba 99 Pawn & Guns,

253 S.W.3d 790 (2008) Camil IBRAHIM a/k/a Camil Kreit and Dr. Camil Kreit, M.D., P.A., Appellants, v. Linda YOUNG, Appellee. No. 11-06-00149-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. February 22, 2008. Rehearing Overruled April 10, 2008. *795 Cynthia Perlman, Maurice Bresenhan, Jr., Janna I. Lindig, Pascal Paul Pi

J-S54002-19 J-S54003-19 2022 PA Super 130 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : : : BRENDAN PATRICK YOUNG

J-S54002-19 J-S54003-19 2022 PA Super 220 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : v. : : BRENDAN PATRICK YOUNG : No. 2088 MDA 2018 Appeal from the Order Entered November 21, 2

615 F.3d 59 (2010) John YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert MURPHY, Jr., Superintendent, Massachusetts Treatment Center, Respondent-Appellee. No. 09-1685. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard June 7, 2010. Decided August 10, 2010. *60 Michael A. Nam-Krane on brief for appellant. Eva M. B

J. BRUCE NACCARI, Judge Pro Tem. This is an appeal from a sentence that the defendant contends is excessive. We affirm. On November 3, 1983, a St. John Parish Grand Jury returned an indictment charging Gene Piazza with four (4) counts of Indecent Behavior with Juveniles, in violation of LSA R.S. 14:81. The defendant was arraigned on December 12, 1983, and represented by retained counsel, pled not guilty to the charges. On

496 So.2d 1229 (1986) STATE of Louisiana v. Gene PIAZZA. No. 86-KA-124. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. October 14, 1986. Barry J. Landry, Becnel, Landry & Becnel, Reserve, for Gene Piazza defendant-appellant. William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., New Orleans, for State plaintiff-appellee. Before GRISBAUM and WICKER, JJ., and NACCARI, J.

BOWES, Judge, dissenting. At the onset, I must state that I abhor the nature of the crime of which the defendant stands convicted. However, no matter how repugnant the nature of a crime, each defendant has specific constitutional rights which must be properly protected. Several aspects of this case deeply disturb me, which lead to my thorough review of this record. Although, unfortunate

Betty C. Dickey, Justice. On January 20, 1999, Ernest Young underwent an esophagogastroduoenoscopy (EGD) at the Gastro-Intestinal Center (Center), a free-standing endoscopy center in Little Rock, Arkansas. Dr. Debra Morrison, M.D., performed this first procedure, telling Mr. Young that he would be sedated with the prescription medications Valium and Demerol. Dr. Morrison explained that, because he was to r

151 N.J. Super. 209 (1977) 376 A.2d 955 FRANCES KATTERMANN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SALVATORE DI PIAZZA AND ANTONINA DI PIAZZA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 6, 1977. Decided June 30, 1977. *211 Before Judges BISCHOFF, MORGAN and KING. Mr. P

871 F.Supp. 772 (1994) Richard YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. David LARKIN, et al., Defendants. No. 3:CV-93-0247. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. September 30, 1994. *773 *774 Richard Young, pro se. Amy Zapp, Office of Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, PA, for defendants. <

Young. V. The Hartford Insurance CV-11-240-JL 3/16/12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Benjamin Young and Kathy Young v. Civil No. ll-cv-240-JL Opinion No. 2012 DNH 056 The Hartford Insurance Company MEMORANDUM ORDER This is a dispute over the scope of liability coverage under a homeowners' insurance policy issued to p

Judgment of the County Court of Kings county, convicting defendant of the crime of extortion, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 60 The defendant was charged by indictment found and returned by the grand jury of Glenn County with the crime of murder and upon a trial before a petit jury in the superior court of said county was found guilty of the crime of manslaughter. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion f

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county reversed upon the law and the facts, indictment dismissed and defendant discharged from custody. There is no proof that defendant was in possession of the revolver at the time it was found by the police officers. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Walker, Chancellor. The petition in this case alleges that on August 5th, 1920, a form of ceremony of marriage took place between the petitioner and defendant in the city of New York; that at that time the-petitioner was incapable of consenting thereto, being a person of feeble and unsound mind, bereft of reason to truly comprehend the nature of the marriage contract and deprived of will to give-