Cases

PRESIDING JUSTICE GEIGER delivered the opinion of the court: The respondents, A.W and W.W, appeal from the October 7, 1997, and February 18, 1998, orders of the circuit court of Kendall County terminating their parental rights to their minor child W.L.W. Ill and appointing the Illinois Department of Children an

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE, WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON _______________________________________________________ FILED ) October 1, 1997 ANTHONY EARL McCANN and ) Dyer County Chancery Court CYNTHIA McCANN, ) No. 95A1 Cecil Crowson, Jr. )

*1236 OPINION AND ORDER CLAIRE V. EAGAN, District Judge. Now before the Court are the Motion of William A. Veitch for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Ownership of Petrohunter Energy, Inc. and Related Properties and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 119) and KT Capital and Steven Simonyi-Gindele’s Joint Motion and Brief for Partial Summary Judgm

181 S.W.3d 324 (2005) Phyllis A. YOUNG v. TAYLOR-WHITE, LLC. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville. September 8, 2005 Session. October 20, 2005. *326 Daniel R. Goodge and Alexandra S. Deas, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellant, Taylor-White, LLC. Terry E. Hurst and Brad L. Davidson, Newport, Tennessee, for the Appell

Wiggins, J. ¶1 The plaintiff in this medical malpractice case asks us to decide that a physician-patient relationship is formed when a patient enters into a written contract with a clinic and that written contract names a specific physician as the patient’s doctor. We do not reach this issue because the jury instructions allowed the plaintiff to argue her theory of the case and the jury found that the defendant was not negligent.

552 N.W.2d 1 (1996) 453 Mich. 308 Sheila WHITE, Personal Representative of the Estate of Phoebe Obleton, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith D. BEASLEY, Defendant-Appellant, and Hope Humbert and Ronald Johnson, Defendants. Docket No. 101350, Calendar No. 5. Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued January 10, 1996. Decided August 1, 1996

FILED 17-0818 12/22/2017 11:17 AM tex-21458098 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHOR

F ll,_E IN CLERKS O'PICI ~ This opinion was filed for record at~ ~EMF:! CCURT, rmal CIP'MIIIIIIIftll MAR 1 2 Z0151 . DATE lrla~J.¥ Supreme Court Clark IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON PHYLLIS PAETSCH, )

821 F.Supp.2d 1122 (2011) Phyllis WEHLAGE, on her behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. EMPRES HEALTHCARE INC., et al., Defendants. No. 10-05839 CW. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 31, 2011. *1123 Aaron Thomas Winn, Christopher J. Healey, Luce Forward Hamilton Scripps, San Diego,

55 P.3d 968 (2002) 132 N.M. 756 2002-NMSC-031 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason DESNOYERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 26,379. Supreme Court of New Mexico. September 24, 2002. *972 Phyllis H. Subin, Chief Public Defender, Will O'Connell, Assistant Appellate Defender, Sa

799 N.E.2d 1135 (2003) Henry K. BAKER and Phyllis J. Baker, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. HEYE-AMERICA, Appellee-Defendant, Emhart Glass Manufacturing, Inc., Defendant. No. 27A02-0306-CV-523. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 9, 2003. Transfer Denied March 19, 2004. *1137 Daniel J. Harrigan, Bayliff, Harrigan

860 A.2d 967 (2004) 373 N.J. Super. 93 Phyllis BATKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAYREVILLE DEMOCRATIC ORGANIZATION, Defendant-Respondent. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 28, 2004. Decided November 18, 2004. *968 Philip G. George argued the cause for appellant (Eric M. Berns

920 N.E.2d 494 (2009) Heather JOHNSTON, William Johnston and Jane Johnston, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Andrew WEIL, Sean McCann, Dorothy B. Johnson, Marta Coblitz, Burton Hochbert, Karen Pinkert-Lieb, Andrea Muchin, Debra DiMaggio and Leslie Fineberg, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1-08-2861. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. December 2, 2009. <

POOLER, Circuit Judge: This case concerns a securities class action settlement agreement' with American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”). Like many disputes over finite settlements, this case concerns who gets a “slice” of the settlement “pie.” Appellants American International Group, Inc. Incentive Savings Plan (the “AIG ISP”), American General Agents’ and Managers’ Thrift Plan (the “Thrift Plan”), American International Gro

JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Justices Thomas, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion. Chief Justice Kilbride dissented, with opinion. Justice Theis took no part in the decision. OPINION

102 B.R. 703 (1988) In re Chris A. HULVEY, Debtor. Joe MILLER, James Ardis and Jerry Dwyer, Plaintiffs, v. Chris A. HULVEY, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 87-82080, Adv. No. 87-8275. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois. May 24, 1988. *704 James S. Brannon, Peoria, Ill., for debtor/defendant. Robert D. Gaubas, Peor

DEITS, J. Defendant appeals a summary judgment for plaintiffs in this action for damages for breach of a sharecrop agreement. We affirm. Plaintiffs and defendant each owned an undivided one-third interest in farm property. Plaintiffs had a sharecrop agreement with defendant, allowing him to farm the property as a tenant and to retain two-thirds of the proceeds of the crops. The remaining one-third was divide

THIRD DIVISION December 2, 2009 No. 1-08-2861 HEATHER JOHNSTON, WILLIAM JOHNSTON ) Appeal from the and JANE JOHNSTON, ) Circuit Court of ) Cook County. Plaintiffs-App

85 F.Supp.2d 800 (1999) COMMUNITY INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff,[1] v. Jessica Lynn ROWE, et al., Defendants. No. C-3-98-422. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. August 12, 1999. *801 *802 Daniel T Downey, Kreiner & Peters Co., L.P.A., Dublin, OH, for Community

DENNIS R. BAGNERIS, SR.,'Judge. | TDefendant, Philip Gibson, appeals his conviction on charges of exploitation of persons with infirmities, a violation of La. R.S. 14:93.4. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. STATEMENT OF CASE On June 16, 2011, the defendant, Philip Gibson, was indicted on one count of exploitation of the infirmed, in violation of La. R.S. 14:93.4. The indictment a