Cases

Polygenis v Stone Lounge Press, Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 02373) Polygenis v Stone Lounge Press, Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 02373 Decided on April 12, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

MEMORANDUM DECISION Catherine J. Furay, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge This is a tale of two views of the same transaction. Debtor First Phoenix-Weston, LLC (“Weston”) borrowed $14,694,599.73 from Sabra Phoenix TRS Venture, LLC (“Sabra Phoenix”) in November of 2013. The transaction was documented by a Loan Agreement, Note, and Mortgage. In addition, an Option Agreement was executed the same day between Weston and

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: January 26, 2017 4 NO. S-1-SC-35512 5 PHOENIX FUNDING, LLC, 6 Plaintiff-Respondent, 7 v. 8 AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC and 9 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION 10 SYSTEMS, INC., 11 Defendants-Petitioners. 12 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI 13 Francis J. Matthew, District Judge 14 Murr Siler & Accomazzo, P.C. 15 Joshua A. Spencer 16 Albuquerque, NM 17 Jamie G. Siler 18 James

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 11:33:43 2017.03.08 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE

OPINION TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: This defamation action arises out of a business dispute between companies that design and distribute hygiene products for prisoners. One of those companies, Loops, designed a flexible toothbrush made for safe use in prisons and then bid on a contract with the New York City Department of Corrections (“NYC-DOC”). The other c

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PUENTE, an Arizona nonprofit No. 22-15344 corporation; PODER IN ACTION, an Arizona nonprofit corporation; IRA YEDLIN; JANET TRAVIS; D.C. No. 2:18-cv- CYNTHIA GUILLEN; JACINTA 02778-JJT GONZALEZ GOODMAN, individually and as class representatives, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation; MICHAEL

OPINION HOWE, Judge: ¶ 1 Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. and John D’Anna (collectively, “PNI”) seek special action relief from the trial court’s order denying its motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. PNI argues that because the affidavit accompanying the subpoena for D’Anna’s interview notes did not satisfy Arizona’s Media Subpoena Law, A.R.S. § 12-2214, PNI was not required to disclose the information to Gary

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiff Service By Air, Inc. (“SBA”) brings this action against Defendants Phoenix Cartage and Air Freight, LLC, Philippe Gabay, and Radiant Logistics, Inc. Before the Court are Radiant’s motion to dismiss [37] and Phoenix and Ga-bay’s motion to dismiss [40]. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion in

ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge Defendant City of Phoenix has passed an ordinance regulating pet stores (“the Ordinance”). Under the Ordinance, pet stores may not sell dogs or cats obtained from persons or companies that breed animals. Pet stores may sell only animals obtained from animal shelters or rescue organizations. Puppies ’N Love operates a pet store in Phoenix that sells

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Jan 20 2016, 10:35 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE Thomas F. Bedsole

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LAURA GONZALEZ, individually No. 24-2510 and on behalf of the statutory D.C. No. beneficiaries of Ramon Timothy 2:21-cv-01340- Lopez, and in her capacity as the MTL-DMF Personal Representative of the estate of Ramon Timothy Lopez, Plaintiff

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa, United States District Judge *793This putative class action arises out of Defendant GoDaddy.com LLC's ("GoDaddy") alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. ("TCPA"), which

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA BRUSH & NIB STUDIO, LC, ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, V. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. CV-18-0176-PR Filed September 16, 2019 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA BRUSH & NIB STUDIO, LC, ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, V. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. CV-18-0176-PR Filed September 16, 2019 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT McMAHON, District Judge: Plaintiffs Martin Fleisher (“Fleisher”), as Trustee of the Michael Moss Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust II, and Jonathan Berck (“Berck,” and, together with Fleisher, “Plaintiffs”), as Trustee of the John L.

ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Mark Schellenbach and William Ryder, on behalf of themselves and a pro*618posed class and subclass, bring this action against Defendant GoDaddy.com, LLC. Docs. 1, 33. Plaintiffs move to certify a class and subclass of persons who purchased a “Dedicated Server” from GoDaddy, alleging t

ORDER Honorable G. Murray Snow, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiffs Arizona Republic, Associated Press, Guardian News & Media LLC, KPHO Broadcasting Corporation, KPNX-TV Channel 12, and Star Publishing Company (Doc. 43), and the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Charles L. Ryan (Doc. 45). For the following reasons, the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: The plaintiffs in this case asserted claims against a number of defendants under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and Illinois law. When a Cook County property owner fails to pay property taxes on time, the past due tax becomes a lien on the property in favor of the County. The County sells the

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2022 VT 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) PHOENIX HERPETOLOGICAL ) SOCIETY, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 19-cv-007