⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Phillips v. State of Nevada”

Phillips v. Statepublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 2018-02-26 · Published · cited 0× · 413 P.3d 837
DISMISSED.
Phillips v. Nevadapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1992-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 504 U.S. 912
Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
Phillips v. Nevadapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1992-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 504 U.S. 912; 112 S. Ct. 1946
Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 380 F. App'x 608
MEMORANDUM *** This case concerns disciplinary sanctions imposed against plaintiff Kevin Lucey for incidents occurring while he was enrolled as a student at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (“UNLV’) during the fall 2006 semester. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of Lucey’s due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising out of the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 380 F. App'x 608
MEMORANDUM *** This case concerns disciplinary sanctions imposed against plaintiff Kevin Lucey for incidents occurring while he was enrolled as a student at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (“UNLV’) during the fall 2006 semester. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of Lucey’s due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising out of the
Phillips v. Statepublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 2005-09-15 · Published · cited 7× · 119 P.3d 711; 121 Nev. 591; 121 Nev. Adv. Rep. 58; 2005 Nev. LEXIS 66
Rose, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in the reversal of the extortion convictions for the reason stated, but I would also reverse the aggravated stalking charges and dissuading a witness from testifying because I do not believe the prior bad act evidence that was improperly admitted was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The State’s first
Nevada Supreme Court · 2013-03-28 · Published · cited 17× · 129 Nev. 154; 299 P.3d 354; 129 Nev. Adv. Rep. 16; 2013 WL 1278191; 2013 Nev. LEXIS 20
Saitta, J., concurring: Though I agree with the majority’s ultimate conclusion, I write separately in order to voice my concerns with the current judicial campaign contribution rules. The error asserted in this case clearly does not rise to a level that violates either party’s due process right to a fair trial before a fair tribunal. Further, as discussed by the majority, the contributions made to Judge Gonz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-08-02 · Published · cited 290× · 616 F.3d 963; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15968; 2010 WL 2991397
Opinion by Judge THOMAS; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge B. FLETCHER. OPINION THOMAS, Circuit Judge: Megan Krainski appeals the district court’s dismissal of her Section 1983 action against the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (“UNLV”)1 and various UNLV employees (“UNLV Employees”)2 in their
Nevada Supreme Court · 2006-02-09 · Published · cited 15× · 127 P.3d 528; 122 Nev. 120; 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 12; 2006 Nev. LEXIS 13
127 P.3d 528 (2006) Maria A. CABLE; Timothy Cristilli; Jeanette M. Diserio; Theresa J. Harvey; Frances A. Hunter; Henry J. James; Timothy Jones; Karen Kloepfer; Sharon Kodak; William C. Mitchell; William A. Mulholland; Monica C. Pike; Christine A. Romero; Robert Andres; Barbara M. Arnal; Irene Artz; Eve Buckingham; Luisa Carpenelli; Janice Doering; Cheryl Fleming-Wolfe; Merl Fullenwider; Mark Gangestad; Susan Haas; Nancy Jennings; David Johnson; Audrey K
Nevada Supreme Court · 2021-01-22 · Published · cited 0× · 479 P.3d 225
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA BRYAN PHILLIP BONHAM, No. 82313 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA; NEVADA FILED DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JAN 2 2 2021 DIRECTOR JAMES DZURENDA; AND À. SIRC.:14:71 BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., WARDEN,
Nevada Supreme Court · 2020-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 464 P.3d 402; 2020 NV 30
136 Nev., Advance Opinion SO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA LYNN R. SHOEN, No. 79288 Petitioner, vs. FILE STATE BAR OF NEVADA, Respondent. MAY 2 8 2020
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-06-12 · Published · cited 2× · 140 F.4th 1069
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TRACEY L. BROWN, No. 23-15594 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:19-cv-02000- JAD-DJA ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA; RONALD OLIVER, OPINION Respondents-Appe
Nevada Supreme Court · 2022-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TODD MATTHEW PHILLIPS, No. 82414 Appellant, FILE vs. APR 2 9 2022 AMBER PHILLIPS, N/K/A AMBER
District Court, D. Nevada · 2001-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 175 F. Supp. 2d 1255; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21800
AMENDED ORDER EDWARD C. REED, Jr., District Judge. The order of the court filed November 13, 2001 (# 202), is amended to read as follows: BACKGROUND On July 12, 2000, the Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California (hereinafter “the Tribe”) filed a motion to dismiss Brooks’ counterclaims (# 123). Donald E. Brooks
Phillips v. Nevadapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1971-06-21 · Published · cited 1× · 403 U.S. 940; 91 S. Ct. 2260
Sup. Ct. Nev. Cer-tiorari. denied. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Nevada Supreme Court · 2022-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TODD MATTHEW PHILLIPS, No. 82414 Appellant, FILED vs. AMBER PHILLIPS, N/K/A AMBER APR 2 9 2022 KORPAK, EUZABEDI A. BR
Nevada Supreme Court · 2019-10-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TODD MATTHEW PHILLIPS, No. 78959 Appellant, vs. AMBER PHILLIPS, Respondent. FILED r:CT 1 8 20
Nevada Supreme Court · 2021-01-08 · Published · cited 0× · 478 P.3d 400
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ANTOINE D. PHILLIPS, No. 82168 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE FILED DEPARTMENT, Respondents. JAN 0
Phillips v. Statepublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 1990-11-28 · Published · cited 6× · 801 P.2d 1363; 106 Nev. 763; 1990 Nev. LEXIS 149
801 P.2d 1363 (1990) Anthony PHILLIPS and Michael Perry, Appellants, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 20527. Supreme Court of Nevada. November 28, 1990. *1364 Rick Lawton, Public Defender, Fallon, for appellant Phillips. John R.S. McCormick, Fallon, for appellant Perry. Kevin Pasquale, Dist. Atty., Robert V.
Nevada Supreme Court · 2020-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 459 P.3d 239
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DAMIEN ALEXANDER PHILLIPS, No. 78270 A/K/A TRAVIS ALEXANDER PHILLIPS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, A 0 ';rn Res • ondent. ELIZ 'k. f:TICW