Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Phillips v. Social Security”
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SARA LIOI, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp II (Doc. No. 24) with respect to plaintiffs request for judicial review of defendant’s denial of his claim for supplemental security income benefits (“SSI”) and for remand to the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) for further proceedings. Plaintiff filed an objecti
544 U.S. 1054 PHILLIPSv.BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. No. 04-9468. Supreme Court of United States. May 23, 2005. 1 C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 113 Fed. Appx. 644.
*762MEMORANDUM** Melvin Phillips appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Because Phillips engaged in substantial gainful activity for several years prior to applying for child disability.. insurance benefits, he was not continuously disabled since age 22 and accordingly is not e
Salmon v. Social Security Administrationpublic domain
663 F.3d 1378 (2011) Victoria V. SALMON, Petitioner, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. No. 2011-3029. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 9, 2011. *1379 Phillip R. Kete, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. *1380 Hillary A. Stern, Senior Trial Cou
Williams v. Social Security Administrationpublic domain
586 F.3d 1365 (2009) Stephen E. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. No. 2009-3020. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. November 9, 2009. Phillip R. Kete, American Federation of Government Employees Local 1923, of Baltimore, MD, argued for petitioner. Jacob A. Schunk, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, C
Williams-Carter v. Social Security Administrationpublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Williams v. Social Security Administrationpublic domain
ORDER Petitioner having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The court’s November 25, 2008 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the petition for review is reinstated. (2) Respondent’s brief is due on or before December 22, 2008.
Greenstreet v. Social Security Administrationpublic domain
543 F.3d 705 (2008) Lance GREENSTREET, Petitioner, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. No. 2007-3312. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 24, 2008. Phillip R. Kete, American Federation of Government Employees, of Baltimore, MD, argued for petitioner. Dawn S. Conrad, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division
Josephine L. Cage v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Josephine L. Cage appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Michael A. Telesca, Judge) upholding a decision by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) of the Social Security Administration (the “SSA”) denying Cage’s application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefi
Phillips v. Colvinpublic domain
Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 20 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment in this Social Security appeal. Plaintiff Alonzo Phillips suffers from a variety of impairments and believes that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) err
AMENDED MEMORANDUM* The ALJ’s conclusion that Peck does not suffer from a severe mental impairment is supported by substantial evi*584dence on the record as a whole. See Andrews v. Shalala, 53 F.3d 1035, 1040 (9th Cir.1995). The ALJ permissibly credited the opinion of one treating physician, Dr. Hortareas, over that of another, Dr. Soscia.
Phillips v. Colvinpublic domain
ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND DIRECTING AWARD OF BENEFITS BLACKBURN, District Judge. The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],1 filed June 21, 2013, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claims for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
Clemons v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
PER CURIAM. Phillip A. Clemons seeks review of the magistrate judge’s order* affirming the Commissioner’s denial of Social Security disability insurance benefits to Clemons prior to August 10, 1997, based on its finding that Clemons was not totally disabled until that date. We review the Commissioner’s final decision to determine whether it is supported by substantial evidence and whether the corre
Phillips v. Astruepublic domain
ENTRY ON JUDICIAL REVIEW TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge. Plaintiff, Sonja M. Phillips (“Ms. Phillips”), requests judicial review of the decision of Defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”), denying Ms. Phillips’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). For the reasons set forth below, the Commissioner’s decision is AFF
Phillips v. Astruepublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Phillips v. Astruepublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 422 Fed. Appx. 528.
Phillips v. Astruepublic domain
ORDER Marla Phillips applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, claiming that she was disabled by major depression, borderline personality disorder, and other physical impairments. The Social Security Administration denied her claim, and a magistrate judge, presiding by consent, upheld the agency’s decision. Phillips appeals, arguing primarily that the Administrative Law Judge erred by discounting the
Phillips v. Astruepublic domain
601 F.Supp.2d 1020 (2009) Margaret PHILLIPS, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No. 08 C 3137. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 6, 2009. *1022 Nastassia G. Johnson, Barry A. Schultz, The Law Offices of Barry A. Schultz, P.C., Evanston, IL, for Clai
Parish v. Commissioner of Social Securitypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAMMY ELIZABETHE P., 1 Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-cv-3693-RMM KILOLO KIJAZAKI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Tammy Elizabethe P. brought this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review
Gary Phillips v. Carolyn W. Colvinpublic domain
SMITH, Circuit Judge. The Social Security Administration (SSA) redetermined Gary Phillips’s eligibility for supplemental security income (SSI) benefits and concluded that he was no longer eligible to receive them. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) concluded that Phillips’s disability ended on February 1, 2008. Phillips exhausted his administrative remedies and then sought review