Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Phillips v. Oklahoma State of”
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Phillipspublic domain
175 P.3d 353 (2007) 2007 OK 70 STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Janet Bickel PHILLIPS, Respondent. No. SCBD No. 5285. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. September 25, 2007. ORDER APPROVING RESIGNATION FROM OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION PENDING DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ¶ 1 Upon consideration of the Oklahoma Bar Ass
STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OBA v. SPIELMANpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OBA v. SPIELMAN STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OBA v. SPIELMAN2025 OK 94Case Number: SCBD-8022Decided: 12/15/2025THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2025 OK 94, __ P.3d __ FOR PUBLICATION IN OBJ ONLY. NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Phillipspublic domain
KAUGER, J. ¶ 1 The complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar Association), charged the respondent, David C. Phillips III, with four *1032counts of professional misconduct: misappropriation of funds;1 mismanagement of a trust account;2 misrepresentation in the investigative proceedings;3
Pollock v. Phillips (In re Phillips)public domain
TERRENCE L. MICHAEL, Chief Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION Complex problems can have simple solutions. Moreover, what appears complicated at first blush is not always so. In this adversary proceeding, the parties have made various and sundry accusations of fraud, misconduct, and other misdealings. The allegations of malfeasance have not been limited to the parties; counsel have taken their best shots at each other
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
SIERRA CLUB v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:SIERRA CLUB v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OFFILLpublic domain
ORDER IMPOSING FINAL DISCIPLINE OF DISBARMENT T1 This Court suspended Respondent from the practice of law on November 22, 2010. We based this action upon his conviction in the United States District Court for *407 the Eastern District of Virginia on nine counts of wire fraud and a single count of conspiracy t
KAUGER, J., with whom WATT, J. joins, concurring in part/dissenting in part: T1 I do not agree that the proceeding at issue is "more akin to legislation than to adjudication." Nearly 100 years ago, the United States Supreme Court in Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co., 211 U.S. 210, 29 S.Ct. 67, 58 L.Ed. 150 (1908) discussed the proceedings of the Virginia State Corporation Co
Phillips v. Oklahomapublic domain
Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Phillips v. Statepublic domain
59 P.3d 516 (2002) 2002 OK CR 37 Cody Tyler PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. F 2002-0775. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. November 20, 2002. *517 ORDER DENYING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO HOLD YOUTHFUL OFFENDER APPEAL IN ABEYANCE AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO