Cases

186 Cal.App.4th 475 (2010) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JASON TROY PHILLIPS, Defendant and Appellant. No. F058534. Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District. July 2, 2010. *476 Richard Jay Moller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General,

INGRAHAM, District Judge. Action for declaratory judgment to establish in plaintiff a right to repurchase real property from the United States of America under Section 23(d) of the Surplus Property Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 765, which was repealed by Section 502(a) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949. 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1632. The case is before the court upon defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack

GOODE, J. The petitioner, George Orey, seeks by a writ of habeas corpus issued from this court to obtain the custody of his daughter Georgia, a child born October 2, 1908, and hence a few days over a year old. On May 5, 1909, Mary Orey, mother of the child and wife of the petitioner, placed the child in the Children’s Home Society of Missouri, a corporation chartered under the laws of the State, with power, under certain circums

Complainant moves to strike the answer and counter-claim of the defendant, her husband, filed to her bill against him founded on a separation agreement. The parties had separated before 1928 when they entered into the agreement. Thereby they each consented that they should continue to live separate and apart, and the husband agreed to pay to his wife $50 weekly, until her death or remarriage, in full satisfaction of all claims for maintenance and support. Defendant has so fallen behind

The facts leading up to this appeal may be thus stated: On February 2d 1932, a bill of complaint was filed in the Circuit Court for Washington County by M.P. Moller, Inc., against the M.P. Moller Company. The bill states that the plaintiff is a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland, with its principal office in Hagerstown, Washington County, Maryland, that it sues for itself as well as for all other creditors of the defendant, which is also a corporation incorp

PER CURIAM. The district court granted a motion of the defendant, who is appellee here, to dismiss the appellant’s complaint on the ground that the complaint did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Harrison v. Phillips, D.C., 185 F.Supp. 204. We are in agreement with the conclusion reached by the district court and

Laughlin, J. This is an action for a divorce. The defendant appeared and by Ms answer denied the material allegations of the complaint. By consent, the issues were referred to a referee to hear, try and determine. The referée found the controverted facts in favor of the plaintiff, and directed judgment dissolving the marriage, and awarding to the.plaintiff the costs of the action and alimony at the rate of $4,000 per annum. This

673 N.W.2d 859 (2004) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Lance Phillip WICKNER, Appellant. No. C4-03-215. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. January 27, 2004. *860 Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Kelly O'Neill Moller, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Timothy R. Faver, Beltrami County Attorney, Bemidji, MN, for respondent.<

736 N.W.2d 636 (2007) STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Edward Richard KRASKY, Respondent. No. A04-2011. Supreme Court of Minnesota. August 9, 2007. *638 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Kelly O'Neill Moller, Asst. Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, Boyd Beccue, Kandiyohi County Attorney, Willmar, MN, for appellant. Mary M. Mc

CALABRIA, Judge. Defendants appeal from multiple orders and judgments entered by the trial court in favor of plaintiffs on claims involving the restrictive covenants governing the Gull Harbor subdivision (“Gull Harbor”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand. I. Factual and Procedural Background On 11 April 1972, developer Walton W. Smith (“Smith”) acquired a large

Eldon E. Fallon, U.S. District Court Judge *623Before the Court are two motions to dismiss without prejudice filed by Plaintiffs *624Herman LeBlanc, R. Doc. 569, and Donnie Beasley, R. Doc. 572. The motions are opposed. R. Doc. 579. Plaintiffs have filed a reply. R. Doc. 590. Havin

OPINION PER CURIAM: ; The United States appeals judgments awarding damages to Randy Musgrove and to the administratrix of the estate of William Miller for injuries caused by live trivalent and polio vaccine approved by the Department of Biological Services (DBS) in violation of pertinent regulations. Infants who had been vaccinated with live polio vaccine transmitted type III, crippling poliomyelitis to t

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VICTORIA NEYLON, Plaintiff, V. C.A. No. N17C-10-368 JRJ DAVID ZABEL, M.D. and ZABEL PLASTIC & RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: January 17, 2020 Date Decided: October 23, 2020 Upon Defendants David Zabel, M.D. and Zabel Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or Alternatively Motion in Limine to Submit to the Jury Questions of Joint Tortfeasor Liability and Judgment Credit: DENIED.

24-681 Miller v. McDonald In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit _________________ August Term 2024 Argued: November 18, 2024 Decided: March 3, 2025 Docket No. 24-681 JOSEPH MILLER, EZRA WENGERD,

The complaint in six of the eight counts alleges that the defendant Roderick LeBron was the president and principal stockholder of the defendant LeBron, Inc., a Nebraska corporation, which was engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing certain electronic games. On March 8, 1973, at a trade fair conducted in Rocky Hill, Connecticut, for the purpose of promoting the distribution of those games by certain employees or agents of those defendants, the plaintiffs signed contracts for

The complaint in six of the eight counts alleges that the defendant Roderick LeBron was the president and principal stockholder of the defendant LeBron, Inc., a Nebraska corporation, which was engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing certain electronic games. On March 8, 1973, at a trade fair conducted in Rocky Hill, Connecticut, for the purpose of promoting the distribution of those games by certain employees or agents of those defendants, the plaintiffs signed contracts for

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hancock County; John S. Morris, Chancellor. Before INZER, P. J., and SMITH and BROOM, JJ. Reversed and remanded. GILLESPIE, C. J., PATTERSON, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and LEE, JJ., concur.

OPINION AND ORDER KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motions of Comair, Inc., et al. (“Comair”) [DE # 539] and Bombardier, Inc. (“Bombardier”) [DE #736] pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss claims by various Plain*669tiffs for loss of consortium, pre-impact fear, and hedonic and loss of enjoyment

Corrigan, J. *415 **1202 Ten days after he was released from the California Youth Authority, defendant Grayland Winbush murdered a young woman in her home during a robbery. The victim was beat

Edwards, Senior Circuit Judge: In 2004, Appellants, John Wayne Scantlebury ("Scantlebury") and Sean Gaskin ("Gaskin"), who are residents of Barbados, along with another Barbadian resident - Frederick Christopher Hawkesworth ("Hawkesworth") - and two Guyanese residents, were indicted by a grand jury in Washington, D.C., for conspiracy to traffic cocaine. Scantlebury, Gaskin, and Hawkeswo