⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “Phillips, Jr. v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.”

District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2013-07-09 · Published · cited 0× · 42 F. Supp. 3d 1197; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189206; 2013 WL 10002076
ORDER BETH PHILLIPS, District Judge. This case comes before the Court on Plaintiff Harrington Enterprises, Inc.’s Motion to Remand. (Doc. 13.) Harrington argues the amount in controversy in this putative class does not exceed the Class Action Fairness Act’s (CAFA) $5 million jurisdictional threshold. Defendant Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc. opposes. Remand will be denied.
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003-02-10 · Published · cited 12× · 286 F. Supp. 2d 707; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18491; 2003 WL 22300503
286 F.Supp.2d 707 (2003) Kevin SMITH, et al. Plaintiffs. v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al. Defendants. No. CIV.A.3:02CV 25. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 10, 2003. *708 *709 *710 Charles Lewis Williams, Butler,
Brown v. Amespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000-02-07 · Published · cited 7× · 201 F.3d 654; 53 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1676; 28 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2288; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1597; 2000 WL 48992
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: Appellants Collectibles and Ames principally appeal the district court’s determination that appellees’ state law claims for violation of their rights of publicity are not preempted by the Copyright Act. The misappropriation consisted of appellants’ unauthorized use of appellees’ names and likenesses to market appellees’ musical performances on CD’s
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Tractor Supply Company, Appellant, v. South Carolina Department of Revenue, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2024-000013 Appeal From The Administrative Law Court Ralph King Anderson, III, Administrative Law Judge Opinion No. 6148 Heard September 9, 2025 – F
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-06-27 · Published · cited 30× · 143 F.4th 306
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0170p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN │ DEGRAND; DANIEL DRAIN; WAVERS SMITH; RICHARD
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015-11-25 · Published · cited 277× · 809 F.3d 134; 2015 WL 6873190
KING, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Although there are approximately 11.3 million removable aliens in this country today, for the last several years Congress has provided the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with only enough resources to remove approximately 400,000 of those aliens per year-.1 Recognizing DHS’s congressionally granted prosecuto-rial discretion to set removal enfo
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015-11-09 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 15-40238 Document: 00513264640 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/09/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals __________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 15-40238 November 9, 2015