Cases

ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-4233 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BILLY CURRY, JR., Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

29 F.3d 1062 63 USLW 2116, 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 1772 Philip BARTLING; Lee E. Anthony; Jim Anon; DavidArmstrong; Carl Benefield; James Bushu; Don Capper;Howard Collingsworth; Ron Craig; Lloyd Daugherty; NelsonDeane; Jerry DeMent; Larry Donohue; Richard Dawson;Philip Edwards; Sam Egger; James Fairchild; WilliamEinnell; Melvin Foster; Ernest Frazier; LaRue Gregory;Thedore Grin

12/05/2019 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 3, 2019 Session JEFFERY TODD BURKE v. SPARTA NEWSPAPERS, INC. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for White County No. CC-2605 Amy V. Hollars, Judge

Cornelia A. Clark, J. We granted review of this interlocutory appeal arising from a defamation action to address whether the Court of Appeals correctly determined that (1) a showing of malice cannot defeat the fair report privilege and (2) an assertion of the fair report privilege exempts the defendants from part of the protections of Tennessee Code Annotated section 24-1-208, Tennesse

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

OPINION PRICE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which KELLER, P.J., and WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, COCHRAN, and ALCALA, JJ., joined. The appellant was convicted of the offenses of (1) money laundering of funds of an aggregate value of $190,000, a first-degree felony at the time,1 and (2) conspiracy to commit money lau

OPINION PRICE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which KELLER, P.J., and WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, COCHRAN, and ALCALA, JJ„ joined. The appellant was convicted of the. offenses of (1) money laundering of funds of an aggregate value of $190,000, a first-degree felony at the time, <

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALL PLAINTIFFS REPRESENTED BY JOHN DRISCOLL, Plaintiffs, v. No. 20-cv-622-ZMF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION From 2006 to 2011, sixty-three terrorist attacks on U.S. military service members and civilians in Iraq killed forty-six and seve

LEVINSON, Justice. These consolidated appeals oblige us to revisit Hawai'i Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 104 S.Ct. 2321, 81 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984), Hawai'i Housing Authority v. Lyman, 68 Haw. 56, 704 P.2d 888 (1985), and Takabuki v. Housing Finance and Development Corp., 72 Haw. 466, 822 P.2d 955 (1991), in order to address the question whether the Hawai'i Land Reform Act, Hawai'i Revised S

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1782 JIMMY EDWARDS; ROBERT HUNT; DOLORES HUNT; CLIFFORD MCKELLAR, JR.; EMMA MCKELLAR; ANTOINETTE MOORE; WEST LUMBERTON BAPTIST CHURCH; CURRIE CHAIN SAW, INCORPORATED; C.J.M. VENTURES, INCORPORATED; WILLIAM LOCKLEAR, d/b/a Stricklands’s Barbershop; TBL ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY, INCORPORATED; SAMMY

811 F.Supp. 367 (1993) Lawrence L. LANDRY, Philip M. Grace and Lawrence G. Martin, Liquidating Trustees, Plaintiffs, v. KEENE CORPORATION, Defendants. No. 91 C 2917. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. January 19, 1993. *368 Alfred B. Adams, III, Regina Benton Reid, Holly J.W. Huart, Branch, Pike, Ganz & O'Calla

OPINION LAWSON, District Judge. The plaintiff, Highland Capital, Inc. (Highland), appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its complaint against Franklin National Bank (the Bank) that was brought under the anti-tying provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act (BCHA), 12 U.S.C. § 1972. Highland asserted that the Bank required Highland to purchase stock in