Cases

Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 26, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00531-CV JON VAN NGUYEN, Appellant v. ALABAMA THAO PHAM, Appellee On Appeal from the 507th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Co

10 Cal.4th 743 (1995) 896 P.2d 807 42 Cal. Rptr.2d 81 DOYLE WATTS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GERTRUDE CRAWFORD, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. S035808. Supreme Court of California. July 6, 1995. *744 COUNSEL Carey & Carey, Jerry Y. Fong, Daniel S. Gonzale

288 F.3d 391 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA; Board Of Police Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles; City of Los Angeles Police Department, Defendants-Appellees,Los Angeles Police Protective League, Proposed Intervener-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,Michael Garcia; Ernesto Luevano; Duc Pham; Jesus Nieto; Salvador Salas; Robert Hernandez; Carlos Gonzalez; D

632 F.3d 938 (2011) SPECTRUM STORES, INC.; Major Oil Company, Inc.; W.C. Rice Oil Company; Fast Break Foods, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; Saudi Arabian Oil Company, doing business as Saudi Aramco; Saudi Petroleum International, Inc.; Aramco Services Company; Saudi Refining, Inc.; Motiva Enterprises, LLC; Petroleos De Venezuela SA; PDV America, Inc.; PDV Midwest Refining, LLC; PDV Holding, Inc.; Open Joint Stock Comp

State of Maryland v. Michael Eugene Stone, No. 16, September Term, 2025 FOURTH AMENDMENT – TRAFFIC STOP – REASONABLE SUSPICION – TEXTING WHILE DRIVING – Supreme Court of Maryland held that where conduct observed by officer is consistent with legal or illegal use of mobile phone, to justify traffic stop, police officer must be able to credibly identify specific facts, not applicable to general law-abiding public, “which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts,” Terry v. Ohio, 3

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or 12(b)(3) for improper venue. Dkt. # 24. Defendant argues that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over it because it is a non-resi

DENNIS MONTALI, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION In its May 1, 2019, Order Denying Rehearing ("the FERC Denial", the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") made two remarkable statements. First, it said: "Wholesale power contracts are not simple run-of-the-mill contracts between two private parties, rather, these contracts, while privately negotiated, implicate

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-KA-00331-COA CARLOS DOMINIQUE ALLEN A/K/A CARLOS APPELLANT ALLEN v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/31/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEWEY KEY ARTHUR COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: MADISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTOR

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Adobe Systems Inc. (“Adobe”) brings the instant lawsuit against Defendant Blue Source Group, Inc. (“Blue Source”), alleging causes of action for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114; false designation of origin, false or misleading advertising, and unfair eompetition, all in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); tradema

No. 121,092 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DAMEON V. BAUMGARNER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. In considering a challenge to the suffic

[Cite as State v. Roberts, 2024-Ohio-1604.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-220615 TRIAL NO. B-1904356 Plaintiff-Appellee, : O P I N I O N. vs.

09/26/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 13, 2019 Session PMFS H-VIEW I, LLC v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 17-1177-III Ellen H. Lyle, Chancellor

Adkins, J. Child custody and visitation decisions are among the most serious and complex decisions a court must make, with grave implications for all parties. The dissolution of a non-traditional marriage just compounds the difficulties of this already challenging inquiry. This appeal arises out of a divorce between a lesbian couple, and involves a dispute over one spouse’s right of access to a child conceived by artificial in

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

EDMONDSON, J., with whom GURICH, V.C.J., KAUGER, and WATT, JJ., join, concur by separate opinion. ¶ 1 I concur in the Court’s opinion and write to note the constitutionally flawed procedure used by the District Court and to provide a suggested procedure for similar cases. I also must also note for future similar cases the responsibility of the District Court in providing access of a video

KAUGER, J.,; 1 1 We retained this cause to address the dispositive issue of whether terminating a licensed practical nurse for missing work in a nursing center based on vomiting on the job and a doctor's note admitting that he should not work for three days due to an infection with influenza would violate public policy.1 We hold that it would, The public policy behind precluding a nursing home emp

04/17/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 8, 2019 Session DAYLE WARD, ET AL. v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 17-768-I Claudia Bonnyman, Chancellor

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00487-CR ___________________________ KODY AUSTIN LOTT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 30th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. 58029-A and On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1 Tarrant County, Texa

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I., II. and III. of the Discussion. OPINION Convicted of second degree robbery and placed on five years' probation, defendant Tacare Desean Paysinger appeals, arguing (1) the flight instruction the trial court gave (CALCRIM No. 372) was unconstitutional and not supporte

OPINION OF THE COURT Joan A. Madden, J. In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief and damages, plaintiff moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 6301 and 6311, preliminarily enjoining defendants from initiating eviction proceedings to remove him from his rent-stabilized apartment. The following facts are not disputed unless otherwise noted. Since 2002, plaintiff has been the tenant