Cases

[Re: ECF No. 81] *883AMENDED1 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION In this civil rights action, Chien Van Bui and Ai Huynh (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), the parents of decedent Vin

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-05-00902-CV WEEKS MARINE, INC., Appellant v. Enrique Jose VELA, Appellee From the 381st Judicial District Cour

*409ORDER Re: DISCOVERY MOTION OLGUIN, United States Magistrate Judge. The court has reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents (“Motion”), and concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve this matter. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac.

22 Cal.Rptr.3d 101 (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 1502 Charles LEAVITT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MADERA, Defendant and Respondent; Castle & Cooke California, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. No. F044068. Court of Appeal, Fifth District. November 3, 2004. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing Nove

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

WARD LAW, Circuit Judge: Does the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department (the “LASD”) in adopting and administering its policy of requiring that a records check, including review of all wants and holds received on a prisoner’s release date, act on behalf of the state of California or on behalf of the County of Los Angeles (the “County”)? The answer to this question determines whether the County may be subject to liability un

236 F.3d 552 (9th Cir. 2001) VALERIE STREIT, individually and as class representative; DIEGO SANTILLANA, individually and as class representative; MICHAEL ROERICH, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a governmental entity; JERRY HARPER, Undersheriff; MICHAEL GRAHAM, Assistant Sheriff; BARRY KING, Chief; BOB PASH, Chief; DANIEL BURT, Commander, Defendants-Appellants.EDDIE SHIELDS, individually and as a class repre

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Adobe Systems Inc. (“Adobe”) brings the instant lawsuit against Defendant Blue Source Group, Inc. (“Blue Source”), alleging causes of action for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114; false designation of origin, false or misleading advertising, and unfair eompetition, all in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); tradema

Filed 9/16/19 Modified and Certified for Publication 10/11/19 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN MARY MORRIS, B290693 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC612232) v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, Defendant and Responde

ORDER: 1. ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; [Doc. No. 67] 2. DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 44] IRMA E. GONZALEZ, District Judge. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks’s Report and Recommendation (“R & R”), [Doc. No. 67], recommending that the Court deny Plaintiffs motion for default judgment, [Doc. No. 44], The deadline for filing

Filed 1/11/21; Certified for Publication 2/1/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX KIEU HOANG, 2d Civil No. B302608 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2018- Plaintiff and Respondent, 00507910-CU-DF-VTA) (Ventura County)

*95ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Re: ECF No. 60 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Plaintiffs have brought this putative class action, alleging that Defendant Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”), which owns approximately 300 hotels spread across 38 states, has violated Title III of the Americans with Disabilit

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED and REMANDED IN PART and Opinion Filed December 23, 2020 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00744-CV ROBBIE LESA HAMES HORTON, Appellant V. KIMBERLY A. STOVALL, Appellee On

662 F.Supp.2d 1162 (2009) Rafael MADRIGAL, Petitioner, v. James YATES, Warden, Respondent. Case No. CV 07-7251-GAF (MLG). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. September 3, 2009. *1166 Eric S. Multhaup, Eric S. Multhaup Law Offices, Mill Valley, CA, Jan Stiglitz, Jeffrey Chinn, Justin Brooks, California

NUMBER 13-23-00210-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG FROLAMO, LLC, Appellant, v. ARTURO ORTEGA, 3BU FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, 533 PROPERTIES JOINT VENTURE, KENNETH HAUSENFLUCK, ALBERTO VELA, FREEDOM BANK, Appellees.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARCIA A. CRONE, District Judge Pending before the court is Defendant Associates First Capital Corporation’s (“Associates”) Motion for Summary Judgment (#36). Associates seeks summary judgment as to all claims asserted by Plaintiff The Note Investment Group, Inc. (“TNIG”). Having considered the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the

678 F.Supp.2d 961 (2008) Eneida AMPARAN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PLAZA HOME MORTGAGE, INC.; Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., Defendants. Case No. C 07-4498 JF (RS). United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. December 17, 2008. *965 David M. Arbogast

427 F.Supp.2d 737 (2006) Fermin COLINDRES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QUIETFLEX MANUFACTURING, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A. H-01-4319, CIV.A. H-01-4323. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 31, 2006. *738 *739 David G. Hinojosa, David Herrera Urias, Nina Perales, Ma

Filed 8/3/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE In re RICK RYAN FEBBO G057667 on Habeas Corpus. (Super. Ct. No. M-17593) OPINION Appeal from an order of t