Cases

ORDER LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge. This Court referred the case to United States Magistrate for the purpose of issuing a Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the Commissioner’s denial -of benefits be reversed and remanded for reconsideration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. A sentence four remand is proper when the district court 'mak

726 N.E.2d 318 (2000) Donald Lee PAUL; Judith Pfeiffer Paul; Robert W. Baird Co., Inc., a financial investment firm; and John Doe, closing agent for the sale of Defendants' real estate located at 7124 Paddlegate Court, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Appellants-Defendants, v. I.S.I. SERVICES, INC. and Tri-State Attorney Services, d/b/a I.S.I. Security, Appellees-Plaintiffs. No. 02A03-9904-CV-167. Court of Appeals

[Cite as State ex rel. Russell v. Yost, 2022-Ohio-4778.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Mark R. Russell, : Relator, : v. : No. 21AP-603 [Dave] Yost, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Respond

FIFTH DIVISION REESE, P. J., MARKLE and COLVIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL

Connor, Judge. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Stephen E. Aleshire, appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court, entered upon a jury verdict convicting appellant of operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited breath-alcohol concentration and operating a motor vehicle while impaired, and upon the court’s finding of guilt as to the offense of traveling the wrong way on a one-way street. For the following reasons,

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Suprem

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This is an action for a writ of prohibition to prevent respondents, the Ohio Oil and Gas Commission and three of its five members, from exercising jurisdiction in an appeal from the issuance by the chief of the Ohio Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management of a permit to relator, Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. (“Chesapeake”), to drill an oil and gas well, a

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, Senior United States District Judge Plaintiffs Citizens for Free Speech, LLC ("Citizens") and Michael Shaw ("Shaw") bring the instant action against the County of Alameda ("County") and County-related defendants, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to challenge Defendants' efforts to enforce cer

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the

615 S.E.2d 131 (2005) 273 Ga. App. 311 RABUN et al. v. McCOY. McCoy v. Rabun et al. Nos. A05A0055, A05A0056. Court of Appeals of Georgia. April 12, 2005. Reconsideration Denied May 19, 2005. Certiorari Denied October 3, 2005. *132 Richard R. Gignilliat, Amy S.

Kaye, J. (dissenting). The Appellate Division’s decision, reached entirely as a matter of law, upholds the right of a seller (defendant) offered a better price to escape payment of a fee to a real estate broker (plaintiff) who has produced a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase the property on the seller’s terms. In defendant’s words: “Marvin Billet testified (and the trial court and Appellate Division both found) that he did

OPINION HALPERN, Judge:* Respondent has determined a deficiency of $43,2371 in petitioners’ Federal income tax for 1985, together with additions to tax under sections 6653(a) and 6661 (since conceded by respondent). This case requires us to determine the taxability of an amount received in settlement of a suit brough

819 S.W.2d 900 (1991) SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Appellant, v. Willie Mae NICHOLS and Bill Nichols, Appellees. No. B14-90-00965-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). October 24, 1991. Rehearing Denied December 19, 1991. *901 Rick Gibson, Houston, for appellant. Gary Bowers, Humble, for appe

ESTATE OF BESSIE I. MUELLER, DECEASED, JOHN S. MUELLER, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentEstate of Mueller v. CommissionerDocket No. 2733-90.United States Tax Court

This appeal was first granted to the Supreme Court, but that court held that it did not have jurisdiction because the title to real estate was not directly involved; and that the record did not affirmatively show that the net value of testator's estate was in excess of $7500. Whereupon the cause was transferred to this court. (See The First National Bank of Kansas City v. Mathilda C. Schaake, et al., 200 S.W.2d 326.) The executors and trustee, The Fir

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: This is an interlocutory appeal presenting jurisdictional and liability issues in an action seeking shares of a $29.1 million judgment arising out of a settlement of land claims of certain groups of California Indians. We find jurisdiction, although on a different ground from that adopted by the trial court, but we reverse the court’s finding of liability

Andersen, J. Facts of Case The petitioner, an adjudged sexual psychopath, appeals from an order denying his release from custody and returning him to a state mental institution for continued treatment. When apprehended, the petitioner admitted having committed sexual offenses against children. He was initially charged with two counts of a morals offense for which, if convicted, he coul

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: This diversity action for the cancellation of two promissory notes on grounds of duress stems from a bitter family feud. Plaintiffs-appellants Fred Chouinard and his wife Ginger brought suit to set aside the two notes totalling $190,000 that they had executed to Al and Ed Chouinard, Fred’s father and twin

ETHRIDGE, Chief Justice: This is an action under the wrongful death statute. Miss.Code Ann. § 1453 (1964 Supp.). The jury rendered a verdict of $150,000 for plaintiffs-appellees, and defendants-appellants seek review of the judgment by the Circuit Court of Jones County, Second District. The issues are (1) whether a peremptory instruction “on liability,” in the light of all instructions adequately directed