Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (.Motion in Limine No. 9) JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge. Pending before the court is Boston Scientific Corporation’s (“BSC”) Motion in Limine to Preclude Any Evidence or Argument That Boston Scientific Owed 'or Breached a Duty to Warn Plaintiffs Directly (“Motion in Limine No. 9”). (See BSC’s Initial Mots, in Limine [Docket 3

Lourie, Circuit Judge. *792 Continental Circuits LLC appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona of noninfringement of the asserted claims of U.S. Patents 7,501,582 ("the '582 patent") ; 8,278,560 ("the '560 patent") ; 8,581,105 ("the '105 patent

ACCEPTED 14-14-00345-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:02:41 P

Case: 23-1639 Document: 70 Page: 1 Filed: 06/12/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. PNC BANK N.A., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2023-1639, 2023-1866, 2025-1276, 2025-1341 ______________________ App

dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would hold Code § 65.2-708(0 provides only one extension of the statute of limitations contained in Code § 65.2-708(A). Since the time provided by the statute of limitations, even with the extension contained in subsection (C), expired before Gordon filed his claim, I would hold Gordon’s claim time-barred. In relevant part, Code § 65.2-7

HUGHES, Circuit Judge. 3M sued TransWeb for infringement of several patents. TransWeb sued for declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of the patents. A jury found the patents to be invalid based on Tran-sWeb’s prior public use of the patented method. In accordance with an advisory verdict from the jury, the district court found the patents unenforceable due to

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 24-3108 AZADEH KHATIBI, M.D., an individual; DO NO HARM, a D.C. No. Virginia nonprofit corporation, 2:23-cv-06195- MRA-E Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OPINION RANDY HAWKINS, in

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1391 DOROTHY E. SMITH, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Julian Jackson Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCHLAGE LOCK COMPANY, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and AMETEK, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Haveg

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AZADEH KHATIBI, M.D., an No. 24-3108 individual; DO NO HARM, a D.C. No. Virginia nonprofit corporation, 2:23-cv-06195- MRA-E Plaintiffs - Appellants, Central District of

SELYA, Circuit Judge. *11This case implicates a plethora of issues arising in the shadow of the First Amendment. Most notably, it requires us to address the power of a court to impose a prior restraint in the form of a permanent injunction forbidding the publication of words-words that the court believes have been used to defame the plaintiff in

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Casper, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has filed this lawsuit against Defendants Texas Roadhouse, Inc., Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC and Texas Roadhouse Management Corp. (collectively, “Texas Roadhouse”) alleging a pattern or practice of age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employmen

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. On February 16, 2012, Magistrate Judge Jennifer Boal issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that this Court dismiss the plaintiffs’ federal claims and decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the pendant state-law claims. This Court finds the R & R to be thorough and well-reasoned and, accordingly, accepts and adopts it in

Nickerson, Gary A., J. The plaintiff, Josephine Bevilacqua (“Bevilacqua”) filed suit against Richard F. Eisen (“Dr. Eisen”) and Thermage, Inc. (“Thermage”) (collectively “the Defendants”), seeking damages under various theories for the disclosure and publication of photographs taken during her medical treatment. This matter is before the court on the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The court held a hearing on January 20,

MEMORANDUM OPINION Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge Over the past forty years, the White Marlin Open (‘WMO”) in Ocean City, Maryland has become the largest billfish fishing- tournament in the world. As in other big money fishing tournaments, WMO may require‘anglers winning top prizes to undergo polygraph examinations. In the 2016 WMp Tournament, Rule G.7 of the Tournament Rules specified th

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RYAN KARNOSKI; CATHRINE No. 18-35347 SCHMID, Staff Sergeant; D. L., FKA K. G., by his next friend D.C. No. and mother, LAURA GARZA; 2:17-cv-01297-MJP HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FUND; GENDER JUSTICE LEAGUE; LINDSEY MULLER, Chief Warrant Officer; TERECE LEWIS, Petty Officer First Class; PHILLIP STEPHENS, Petty Officer Second Class; MEGAN WINTERS, Petty Officer Seco

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MEMORANDUM, RECOMMENDATION, AND ORDER SIM LAKE, District Judge. Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum, Recommendation, and Order dated February 25, 2014,1 the court is of the opinion that said Memorandum, Recommendation, and Order should be adopted by this court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Mem

ISHEE, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. A jury sitting before the Hinds County Circuit Court found Natyyo Gray guilty of capital murder. The circuit court sentenced Gray to life in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC). Gray appeals. Finding no error, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶

FILED JUNE 9, 2020 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Ex Rel. )