⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Petroleum Kings v. United Metro Energy Corporation”

Texas Business Court · 2025-02-10 · Published · cited 2× · 2025 Tex. Bus. 5
FILED IN BUSINESS COURT OF TEXAS BEVERLY CRUMLEY, CLERK ENTERED 2/10/2025 2025 Tex. Bus. 5 The Business Court of Texas, 1st Division PRIMEXX ENERGY § OPPO
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2023-01-26 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued January 26, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00341-CV ——————————— PAKISTAN PETROLEUM LIMITED, Appellant V. SPECIALTY PROCESS EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, SPEC ENER
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-03-05 · Published · cited 25× · 291 F. Supp. 3d 509
JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. Before the Court are the motions of defendants Mercuria Energy Trading, Inc. ("METI"), Mercuria Energy Asset Management, BV ("Mercuria EAM"), Mercuria Capital Partners Ltd. ("Mercuria Capital"), Mercuria US Asset Holdings, LLC ("Mercuria US Holdings") (collectively, the "Mercuria Parties"), Upstream Latinoamérica, S.L. ("ULA"), and Phoenix Global Resources pic ("Phoenix Global") to dismiss plaintiff's five-co
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-01-15 · Published · cited 28× · 948 F.3d 261
Case: 18-20350 Document: 00515272644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 15, 2020 No. 18-20350
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-03-08 · Published · cited 5× · 543 S.W.3d 901
Motion for Rehearing Denied; Affirmed; and Substitute Opinion filed March 8, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00933-CV CENTRAL PETROLEUM LIMITED, Appellant V. GEOSCIENCE RESOURCE RECOVERY, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas
Washington Supreme Court · 2026-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON APRIL 30, 2026 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON APRIL 30, 2026 SARAH R. PENDLETON
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-12-19 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ohio 5953
[Cite as Dream Big Energy, L.L.C. v. Eclipse Resources-Ohio, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-5953.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DREAM BIG ENERGY, LLC JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-06-04 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA M3 USA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-2903 (RDM) v. SUMMER QAMOUM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff M3 USA Corporation (“M3”) brings this action against two of its former emp
District Court, D. Colorado · 2010-01-28 · Published · cited 2× · 666 F. Supp. 2d 1218
666 F.Supp.2d 1218 (2009) Jack J. GRYNBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. IVANHOE ENERGY, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-cv-02528-WDM-BNB. United States District Court, D. Colorado. September 30, 2009. As Corrected January 28, 2010. *1224 George Hanks Brown, Karl L. Schock, Amy L. Benson, Brownstein Hyatt
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-06-07 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA M3 USA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-2903 (RDM) v. SUMMER QAMOUM, et al., Defendants. AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Amending the memorandum opinion and order filed on June 4, 2021)
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-12-31 · Published · cited 21× · 312 F.R.D. 620; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175079; 2015 WL 9703298
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Class Certification, filed *623June 1, 2015 (Doc. 288)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on October 23, 2015. The primary issue is whether the Court should recons
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 24, 2017 Decided January 31, 2018 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Rehearing En Banc Theodore B. Olson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-03-19 · Published · cited 7× · 306 F.R.D. 312; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37256; 2015 WL 1321479
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004-04-30 · Published · cited 45× · 901 So. 2d 1; 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 819; 2004 Ala. LEXIS 106; 2004 WL 924138
901 So.2d 1 (2004) HUNT PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. STATE of Alabama. 1011762. Supreme Court of Alabama. April 30, 2004. Rehearing Denied November 24, 2004. Sam C. Pointer, Jr., and M. Christian King of Lightfoot, Franklin & White, L.L.C., Birmingham; and John N. Leach of Helmsing, Leach, Herlong, Newman & Rouse, P.C., Mobile, for appellant.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-01-30 · Published · cited 24× · 487 B.R. 375
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. This case involves a dispute over lobbying work done, first by the law firm of Coudert Brothers LLP (“Coudert”), and later, after Coudert’s bankruptcy, by the law firm of Baker & McKenzie LLP (“Baker”). This lobbying, done on behalf of various American coal companies, ultimately helped secure an act of Congress that resulted in substan
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-10-20 · Published · cited 12× · 507 S.W.3d 383; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 11372; 2016 WL 6110913
OPINION Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice Appellants, RSM Production Corp. and Jack Grynberg (collectively, “RSM”), sued appellee Global Petroleum Group, Ltd. (“Global”) and other entities for misappropriation of trade secrets and other claims based on the alleged misuse of certain seismic data. Global filed a special appearance, which the trial court granted. RS
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2011-02-18 · Published · cited 0× · 445 B.R. 382; 2011 WL 590434
445 B.R. 382 (2011) In re NORTH AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION USA, et al., Debtors. Compass Bank, Administrative Agent, as Successor in Interest to Guaranty Bank, FSB, And Texas Capital Bank, N.A., Co-Agent, Plaintiffs, v. North American Petroleum Corporation USA, Prize Petroleum LLC and Equal Energy U.S., Inc., as Successor to Altex Energy Corporation and Enterra Acquisitions Corp., Defendants. North American Petroleum Corporation USA,
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2000-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-98-630-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ RIO GRANDE VALLEY GAS CO., ET AL., Appellants,