Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Peterson v. United States”
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Jacobs-Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CLARK WADDOUPS, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 47) and plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 48.) A hearing on these motions was held on September 28, 2016, at which time the court took the matter under advisement. The court has carefully considered the memoranda and
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge. Plaintiff sustained injuries while serving on active duty in the M’izona Mr National Guard. He brings this suit alleging that the United States Mr Force (“Mr Force”) assigned him an erroneous disability rating, wrongfully discharged him from service, and denied him back pay. The parties filed cross-motions for judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Same case below, 632 F.3d 1038.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
774 F.Supp.2d 418 (2011) 2011 DNH 052 Harold PETERSON v. UNITED STATES of America et al. Civil No. 10-cv-170-JL. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. March 30, 2011. *420 Harold Peterson, Nashua, NH, pro se. Eric R. Womack, Washington, DC, T. David Plourde, U.S. Attorney's Office, Concord
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Same case below, 411 Fed. Appx. 857.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 607 F.3d 975.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
997 A.2d 682 (2010) Juan PETERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 07-CF-1344. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted April 13, 2010. Decided June 10, 2010. Sara E. Kopecki, Washington, DC, appointed by the court, was on the brief for appellant. Channing D. Phillips, Acting United States Attorney at the time the brief was
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM. ORDER The United States moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Jay Peterson’s appeal from the final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Peterson opposes. On July 2, 2009, 2009 WL 1979263, Court of Federal Claims issued a decision dismissing Peterson’s complaint with prejudice and entering judgment in favor of the United States. On September
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM. ORDER The United States moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Jay Peterson’s appeal from the final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Peterson opposes. On July 2, 2009, 2009 WL 1979263, Court of Federal Claims issued a decision dismissing Peterson’s complaint with prejudice and entering judgment in favor of the United States. On September
Peterson v. United Statespublic domain
469 F.Supp.2d 857 (2007) Shalay A. PETERSON, Individually and as Prochein Ami for Islam Y.I.S. Peterson, a Minor, and Dwight Peterson, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. CV No. 05-00465 DAE BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. January 12, 2007. *858 L. Richard Fried, Jr., John D. Thomas, Jr., Cronin. Fr