Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Peters v. Synchrony Bank, N.A.”
McMullen v. Synchrony Bankpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VALERIE MCMULLEN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 14-1983 (JEB) SYNCHRONY BANK, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This Opinion is the final chapter in the long-running suit brought by the Plaintiff class against banks, companies, and individuals related to
McMullen v. Synchrony Bankpublic domain
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge As we enter a new year, a top priority is often to get in better shape. Plaintiff Valerie McMullen had that same goal in 2010 and (unlike so many of us) actually followed through. After her favorite trainer left her gym, however, she sought a refund for unused sessions. What she received instead were two bills with new personal-training charges she claims she never incurred. After un
McMullen v. Synchrony Bankpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge While a gym membership typically improves one’s physical well-being at a slight cost to one’s fiscal health, the case at hand concerns a fitness endeavor that had a far greater impact on the wallet than the waistline. This suit alleges that fitness companies and two banks conspired to def
Anthony v. GE Capital Retail Bankpublic domain
ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge Plaintiff Frank Anthony ("Plaintiff"), pro se, brings this action against Defendant GE Capital Retail Bank, now known as Synchrony Bank ("Synchrony" or "Defendant"), alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq,<
State v. Wilcoxpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Wilcox, 2021-Ohio-2282.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-190495 TRIAL NO. B-1902165 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : O P I N I O N. QU
Kowalkowski-Tippett v. Tippettpublic domain
[Cite as Kowalkowski-Tippett v. Tippett, 2021-Ohio-4220.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Christine E. Kowalkowski-Tippett, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 20AP-228 v. : (C.P.C. No. 18DR-1326) Henry C. Tippett, Jr.,
Cogdell v. Murphypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LELAND L. COGDELL, JR., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 19-2462 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 52, 53
Zavadovsky v. Cheatlepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BORIS ZAVADOVSKY, et al., : : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 24-1997 (RC) : v. :
Mazie Green v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Malveaux, Ortiz and Causey PUBLISHED Argued at Lexington, Virginia MAZIE GREEN OPINION BY v. Record No. 0144-22-3 JUDGE DORIS HENDERSON CAUSEY FEBRUARY 20, 2024
Mazie Green v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCpublic domain
VIRGINIA: In the Court of Appeals of Virginia on Tuesday the 19th day of March, 2024. PUBLISHED Mazie Green, Appellant, against Record No. 0144-22-3 Circuit Court No. CL21000587-00 Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC,
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 21-1147 ____________ CITY OF WARREN POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant v. PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.; CHARLES F. LOWREY; KENNETH Y. TANJI; R
Set Capital LLC v. Credit Suisse Group AGpublic domain
19-3466 Set Capital LLC v. Credit Suisse Group AG In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM, 2019 ARGUED: APRIL 30, 2020 DECIDED: APRIL 27, 2021 No. 19-3466-cv SET CAPITAL LLC, STEFAN JAGER, NIKOLAY DROZHZHINOV, ALEKSANDR GAMBURG, ACM, LTD.,
Chesher v. 3M Co.public domain
ORDER DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on defendant Crane Co.’s (“Crane”) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the court denies Crane’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff James Wilson Chesher (“Chesher”), a former machinist mate and a commissioned officer in the U.S. Navy, together with his wife, plaintiff
Mazie Green v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Beales, Huff, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux, Athey, Fulton, PUBLISHED Ortiz, Causey, Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish, Callins, White and Frucci Argued at Richmond, Virginia MAZIE GREEN OPINION BY v. Record No. 0144-22-3
Newtyn Partners, LP v. Alliance Data Sys. Corp.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0017p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NEWTYN PARTNERS, LP; NEWTYN TE PARTNERS, LP, │ individually and on behalf
El-Sioufi v. ST. PETER'S UNIV.public domain
887 A.2d 1170 (2005) 382 N.J. Super. 145 Nagiba EL-SIOUFI, R.N. and Arlene Simpson, R.N., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ST. PETER'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and Jacqueline Carey, R.N., Defendants-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 20, 2004. Decided December 29, 2005. *1175
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. “If a contract is broken, the measure of damages generally is the same, whatever the cause of the breach. ”1 This is the second leg of a jurisprudential voyage having its genesis in a series of contracts entered into between the plaintiff, Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA or plaintiff), and the Department of Hou
In re Bospublic domain
JOINTLY ADMINISTERED FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM OPINION ON ALLEGED DEBTORS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS INVOLUNTARY PETITIONS (DOCS. *87021 & 15-30923: DOC. 27)1 Karen K. Specie, United States Bankruptcy Judge THIS CASE is before the Court on Chapter 7 Involuntary Petitions filed by
1 F.Supp.2d 635 (1998) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff v. EXXON CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 3:95-CV-1311-H, 3:95-CV-2537-H. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. April 10, 1998. *636 *637 Katherine Elizabeth Bissell, Jeffrey Charles Bannon,
M.H. Segan Ltd. Partnership v. Hasbro, Inc.public domain
924 F.Supp. 512 (1996) M.H. SEGAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. HASBRO, INC., Defendant. No. 95 CIV. 0583 (DLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 2, 1996. *513 *514 *515 Lawrence M. Segan, New York City, Martin B. Pavane, Cohen, Pontani