Cases

MEMORANDUM Sue L. Robinson, United States District Judge At Wilmington this 8th day of April, 2014, having reviewed the multiple motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the papers filed in connection therewith, and having heard oral argument on the same; the court issues its decision based on the following analysis: 1. Introduction. Plaintiff Data Speed Technolog

15 So.3d 289 (2009) LANTECH CONSTRUCTION CO., L.L.C. v. David SPEED d/b/a Driftwood Spur. No. 08-CA-811. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. May 26, 2009. *290 Patricia S. LeBlanc, LeBlanc Butler, LLC, Metairie, Louisiana, for Plaintiffs/Appellants. Leonard L. Levenson, Christian W. Helmke, Colleen B. Gannon, Atto

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY AND REPORT OF DONALD LEACH, II, AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................910 A. Factual Background For Summary Judgment...................

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART HTC’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT [Doc. No. 133] (2) DENYING HTC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT [Doc. No. 130] (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART HTC’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT OPINIONS OF JOSEPH GEMINI [Doc. No. 129] IRMAE. GONZALEZ, Chief Judge.

*7ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge. General Motors Corporation (GM) appeals from the judgment for Respondent, Randall Peters, in his individual capacity for his claim of loss of consortium and as next Mend for his wife, Constance Peters, on her products liability claims for damages, actual and punitive, as a result of an accident involving the Peters’ GM manufactured 1993 Oldsmobile

360 B.R. 369 (2007) In re HIGH VOLTAGE ENGINEERING CORPORATION, et al., Reorganized Debtors. No. 05-10787 JNF. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 19, 2007. *370 High Voltage Engineering Corp., New Kensington, PA, debtor pro se. Paula R.C. Bachtell, Department of Justice, Boston, MA, for John Fitzgerald, Assist

Case: 21-1998 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HULU, LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1998 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Di

Case: 21-1998 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HULU, LLC, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-1998 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Di

Case: 20-1441 Document: 89 Page: 1 Filed: 10/13/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MOBILITY WORKX, LLC, Appellant v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC, Appellee ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITE

363 B.R. 8 (2007) In re HIGH VOLTAGE ENGINEERING CORPORATION, et al., Reorganized Debtors. No. 04-11586 JNF. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. January 19, 2007. *9 *10 Peter D. Bilowz, Christian T. Haugsby, Christine D. Lynch, Douglas B. Rosner, Goulston & Storrs, P.C., Boston, MA,

Case: 20-1441 Document: 89 Page: 1 Filed: 10/13/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MOBILITY WORKX, LLC, Appellant v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC, Appellee ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITE

RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Google LLC's ("Google") Second Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 for Improper Venue. (Dkt. No. 125) ("the Motion"). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be D

Wallach, Circuit Judge. Appellee DISH Network ("Dish") sought inter partes review ("IPR") of claims 6, 11, 16, and 20 ("the Challenged Claims") of Appellant TQ Delta, LLC's *1353 ("TQ Delta")

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PETRUSS MEDIA GROUP, LLC : f/k/a TAKE 5 MEDIA GROUP, LLC, et al. : : Petitioners, : Civil Action No.: 22-3278 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 3, 1

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 22-CV-0274 & 22-CV-0301 FELICIA M. SONMEZ, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,

DENISE COTE, United States District Judge Defendants Costella Kirsch, Internap Corporation ("INAP"), Blue Chip Venture Company Ltd.1 and Blue Chip VI Extension Fund II LLC (the "Blue Chip Defendants"), have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P., to dismiss the claims against them in the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"). INAP and the Blue Chip Defendants have additionally moved to dismiss the

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: Google Play Store Antitrust No. 24-6256 Litigation D.C. Nos. ______________________________ 3:21-md-02981-JD _ 3:20-cv-05671-JD EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, OPINION Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GOOGLE LLC; GOOGL

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge, United States District Court Plaintiff 'Bakken Residential, LLC (“Bakken”) commenced this action on Oc*817tober 19, 2012, against Cahoon Enterprises, LLC, (“Cahoon”), several weeks after Cahoon declared that it considered a real estate purchase agreem

DIAZ, Circuit Judge: This case involves a contract dispute between a media company and a television distributor. In October 2007, Sky Angel U.S., LLC obtained nonexclusive distribution rights to Discovery Communications, LLC's television programming. The written contract contained a satisfaction clause allowing Discovery to terminate the agreement if at any time it became dissatisfied w

Santana v Peter Thomas Roth Labs LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 25142) [*1] Santana v Peter Thomas Roth Labs LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 25142 Decided on June 14, 2025 Supreme Court, Kings County Maslow, J. Published by New