Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant Dallas County, Texas (“Dallas County”), alleging that it violated their Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by refusing to grant them immediate release on bond and by detaining them based on immigration holds after they were otherwise el

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ERIC B. DARNELL, § No. 08-16-00282-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v.

398 B.R. 69 (2008) In re PUIG, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 07-14026-BKC-RAM. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. July 31, 2008. *70 Debi Evans Galler, Esq., Jordi Guso, Esq., Paul Steven Singerman, Esq., Miami, FL, Grace E. Robson, John D. Eaton, Esq., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Debtor. Betty Blanco, Esq., Miami, FL, for Pe

*1052 DYK, Circuit Judge. AngioScore, Inc. (“AngioScore”) claims exclusive ownership of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,080,026 (“the '026 patent”), 8,454,636 (“the '636 patent”), and 8,721,667 (“the '667 patent”) (collectively, “the AngioScore patents”). TriReme Medical, LLC (“TriReme”), claiming to have received

FEDERICO A. MORENO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Appellant's Notice of Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (D.E. 1) , filed on May 9, 2018. THE COURT has considered the briefs and the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robson Xavier Gomes v. Civil No. 20-cv-453-LM Opinion No. 2020 DNH 081 US Department of Homeland Security, Acting Secretary et. al. O R D E R Approximately 75 detainees being held in jail in Dover, New Hampshire bring this class action seeking emergency relief due to the risk o

RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge On November 20, 2017, the United States, acting through the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division ("plaintiff or "the Government"), brought this action to enjoin the merger of defendants AT & T/DirecTV and Time Warner (collectively, "defendants") under Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA AEROGROW INTERNATIONAL, INC.; No. 83835 CHRIS HAGEDORN; CORY MILLER; PATRICIA M. ZIEGLER; H. MACGREGOR CLARKE; DAVID B. KENT; SMG GROWING MEDIA, INC.; rm, AGI ACQUISITION SUB, INC.; THE i F fe i} SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY; : JAMES HAGEDORN; AND PETER JUN 30 2022 SUPRON, | ELIZABETH A. BROWN Petitioners CLERK OF SUPREME COURT , BY -Yo. VS. DEPUTY CLERK THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND TH

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROBSON, Senior District Judge. This cause is before the court on defendants’ Fidel Ghini’s, the City of Highwood’s, Charles Sheahan’s, Mark Hall’s, Frank Reinier’s and Other Unknown Members of the Highwood Police Department’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motion shall be granted. The co

RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge If there ever were an antitrust case where the parties had a dramatically different assessment of the current state of the relevant market and a fundamentally different vision of its future development, this is the one. Small wonder it had to go to trial! *164On November 20, 2017, t

Memorandum re Attorneys’ Fees ALAN JAROSLOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge. After several hearings, the court granted the Chapter 7 trustee’s motion to assume a real property lease. The lessors asserted, as part of the cost of curing defaults, that they recover their reasonable attorneys’ fees. The trustee has objected, arguing that there is no basis for the award of attorneys’ fees as part of the cost of as

373 B.R. 773 (2007) In re PAN AMERICAN HOSPITAL CORPORATION Pan American Medical Centers, Inc., Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 04-11819-BKC-AJC, 04-11820-BKC-AJC. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. July 17, 2007. Grisel Alonso, Esq, Miami, FL, Patricia M. Arias, Esq, Miami, FL, Gregory P. Borgognoni, Miami, FL, William L. Blagg, Esq, Miami, FL, Leyza Fl

OPINION Opinion by: CATHERINE STONE, Chief Justice. This appeal arises from disputes regarding a testamentary trust established by Willa Peters Hubberd. Willa’s daughter, *361 Mary Dahlman, is a beneficiary under the trust. Dahlman appeals the probate c

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge. Plaintiff Kathleen D. Gates brings this fair debt collection action against Defendants MCT Group, Inc. and the Law Offices of Peter W. Singer. The parties have filed motions for summary judgment. See

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge On February 23, 2015, the court entered a Protective Order Governing Confidential Material that places strict limits on who may receive documents designated as “Confidential Material.” ECF # 25 (“Protective Order”).’ As presently drawn, the Protective Order does not grant

Order on Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss State Law Claims; Motions for Summary Judgment on State Law Claims; Motions in Limine re State Law Experts YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge Now before the Court are three categories of motions: (1) defendants’ motion to dismiss the state law claims in this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (2) the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on s

ORDER After a two-day trial in this ease, we issued an opinion upholding Wisconsin’s new congressional and legislative districts in all but one respect. We concluded that, as drawn in Act 43, Assembly Districts 8 and 9 violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and had to be redrawn. Baldus v. Members of Wisconsin Government Accountability Bd., 849 F.Supp.2d 840, 859-60, 2012 WL 983685, *17 (E.D.Wis. Mar. 22, 2012). On

ORDER DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge, J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge, and ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Judge. In our decision issued on March 22, 2012, we held that Act 43 violates the Voting Rights Act (VRA), and enjoined the Government Accountability Board from implementing the Act until such time as the VRA violations were appropriately addressed by the Wisconsin Legislature (Legislature). (Docket # 2

(2008) DIRECTV, INC., Plaintiff v. Eugene Michael WALSH Jr., Defendant. No. 3:CV-05-0826. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. February 13, 2008. MEMORANDUM THOMAS I. VANASKIE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc.'s ("DTV") Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. Entry 163.) DTV filed a comp

ORDER J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge. Quite clearly, the Wisconsin State Senate and Wisconsin State Assembly (collectively, “the Legislature”) and its attorneys are none too pleased with this three-judge Court’s prior orders, filed on December 8, 2011, 2011 WL 6122542 and December 20, 2011, 2011 WL 6385645 respectively. By those orders, this Court twice held that neither Joe Handrick, a lobbyist hired