Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
10 opinions for “Peter Kalivas”
Wilder v. World of Boxing LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE World of Boxing LLC, and Alexander Povetkin (collectively, “WOB”) move in li-mine to exclude at trial the testimony of John Wirt, an attorney for Deontay Wilder and DiBella Entertainment, Inc. (collectively, “Wilder”).1 For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND<
Wilder v. World of Boxing LLCpublic domain
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This case consists of two consolidated actions relating to a heavyweight championship boxing match that was supposed to occur on May 21, 2016, but that never took place. Heavyweight boxing champion Deontay Wilder and DiBella Entertainment, Inc. ("DBE") claim that boxer Alexander Povetkin, who tested positive for a banned substance right before the match was to take place, and Wor
Ortega v. Rhone-Poulenc of Wyoming, L.P.public domain
842 F.Supp. 488 (1994) Bernice ORTEGA, Plaintiff, v. RHONE-POULENC OF WYOMING, L.P., and Richi Kalivas, Defendants. No. 92-CV-0013-B. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. January 22, 1994. *489 Bruce S. Asay, Cheyenne, WY, for plaintiff. Brent R. Kunz, Cheyenne, WY, for defendant Rhone-Poulenc. Peter K. Michael
Memorandum Order DAVID STEWART CERCONE, District Judge. The above captioned cases were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate' Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Local Rules of Court for Magistrate Judges. In these actions, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, Babcock & Wilcox ' Power Generation Group; Inc., B &
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROBERT C. MITCHELL, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs bring these actions alleging that Defendants, Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc., B & W Technical Services, Inc. and Atlantic Richfield Co., as successors in interest to the Nuclear Materials Corporation (“NUMEC”), are responsible for the release of radioactive, hazardous and toxic subst
In re M.P.public domain
Filed 8/3/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE In re M.P. et al., Persons No. B306181 Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 18CCJP08047A–B) D.P. et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS A
Erickson v. Superior Court of Placer Cty.public domain
55 Cal.App.4th 755 (1997) JEFFREY AARON ERICKSON, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PLACER COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. C024719. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. June 9, 1997. *756 COUNSEL Ronald J. Peters and David W. Dratman for Petitioner. Lyle Rose, County
53 Cal.App.4th 152 (1997) CONTRACTORS LABOR POOL, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WESTWAY CONTRACTORS, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents; AMERICAN BONDING CO., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. B091490. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. February 28, 1997. *155 COUNSEL McDonough, Ho
Montanaro Bros. Builders, Inc. v. Snowpublic domain
190 Conn. 481 (1983) MONTANARO BROTHERS BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. v. MAURICE M. SNOW ET AL. (10933) Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued April 8, 1983. Decision released June 21, 1983. PETERS, HEALEY, PARSKEY, SHEA and GRILLO, JS. *482 Daniel Shepro, with whom, on the brief, was Allan J. Rosen,
RENDLEN, Judge, dissenting. For the reasons here discussed, I respectfully dissent. In this action for mandamus and prohibition originally brought in the Court of Appeals, Southern District, that Court issued its preliminary rule in prohibition and alternative writ of mandamus and on final determination quashed the writs. We consider the case as an original proceeding. I