Cases

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 09/22/2017 09:14 AM CDT - 96 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 297 Nebraska R eports STATE v. GACH Cite as 297 Neb. 96 State of Nebraska,

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PETER C. GNEHM and ROSA L. GNEHM, Appellants, v. STATE FARM BANK, Appellee. No. 4D14-2433 [September 2, 2015] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Ho

796 N.E.2d 236 (2003) Peter DVORAK, Imram Aziz, Brian Gach, Eric Himes, Scott Albright, and Alan Lutz, Appellants (Defendants below), v. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 53S01-0209-CV-472. Supreme Court of Indiana. September 23, 2003. Michael L. Carmin, Andrews Harrell Mann Carmin & Parker, Julia Blackwell Gelinas, Nelson D. Alexander, Locke

768 N.E.2d 490 (2002) Peter DVORAK, Imram Aziz, Brian Gach, Eric Himes, Scott Albright, and Alan Lutz, Appellants-Defendants, v. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 53A01-0105-CV-188. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 17, 2002. *491 Michael L. Carmin, Andrews, Harrell, Mann, Carmin & Parker, P.C., Bloomington, IN, Jul

MEMORANDUM * Larry Powers (“Powers”) and Lynn Lin-coin Sarko, the Administrator of the Exxon Qualified Settlement Fund (“EQSF”), bring cross-appeals of the district court’s valuation of Powers’ claim under the EQSF Tender Plan. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm, Powers first argues that the district court erred by failing to value his claims for the 1991, 1992 and 1993 fish

198 B.R. 662 (1996) Peter D. GACHE, Plaintiff, v. Barbara BALABER-STRAUSS, as Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Peter D. Gache, Defendant. No. 96 Civ. 1613 (BDP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 24, 1996. *663 Peter D. Gache, Sag Harbor, NY, Pro Se. Barbara Balaber-Strauss, Trustee, White Plains, NY.

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring null and void a certain stipulation of settlement entered into by, among others, the defendant Harrison Town Board, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered May 13, 1997, which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and imposed sanctions upon the appellant, and (2) a purported order of the same co

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge. At issue in this ruling are the fate of two patent infringement actions that this Court has previously found to be related. Plaintiff Fellowes, Inc. (hereinafter, “Fellowes”) seeks to consolidate these cases. Defendants in the later-filed case, Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. and Royal Appliance Manufacturing Co., doing business

702 N.E.2d 1121 (1998) Peter DVORAK, Imram Aziz, Brian Gach, Eric Himes, Scott Albright, and Alan Lutz, Appellants-Defendants, v. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 53A05-9712-CV-503. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 15, 1998. *1122 Michael L. Carmin, Andrews, Harrell, Mann, Chapman & Coyne, P.C., Bloomington,

—Mercure, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered August 17, 1999 in Ulster County, which imposed sanctions against defendant’s counsel. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover the $4,245 balance due on defendant’s credit card account with plaintiff, plus accrued interest. The complaint alleges causes of action for breach of the credit agreement and an account stated. An answer con

813 F.Supp. 1037 (1993) Peter D. GACHE, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF HARRISON, NEW YORK and The Village of Harrison, New York, Defendants. No. 90 Civ. 5908 (GLG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 9, 1993. *1038 *1039 Sidley & Austin, New York City, for plaintiff by Donald Ste

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendants have a duty to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in three underlying actions pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entitled Daniel M. Bianca et al. v Town of Harrison et al.; Guiseppe Casabianca et al. v Town of Harrison et al.; and Andrew Brilliant et al. v Town of Harrison et al., and another underlying action pending in the United States Distri

Filed 12/21/22; Modified and Certified for Pub. 1/20/23 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. B302426, B303196 MARY LYNN RAPIER et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. BC641254) v. ENCINO HOSPI

232 F.Supp.2d 227 (2002) L.B., Plaintiff, v. THE TOWN OF CHESTER, Town of Chester Police Chief Brian Jarvis, Magistrate Peter Masella, Police Officer J. Brendan Medican, the City of New York, New York City Department of Homeless Services, Commissioner Martin Oesterreich, and Department of Homeless Services Police Officers Conde and Brock, Defendants. No. 01 Civ. 3204(RWS). United States District Court,

308 F.Supp.2d 1137 (2004) People of the State of CALIFORNIA, City of Lodi, Plaintiffs, v. M & P INVESTMENTS, et al., Defendants. No. CIV S-00-2441 FCD JFM. United States District Court, E.D. California. November 20, 2003. *1138 Randall A. Hays, City Attorney, City of Lodi, California, Michael C. Donovan, Cecelia C. Fusich, En

333 B.R. 649 (2005) In re ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP., et al., Debtors. No. M47 (SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 29, 2005. *652 J. Christopher Shore, Gerard Uzzi, Douglas P. Baumstein, White & Case LLP, New York City, for the Ad Hoc Committee of Arahova Noteholders. Brian E. O'Connor, Terence K.

MEMORANDUM REGARDING REMAINING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS DONALD MacDONALD IV, Bankruptcy Judge. Chugach Alaska Corporation (“Chu-gach”) has filed an objection to the claims filed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in this case, and has moved for a determination of its tax liability. The parties have previously resolved, by stipulation, a significant portion of the tax dispute. By order dated M

989 F.Supp. 120 (1997) SEALY CONNECTICUT, INC., Plaintiff, v. LITTON INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 3:94CV711(JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 27, 1997. *121 Peter M. Martin, Hebb & Gitlin, A Professional Corp., Hartford, CT, Franca L. Derosa, Brown, Rudnick, Freed & Gesmer, Hartford, C

702 F.Supp. 1338 (1988) Scott Andrew WITZKE, Petitioner, v. Pamela K. WITHROW, Respondent. Scott Andrew WITZKE, Plaintiff, v. William J. HUDSON, et al., Defendants. Nos. G88-325 CA1, G87-944 CA1. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D. November 9, 1988. *1339 Thomas Woods, Lansing, Mich., for petitioner.

833 F.Supp. 646 (1993) CITY OF TOLEDO, Plaintiff, v. BEAZER MATERIALS AND SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendant. No. 3:90 CV 7344. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, W.D. May 25, 1993. *647 *648 *649 John D. Scouten, Toledo, OH, D. David Altman, Stephen P