Cases

610 F.Supp.2d 1129 (2009) David F. JADWIN, D.O., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF KERN; Peter Bryan (Both individually and in his former capacity as Chief Executive Of Kern Medical Center); Irwin Harris, M.D.; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. No. 1:07-CV-00026-OWW-DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. April 8, 2009. *1

Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On April 22, 2016, plaintiffs, who are Latino1 citizens and registered voters in Kern County, commenced this action against the County of Kern, its Board of Supervisors, and other County officials (collectively, "defendants"), challenging Kern County's 2011 redistricting plan under § 2 of the Voting Rights Act,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1062 Filed June 5, 2024 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ERIC ANELA PERRY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County, Charles D. Fagan, Judge. A defendant appeals his conviction for operating while intoxicated. AFFIRMED.

Matter of Sharice N.G. v Perry B. (2023 NY Slip Op 06331) Matter of Sharice N.G. v Perry B. 2023 NY Slip Op 06331 Decided on December 12, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

[Cite as Kern v. Dutiel, 2013-Ohio-2439.] COURT OF APPEALS PERRY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CHARLES E. KERN, ET AL. JUDGES: Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiffs-Appellees Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. Sheila G.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00862-CV Gerald Allen Perry, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-17-002386, HONORABLE TODD A. BLOMERTH, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Levinson v 77 Perry Realty Corp. (2023 NY Slip Op 00160) Levinson v 77 Perry Realty Corp. 2023 NY Slip Op 00160 Decided on January 12, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju

671 F.2d 1223 COUNTY OF KERN and the City of Bakersfield, Petitioners,v.CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD and United Airlines, Inc., Respondents,The State of California, Intervenor. Nos. 79-7308, 80-7099. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued Feb. 12, 1980.Submitted June 2, 1980.Decided Dec. 8, 1980.As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehea

ORDER VAUGHN R. WALKER, Chief Judge. The defendant-intervenors, who are the official proponents of Proposition 8 (“proponents”) move for a protective order against the requests contained in one of plaintiffs’ first set of document requests. Doc # 187. Proponents object to plaintiffs’ request no 8, which seeks “[a]ll versions of any documents that constitute communications relating to Proposition 8, betwee

381 F.Supp.2d 532 (2005) Alain F. KERN, Harley R. Coberly, Carson Fogg, Perry L. Harris, George J. Hinkle, Ricky L. Morrison, and Frederick L. Smith, Plaintiffs, v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and Verizon West Virginia Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A.1:04 CV 262. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. August 10, 2005. *533

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Humphreys, O’Brien and Malveaux Argued at Richmond, Virginia PERRY EDWARD JONES OPINION BY v. Record No. 2069-16-2 JUDGE MARY GRACE O’BRIEN AUGUST 22, 20

108 Cal.App.3d 480 (1980) 166 Cal. Rptr. 583 ROXANNA MARIE PERRY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KERN COUNTY, Respondent; FREDERICK LEE PERRY, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. 5486. Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District. July 22, 1980. *481 COUNSEL Young, Wooldridge, Paulden & S

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIA SAMPSON, No. 18-55450 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:17-cv-00599- PA-PJW COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, by and through the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family

808 N.E.2d 765 (2004) Jack PERRY, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. William DRIEHORST, M.D., Southside Orthopaedic Surgery, Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A02-0307-CV-633. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 21, 2004. Rehearing Denied July 15, 2004. *766 James E. Ayers, Linden, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steven J. Cohen,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for *948Summary Judgment, filed April 11, 2013 (Doc. 8). The Court held a hearing on July 2, 2013. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Defendants violated Plaintiff Fred Dean Chavez’ constitutional rights by in

SECOND DIVISION FEBRUARY 27, 2001 1-99-3892 MARY E. PERRY, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court Plaintiff-Appellee, ) of Cook County ) ) ) No. 97 MI 719061 LORETTA MINOR, ) ) Defendan

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge The plaintiffs, Maranda Lynn ODonnell, Robert Ryan Ford, and Loetha McGruder, sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging Harris County’s postarrest detention policies. They alleged that the Harris County Sheriff and sixteen Harris .County Criminal Courts at Law Judges promulgate policies that violate the Equal Protection and Due Proces

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment, filed June 7, 2016 (Doc. 34)(“MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on September 21, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendants Rio Arri-ba County, Rio Arriba County Sheriffs Department, and Deputy Gilbert Atencio are ent

124 N.J. 128 (1991) 590 A.2d 624 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR PERRY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued October 9, 1990. Decided May 20, 1991. *133 Katherine F. Graham, Designated Counsel, and Mark H. Friedman, Assistant Deputy Public Defender