Cases

Case: 25-30325 Document: 88-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/25/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 25, 2026

678 F.Supp.2d 348 (2009) Christina D. PERRY-BEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:08cv100. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. January 15, 2009. *351 Christina D. Perry-Bey, pro se. Paul W. Jacobs, II, Melvin W. Ringer, for Defendant. OPINION

ORDER DANIEL P. JORDAN III, District Judge. This § 1983 equal-protection action is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [50]. Plaintiff has responded in opposition [55]. Having fully considered the parties’ submissions and the relevant authority, the Court finds that the motion should be granted. I. Facts and Procedural History This suit springs f

Filed 9/20/23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA PICO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA, Defendant and Appellant. S263972 Second Appellate District, Division Eight B295935 Los Angeles County Superior Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA PICO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA, Defendant and Appellant. S263972 Second Appellate District, Division Eight B295935 Los Angeles County Superior Court BC616804 August 24,

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION SETTING OUT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 673 I. The Law Governing the Court’s Inquiry, Findings, and Conclusions... 674 A. Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the Fifteenth Amendment.. .675 B. The Fou

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THOMAS 0. RICE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are cross-motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 64 & 67), and motions by the Plaintiffs to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Stephan Thernstrom (ECF No. 62) and to strike the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Peter Morrison (ECF Nos. 88 & 89). These matters were heard with telephonic oral ar

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge. In the 2000 Census, 32.6% of the population in the City of Aurora, Illinois, identified itself as Hispanic, but of the City’s residents who are citizens and old enough to vote only 16.3% are Hispanic. Aurora has 10 single-seat wards, only one of which reliably elects Latino candidates to the City Council. Another ward, although about 66% Latino, has twic

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS <

201 S.W.3d 787 (2006) BOSSIER CHRYSLER DODGE II, INC., d/b/a Bossier Country, Appellant, v. Bryan RAUSCHENBERG, Appellee. No. 10-05-00140-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. June 14, 2006. Rehearing Overruled August 22, 2006. *793 J. Bruce Bennett, Cardwell Hart & Bennett LLP, William R. Crocker, Austin, for

Judgment rendered August 9, 2023. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,209-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: The Americans with Disabilities Act, § 503, 42 U.S.C. § 12203 (1995) (“ADA” or “the Act”), prohibits retaliation against an individual who has “opposed any act or practice made unlawful by” the Act’s anti-discrimination provisions. Part A of Sub-chapter II of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131— 12134, generally makes disability discrimination in the provision of pu

632 F.Supp.2d 740 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. EUCLID CITY SCHOOL BOARD, et al., Defendants. Case No. 08-CV-2832. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 13, 2009. *743 Sonya L. Sacks, Steven H. Wright, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. David Kane Smit

Judgment rendered September 25, 2019. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 52,720-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** BENJAMIN PERRY

WILLIAMS, J. hThe plaintiffs, Kenneth Webb, Rosey Farris, Gerald Dowden and Vellen Dow-den, appeal a judgment denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Exco Operating. Co., ■ LP, BG U.S. Production Company, LLC, Long Petroleum, LLC, True Oil, LLC, Burk Royalty Co., Ltd., Bienville Investments, Kim-bell Family Resources, Ltd., H

SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is a suit by Anglo voters of Dallas County, Texas who maintain that their rights under § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 ("VRA"), 52 U.S.C. § 10301 et seq. , and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment have been violated by the abse

Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On April 22, 2016, plaintiffs, who are Latino1 citizens and registered voters in Kern County, commenced this action against the County of Kern, its Board of Supervisors, and other County officials (collectively, "defendants"), challenging Kern County's 2011 redistricting plan under § 2 of the Voting Rights Act,

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge: Table of Contents I. Background.............................................................138 II. Principles of Section 5 Analysis...........................................139 A.Retrogression.......................................................139 1. Texas’s Burden of Proof.......

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1845 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA; A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE; UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE; COMMON CAUSE NORTH CAROLINA; GOLDIE WELLS; KAY BRANDON; OCTAVIA RAINEY; SARA STOHLER; HUGH STOHLER, Plaintiffs, and LOUIS M. DUKE; CHARLES M. GRAY; ASGOD BARRANTES; JOSUE E. BERDUO; BRIA

Case 1:11-cv-01428-CKK-MG-ESH Document 149 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 119 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1428