Cases

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, November 17, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16A0275. THE STATE v. PERRY WILLOUGHBY. Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

MEMORANDUM * Montana land developers appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Ravalli County. The facts are known to the parties and need not be repeated here, except as necessary to explain our decision. *583Ravalli County did not violate the developers’ procedural rights under the Due Process Clause of the F

MEMORANDUM * Montana land developers appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Ravalli County. The facts are known to the parties and need not be repeated here, except as necessary to explain our decision. *583Ravalli County did not violate the developers’ procedural rights under the Due Process Clause of the F

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 28th day of December 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."

626 N.E.2d 601 (1993) Bernard WILLOUGHBY, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49A05-9308-CR-275. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fifth District. December 30, 1993. Robert C. Perry, Steckler Perry & Ryan, Indianapolis, for appellant-defendant. Pamela Carter, Atty. Gen., Deana McIntire Smith, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of Atty. Gen

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D23-1070 LT Case No. 2017-CF-2319 _____________________________ CHARLES J. WILLOUGHBY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ 3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Lisa D. Herndon, Judge. Charles J. Willoughby, Perry, pro se

The appellant, Leon Perry, was indicted for the intentional murder of Harold Watkins, Jr. A jury convicted him of the charged offense and he was sentenced as a habitual felony offender to 30 years' imprisonment. Three issues are raised in this direct appeal from that conviction. I The appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because, he says, the State failed to prove that he had the requisite intent to kill Watkins.

OPINION PER CURIAM: Appellees Farmers for Fairness, Inc. and William Bryant Perry (collectively “Farmers”), filed suit in federal court challenging certain provisions of the North Carolina election and campaign finance law and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Although determining that the question of the constitutionality of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 163-278.12A was moot following this court’s decision

[Cite as State v. Perry, 2021-Ohio-2183.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2021-L-005 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the -v- Court of Common Pleas CLARENCE A. PERRY,

NUMBERS 13-12-00284-CR 13-12-00285-CR 13-12-00286-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG DON WILLOUGHBY STEPHENS III, Appellant, v. THE

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Quentin Lamont Lavell Perry appeals his conviction and 15-year sentence for possessing a gun and ammunition as a felon. See 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). He argues that the police did not have probable cause to arrest him, th

[Cite as State v. Perry, 2012-Ohio-4273.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97572 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

[Cite as Perry v. Carter, 2011-Ohio-4214.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT : JUDGES: CYNTHIA PERRY, et al., : William B. Hoffman, P.J. : Sheila G. Farmer, J. Plaintiffs-Appellants : Julie A. Edwards,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 30, 2015 JOSEPH J. HOLT v. TRUSTEE OF THE WILLOUGHBY CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CEMETARY, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Greene County No. 20130107 Douglas T. Jenkins, Chancellor No. E2014-01502-COA-R3-CV – June 22, 2015 Hal H. Lane appeals the May 20, 2014 Declarator

Filed: November 20, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Nos. 99-1955(L) (CA-98-43-2-BR) William Bryant Perry, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus Gary O. Bartlett, etc., et al., Defendants -

J. MICHELLE CHILDS, United States District Judge This matter is before the court pursuant to Plaintiff State of South Carolina's ("the *218State") Motion for Preliminary Injunction to prevent the Department of Energy ("DOE") and the National Nuclear Security Administration ("NNSA") and their officials (collectively, "the Federal Defendants") fr

Mr. Justice TomliNsoN delivered the opinion of the Court. Willoughby’s injury admittedly falls within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. It resulted in a 67%% permanent partial disability of his leg, whereby he is entitled to be compensated for 67%% of 175 weeks, to wit, 118.125 weeks. His wages were such as to entitle him to the maximum benefits of $28 per week. In addition to the temporary to

RYMER, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to the so-called “don’t ask/don’t tell” policy regarding gays in the military,1 the Navy discharged Petty Officer Mark A. Philips for stating that he is a homosexual, and for engaging in and saying that he will continue to engage in homosexual acts. Concluding that this circuit has held in a line of cases from Beller v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788 (9th Cir.1

WYNN, Circuit Judge: The State of South Carolina brought this action to enjoin the United States of America and other Defendants 1 (collectively, "the United States") from terminating the construction of a mixed-oxide fuel nuclear processing facility located at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina. South

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellants, Paul Hofer, et al., appeal from the judgment entry of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas dismissing their administrative appeal for lack of standing. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. {¶ 2} This case originated when appellees, Ronald and Mary Kaleal, filed a request with the Village of North Perry zoning inspector for a permit to build a resident