⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

16 opinions for “Perkins v. Tesla, Inc.”

Apple Inc. v. Vidalpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023-03-13 · Published · cited 20× · 63 F.4th 1
Case: 22-1249 Document: 71 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., GOOGLE LLC, INTEL CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE
Apple Inc. v. Vidalpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 22-1249 Document: 71 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., GOOGLE LLC, INTEL CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2025-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
Corrected In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-1227C (Filed Under Seal: March 10, 2025) (Reissued: April 30, 2025)* FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** 22ND CENTURY * TECHNOLOGIES, INC., * * Plaintiff,
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2021-06-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TILRAY, INC. Consolidated REORGANIZATION LITIGATION C.A. No. 2020-0137-KSJM MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: February 5, 2021 Date Decided: June 1, 2021 Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer, Jessica Zeldin, David M. Sborz, ANDREWS & SPRINGER LLC, Wilmington, DE; Gregory V. Varallo, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ B
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2024-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Athey, Causey and Callins Argued at Winchester, Virginia PUBLISHED ARTURO BARNES OPINION BY v. Record No. 0991-23-2 JUDGE DOMINIQUE A. CALLINS APRIL 23, 2
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019-01-07 · Published · cited 129× · 912 F.3d 1039
Brennan, Circuit Judge. Hype and reality can be at odds. This contrast arises often in postmortems on once-fashionable, now-failed investment securities. Hype can raise investors' hopes and, in turn, capital contributions. But when hype accelerates an investment's market value beyond its actual worth, a financial bubble is formed. Fisker Automotive, Inc. was such
District Court, N.D. California · 2019-03-20 · Published · cited 26× · 374 F. Supp. 3d 923
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 300 LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge *933Plaintiffs Gregor Lesnik and Stjepan Papes (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have brought suit stemming from their time working at a facility owned by Tesla, Inc. ("Tesla") in Fremont, California, agai
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019-01-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1815 ORGONE CAPITAL III, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KEITH DAUBENSPECK, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Cou
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025-01-29 · Published · cited 0×
EFiled: Jan 29 2025 10:30AM EST Transaction ID 75534673 Case No. 2024-0457-SEM IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND OFFICE OF ) THE GENERAL TREASURER, ON BEHALF ) OF THE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT ) SYSTEM OF RHODE ISLAND, )
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-02-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WEST PALM BEACH FIREFIGHTERS’ ) PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and ) all other similarly-situated Class A ) stockholders of MOELIS & COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0309-JTL ) MOELI
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2021-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN H. KIHM, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0938-MTZ ) DAVID M. MOTT, LEON O. ) MOULDER, DR. MARY LYNNE ) HEDLEY, TIMOTHY R. PEARSON, ) KAV
Lobato v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013-05-28 · Published · cited 5× · 304 P.3d 1132; 2013 CO 30; 2013 Colo. LEXIS 383; 2013 WL 2349302
Chief Justice BENDER, dissenting. 149 Today, the majority abdicates this court's responsibility to give meaningful ef-feet to the Education Clause's guarantee that all Colorado students receive a thorough and uniform education. In my view, a thorough and uniform system of education must include the availability of qualified teachers, up-to-date textbooks, access to modern technology, and safe and healthy faci
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936-01-27 · Published · cited 1× · 13 F. Supp. 562; 1936 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1495
BREWSTER, District Judge. The above entitled infringement suits were tried together under a stipulation that the evidence, so far as relevant, should be received upon all cases. Three letters patent of the United States are involved, namely, No. 1,283,434 (referred to hereafter as the Warren clock patent) ; No. 1,334,-423 (referred to hereafter as the Warren indicator patent); and No. 1,892,552 (referred to hereafter as the
Ex Parte Petersonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1920-06-01 · Published · cited 577× · 253 U.S. 300; 40 S. Ct. 543; 64 L. Ed. 919; 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1424
253 U.S. 300 (1920) EX PARTE PETERSON, AS RECEIVER OF THE INTERSTATE COAL COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER. No. 28, Original. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 15, 1920. Decided June 1, 1920. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. *301 Mr. Abram J. Rose, with whom Mr. Anthony L. Willia