Cases

279 F.Supp.2d 1118 (2003) BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF DALY CITY, CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. Nos. C 02-4343 CW, C 02-4943 CW. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 29, 2003. *1119 E. Edward Bruce, Keith A. Noreika, Richard C. Darwin, Stuart C. Stock, Vince Chhabria, Covington & Burl

ORDER D.P. MARSHALL JR., District Judge. Emmanuel Ilodianya is suing Capital One Bank for alleged Fair Credit Reporting Act violations, defamation of credit, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Ilodianya asks, among other things, for declaratory relief against Capital One — he wants the company to correct any remaining false information on his credit report. Capital One moves to dismiss. The

Fabricant, Judith, J. INTRODUCTION This action presents a dispute between the Attorney General of Massachusetts and certain banks and related entities regarding practices in connection with foreclosure of home mortgages. The Attorney General contends that certain alleged practices of the defendants are unfair and deceptive, in violation of G.L.c. 93A, §2. At an earlier stage of this litigation, the parties stip

539 F.3d 862 (2008) JCB, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNION PLANTERS BANK, NA, Defendant-Appellant, Machinery, Inc., Defendant. No. 07-2968. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 14, 2008. Filed: August 26, 2008. *867 Jeffrey Heuer, argued, St. Louis, MO, Michael A. Clithero and Geo

CRAIN, J. (2In this suit to collect a balance owed on a credit card, the trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Unifund CCR Partners. We reverse and remand. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Unifund sued Felicia Dianne Perkins alleging that Perkins “entered into an agreement with [Unifund] ... or its assignor ... to obtain goods or services on open

803 S.W.2d 774 (1991) Joe M. JERNIGAN, Appellant, v. BANK ONE, TEXAS, N.A., Appellee. No. B14-90-347-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist). January 10, 1991. *775 Stephen E. Toomey, Daphne Levey, Houston, for appellant. Joyce M. Palmer, Joe Klaus, Houston, for appellee. Before ROBERTSON, SEARS and DRAUG

ORDER ON SECOND MOTION OF DEFENDANT OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Paul W. Bonapfel, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Kirk Wright allegedly operated International Management Associates, LLC (“IMA”) and affiliated entities as a Ponzi scheme. Mr. Wright opened a brokerage account with the defendant Oppenheimer & Co. (“Oppenheimer”) in the name of IMA and transferred funds of IMA to the acco

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND GRANTING TURNOVER MOTIONS ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: Plaintiffs are judgment creditors against the Republic of Cuba (“Cuba”). They were granted judgments by the Circuit Court of Florida, and domesticated their judgments in the United States District Courts for the Southern District of Florida and the Southern District of New York, th

ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are the Receiver’s Renewed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 228), the opposition of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“the Bank”) (Dkt. 255), the Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. 231), and the Receiver’s opposition (Dkt. 251). As requested, supplemental briefs were filed by the Bank (Dkt.

ORDER LAWRENCE 0. ANDERSON, United States Magistrate Judge. This action comes before the Court on Defendants’ second Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed.R.Civ.P.”), Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint.1 (Doc. 51) Defendants contend Plaintiffs Amended Verified Complaint (“AVC”), doc. 53, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-2968 ___________ JCB, Inc., * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * v. * * Appeal from

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. Petitioner Jeannette Hausler (“Hausler” or “Petitioner”) brings this action as the successor and personal representative of the Estate of Robert Otis Fuller (“Fuller”) pursuant to § 201(a) of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (the “TRIA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1610 note, to execute a default judgment entered by a Florida state court (the “Florida

431 F.Supp.2d 183 (2006) NEW HAVEN SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. Althea FOLLINS, Harold Follins, Aetna Finance Company d/b/a ITT Financial Services, Second Federal Funding, United States of America, Bay State Gas, Defendants. No. CIV.A.2003-12634-RBC.[1] United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. May 24, 2006. *184

JONES, District Judge. After a three week trial in which 104 witnesses testified and approximately 200 exhibits were introduced, defendants Craig Scott Keltner and Charles Bruce Nabors were convicted by a jury of a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c). The jury found the defendants committed the following racketeering acts

USCA11 Case: 21-14269 Date Filed: 08/26/2022 Page: 1 of 66 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14269 ____________________ STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.,

WINTER, Chief Judge: Affiliated FM Insurance Co. (“Affiliated”) appeals from a judgment, entered after a bench trial before Judge Pollack, awarding Chemical Bank and five other banks (collectively, the “Banks”)1 approximately $47 million in damages and $45 million in prejudgment interest. The award was made under a maritime open cargo insurance policy issued by Affiliated to Andina Coffee, Inc. (

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #077 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinion handed down on the 19th day of December, 2016, is as follows: BY HUGHES, J.: 2012-KA-0508 STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JEFFREY CLARK (Parish of West Feliciana) For the reasons assigned herein, the defendant’s conviction and death sentence are affirmed. In the

OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore

Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: We granted, in a prior order, rehearing en bane in this appeal. In a separate order, filed concurrently with this opinion, -we scheduled en banc oral argument for the week o