Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERKINS COIE LLP, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-716 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERKINS COIE LLP, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-716 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING ) HALE AND DORR LLP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. 25-917 (RJL) V. ) ) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE ) PRESIDENT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________ _)

MEMORANDUM * In this matter, the district court assessed a sanction of $1,000 because Respondents filed a brief that exceeded the page limits set forth in Local Rule 7(e)(4). Respondents contend that the district court abused its discretion and violated due process in imposing a monetary sanction without providing them with notice and an opportunity to be heard with regard to the appropriateness of the sanct

MEMORANDUM ** Marat Nasybulin, a native and citizen of Uzbekistan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002), we deny the petition for review. Contrary to Nasybuliris conte

MEMORANDUM ** Fredy Nohe Morales, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review legal determinations de novo and factual findings for substantial evidence. Thomas v. Gonzales,

MEMORANDUM*** Semere Ab-Gebru, a.k.a. Semere-ab Gebru (“Gebru”), a native and citizen of *883Ethiopia of Eritrean descent, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252

MEMORANDUM * Charles Nnaemeka Assimonye, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of a final order of deportation issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on November 22, 2000. The BIA’s order affirmed the order of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Assimonye’s application for asylum and withholding of removal. We presume that the parties are familiar with the facts of the case and

ORDER This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 486 F.3d 638 (9th Cir.2007), reversed and remanded by — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2458, 174 L.Ed.2d 193 (2009). We, in turn, remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

ORDER The memorandum filed August 14, 2008, is withdrawn and replaced by the authored opinion by Judge Reavley, filed concurrently with this order. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

705 F.Supp.2d 519 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel., Michael J. Dekort, and Michael J. Dekort, individually, Plaintiffs, v. INTEGRATED COAST GUARD SYSTEMS, A Joint Venture, Lockheed Martin Corporation, A Joint Venture Partner, and Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc., A Joint Venture Partner, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-1792-O. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.</

KESSLER, J. *455¶ 1 Richard Zecchino and Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership (collectively, "Adams"), appeal an order of the circuit court dismissing its action against the Dane County Board of Supervisors and certain members of the Board regarding the renewal of a billboard lease. Adams's action alleged violations of the open meeting

In the United States Court of Federal Claims BID PROTEST ) EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) No. 22-1571C THE UNITED STATES OF

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Thaddeus J. North and Mark P. Pompeo were registered securities brokers who were charged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) with improprieties and ultimately subjected to fines and suspensions. Both men vehemently insist that FINRA relied on false data, made available to it by Smarsh, Inc., its alleged co-conspirator.

580 F.3d 873 (2009) SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL; Sierra Club; Lynn Canal Conservation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; Timothy J. Gallagher Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer; Larry L. Reeder, in his official capacity of Chief of the Regulatory Branch; Dominic Izzo, in his official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works); United States Forest Service

ORDER Per Curiam Upon consideration of the petitions of Louisiana Environmental Action Network, Sierra Club, Clean Air Council, Partnership for Policy Integrity, and Environmental Integrity Project for rehearing en banc filed in Nos. 11-1108, et al. and 11-1141, et al., the petition of American Municipal Power, Inc. for rehearing en banc filed in No. 11-1108, et al., and the absence of a request by any member o

JUDGMENT These causes came to be heard on the petition of the Environmental Protection Agency for panel rehearing as to remedy, and the responses thereto. On consideration thereof, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of this court filed July 29, 2016 remain in effect as to No. 11-1125, et al., American Forest & Paper Association, Inc., et al. v. EPA, and the above-captioned cases, in accordance with th

ORDER Per Curiam Upon consideration of the petitions for panel rehearing filed on September 12, 2016 by Louisiana Environmental Action Network, Sierra Club, Clean Air Council, Partnership for Policy Integrity, and Environmental Integrity Project in Nos. 11-1108, et al. and 11-1141, et ah; by American Municipal Power, Inc. in No. 11-1108, et al.; and by EPA in No. 11-1108, et al. as to remedy, and the respons

BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Motion (# 17) to Remand by Plaintiff Relator Northwest Public Communications Council (NPCC), Defendant Qwest Corporation’s Motion (# 14) to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, and Qwest’s Motion (#22) to Strike NPCC’s Response (#20) to Qwest’s Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES NPCC’s Motion (# 17) to Remand, GRANTS Qwest’s Motio

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge Plaintiff Griselle Marino (“Plaintiff’ or “Marino”) brings this action against the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA” or “the Government”) under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. Marino seeks documents related to a Government cooperator w