⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Pereyra v. Pereyra”

People v. Pereyrapublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-02-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 907
People v Pereyra (2019 NY Slip Op 00907) People v Pereyra 2019 NY Slip Op 00907 Decided on February 6, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600395 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ROBERTO PEREYRA, JR. Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellan
Pereyra v. Sedkypublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015-12-03 · Published · cited 0× · 148 F. Supp. 3d 134; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162219; 2015 WL 7854061
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS ALLISON D. BURROUGHS, DISTRICT JUDGE BURROUGHS, DISTRICT JUDGE. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Roberto Pereyra (“Pereyra”) and City Fitness Group, LLC filed this action against Defendants Herve Sedky (“Sedky”), and five limited liability corporations that Sedky allegedly controls: KLIO Fitness Clubs, LLC; KLIO
People v. Pereyrapublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 63 A.D.3d 545; 882 N.Y.S.2d 30
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered July 1, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of four years, unanimously affirmed. The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013-12-04 · Published · cited 0× · 547 F. App'x 853
MEMORANDUM ** Ricardo Pereyra-Equihua appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 132-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Pereyra-Equihua’s counsel has filed a brief stat
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 851 A.2d 853
ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2004, the order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas is reversed insofar as it declared the Registration of Sexual Offenders Act unconstitutional, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. See Commonwealth v. Williams, 574 Pa. 487, 832 A.2d 962 (2003); Commonwealth v. Maldonado, 576 Pa. 101, 838 A.2d 710 (2003)
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009-04-16 · Published · cited 13× · 563 F.3d 322; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 7881; 2009 WL 1011505
563 F.3d 322 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Braulio PEREYRA-GABINO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-2869. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 12, 2009. Filed: April 16, 2009. *323 J. Keith Rigg, argued, Des Moines, IA, for appellant. Andrew H. Kahl, AUSA, a
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 578 Pa. 233; 851 A.2d 853; 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1335
*234 ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 2004, the order of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas is reversed insofar as it declared the Registration of Sexual Offenders Act unconstitutional, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. See Commonwealth v. Williams, 574 Pa. 487, 832 A.2d 962 (2003); Comm
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2025-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 28, 2025 NO. 03-23-00234-CV Siller Preferred Services, LLC, Appellant v. Ana Piedra Bravo, Kevin Pereyra, and Bravo-Drewy Enterprises, LLC, Appellees APPEAL FROM THE 455TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2869 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 255 F. App'x 199
MEMORANDUM ** Mario Jesus Escalante-Pereyra appeals from his jury-trial conviction and sentence of time served for unlawful reentry by a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Escalante-Pereyra’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion t
State v. Pereyrapublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001-02-06 · Published · cited 8× · 18 P.3d 146; 199 Ariz. 352; 340 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 5; 2001 Ariz. App. LEXIS 11
18 P.3d 146 (2001) 199 Ariz. 352 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. George Teodoro PEREYRA, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 99-0809. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. February 6, 2001. *147 Janet Napolitano, Attorney General, by Randall M. Howe, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section and Galen H.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2025-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00234-CV Siller Preferred Services, LLC, Appellant v. Ana Piedra Bravo, Kevin Pereyra, and Bravo-Drewy Enterprises, LLC, Appellees FROM THE 455TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-21-002061, THE HONORABLE MAYA GUERRA GAMBLE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM O
Pereyra v. Ashcroftpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-09-17 · Published · cited 0× · 48 F. App'x 231
MEMORANDUM ** Magdalena Escobar Pereyra appeals pro se1 from the district court’s judgment denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging the Immigration Judge’s order finding her removable because of her conviction of a controlled substance offense and an aggravated felony. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Flores-Miramontes v. INS, 212 F.3d
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001-07-23 · Published · cited 0× · 15 F. App'x 482
MEMORANDUM ** Aurelio Morales-Pereyra appeals the judgment of conviction and 57-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Morales-Pereyra contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court improperly imposed a senten
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-01-11 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 1086; 119 S. Ct. 835
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-01-11 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 1086
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Pereyra v. Inspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990-12-05 · Published · cited 0× · 923 F.2d 845; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22805; 1990 WL 252551
923 F.2d 845 Pereyrav.INS NO. 90-4095 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. DEC 05, 1990 1 Appeal From: I.N.S. 2 DENIED.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980-03-03 · Published · cited 0× · 622 F.2d 577; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19985
622 F.2d 577 U. S.v.Pereyra 79-1319 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 3/3/80 1 E.D.N.Y. DISMISSED
PEREYRApublic domain
Board of Immigration Appeals · 1978-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 16 I. & N. Dec. 590
Interim Decision #2667 MATTER OF PEREYRA In Deportation Proceedings A-21026629 Decided by Board August 10, 1978 An exchange visitor who is no longer subject to the foreign residence requirement in view of the amendment of section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act is not precluded from establishing statutory eligibility for suspension of deportation not- withstan