Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “Perdue v. Walgreen Co.”
Rutledge v. Walgreen Co.; Phippen v. Walgreen Co.public domain
24-916(L); 24-2594 Rutledge v. Walgreen Co.; Phippen v. Walgreen Co. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term 2025 5 Argued: November 17, 2025 Decided: July 13, 2026 6 Docket Nos. 24-916-cv(L), 24-1121(Con), 24-2360(Con); 24-2594-cv 7 8 9 TIFFANY RUTLEDGE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
Rutledge v. Walgreen Co.; Phippen v. Walgreen Co.public domain
24-916(L); 24-2594 Rutledge v. Walgreen Co.; Phippen v. Walgreen Co. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2025 Argued: November 17, 2025 Decided: July 13, 2026 Docket Nos. 24-916-cv(L), 24-1121(Con), 24-2360(Con); 24-2594-cv TIFFANY RUTLEDGE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS MOTHER, GENERAL GUARDIAN OF, ET AL., KRI
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Robert P. Young, Jr. Michael F. Cavanagh
Stemm v. Tootsie Roll Indus., Inc.public domain
John Z. Lee, United States District Judge Plaintiff Paige Stemm filed this suit on behalf of herself and a putative class, alleging that Defendant Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. ("Tootsie Roll") packaged and sold its Junior Mints candy product in opaque boxes that hid the large amount of empty space contained in them. Stemm believes that this practice violates the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (the "ICF
Triumph Foods, LLC v. Campbellpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1759 TRIUMPH FOODS, LLC, CHRISTENSEN FARMS MIDWEST, LLC, THE HANOR COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, LLC, NEW FASHION PORK, LLP, EICHELBERGER FARMS, INC. and ALLIED PRODUCERS' COOPERATIVE, individually and on behalf of its members, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. ANDREA JOY CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Mas
State v. Duhepublic domain
PER CURIAM. |)We granted the state’s application to consider the First Circuit’s split-panel decision reversing defendant’s conviction and habitual offender sentence for the creation or operation of a clandestine methamphetamine laboratory in violation of La.R.S. 40:983. State v. Duke, 12-0172 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/8/12), 2012 WL 5462757 (McClen-don, J., dissenting without written reasons) (unpub’d). For the reasons that
Gilmore v. Audubon Nature Inst., Inc.public domain
JOSEPH C. WILKINSON, JR., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *504This is an Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") action by plaintiff, Wayne Gilmore ("plaintiff"), against defendant, the Audubon Nature Institute, Inc. ("Audubon"). Plaintiff asserted claims against Audubon for its failure to comply with the building requirements of Title III of th
Hashw v. Department Stores National Bankpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This action arises out of automated debt-collection telephone calls made by Defendants Department Stores National Bank (“DSNB”) and FDS Bank (“FDS”) in connection with Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s credit-card accounts. Plaintiff Ameer Hashw, acting on behalf of himself and a nationwide class of persons w
Wills & Wills, L.P. v. Gillpublic domain
54 S.W.3d 283 (2001) WILLS & WILLS, L.P. v. Raymond B. GILL, III. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Memphis. January 4, 2001. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied June 18, 2001. *284 Richard M. Carter and Curt R. Soefker, Memphis, TN, for appellants, Wills & Wills, L.P. James W. Surprise, Memphis, TN, for ap
Kearney v. Auto-Owners Insurancepublic domain
713 F.Supp.2d 1369 (2010) Clayton KEARNEY, Plaintiff, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No.: 8:06-cv-00595-T-24-TGW. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. May 14, 2010. *1371 Bennie Lazzara, Jr., James Robert Freeman, Wilkes & McHugh, PA, Dale M. Swope, Lisha D. Bowen, Shea T. Moxon, Swop
Wills & Wills v. Raymond Gillpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS October 10, 2000 Session WILLS & WILLS, L.P. v. RAYMOND B. GILL, III Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. 99-0645-1 Walter L. Evans, Chancellor No. W1999-01755-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 4, 2001 Owners of adjacent properties entered into negotiations and a sub
Labzda v. Purdue Pharma L.P.public domain
292 F.Supp.2d 1346 (2003) William LABZDA and Carol Jo Labzda, individually, as Parents and Personal Representatives of the Estate of Michael Labzda, and in the Name of the State of Florida, Plaintiffs, v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., the Purdue Frederick Company, et al. Defendants. No. 018726CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. September 23, 2003.
VODAK v. City of Chicagopublic domain
624 F.Supp.2d 933 (2009) Kevin VODAK et al, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Former Superintendent Terry G. Hillard; Chief Philip Cline; Chief Jerry Robinson, Deputy Chief Tom Byrne, Deputy Chief Ralph Chiczewski, Commander John Killacky, Commander Sam Christian, Commander David Doherty, Commander Marianne Perry, Commander John R. Risley, Commander Joseph Griffin, Commander Daniel Dugan, Comm
RESOLUCIÓN A la solicitud de certiorari del Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico, “no ha lugar”. La Ley Núm. 121 de 13 de octubre de 2009 (4 L.P.R.A. secs. 772 n., 773-775, 780-781, 783, 2011 y 2021) y la Ley Núm. 135 de 6 de noviembre de 2009 (4 L.P.R.A. secs. 772 n., 773-774 y 777 — 778) son un ejercicio válido de la facul-tad constitucional de la Asamblea Legislativa. Tal y como razonó el Tribunal d
Broesche v. Bullockpublic domain
427 S.W.2d 89 (1968) Charles R. BROESCHE et al., Appellants, v. Maxine BULLOCK et vir, Appellees. No. 90. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). March 27, 1968. Rehearing Denied April 24, 1968. *91 Preston Shirley, Mills, Shirley, McMicken & Eckel, Galveston, for appellants. Ralph K. Mi
ACCEPTED 03-14-00717-CV 3677007 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2015 10:35:57 AM
OKLAHOMA CHAP. OF AMER. ACA., PEDIAT. v. Fogartypublic domain
366 F.Supp.2d 1050 (2005) OKLAHOMA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS (OKAAP), et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael FOGARTY, Chief Executive Officer of the Oklahoma Health Care Authority (OHCA), et al., Defendants. No. 01CV0187-CVE-SAJ. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. March 22, 2005. *1051
In re Conagra Foods Inc.public domain
*1095ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. In November and December 2011, the court consolidated several cases filed against defendant ConAgra Foods, Inc. under the above caption.1 Prior to the consolidation, the court dismissed the complaint in one
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW EAGAN, Chief Judge. Introduction Plaintiff Oklahoma Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (“OKAAP”) is a non-profit professional organization of pediatricians and pediatric specialists. Plaintiff Community Action Project of Tulsa County, Inc. (“CAPTC”) is a non-profit organization located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The individual nam