Cases

692 F.Supp.2d 712 (2010) Leon PERCIVAL, Plaintiff, v. Sandra GIRARD, and Prison Legal Services of Michigan, Defendants. Case No. 08-CV-12374. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 26, 2010. *714 Leon Percival, Marquette, MI, pro se. Sandra L. Girard, Jackson, MI, for Defendants. OP

139 B.R. 629 (1992) In re BAILEY PONTIAC, INC., Debtor. DINKEL ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Billings Auto Auction, Appellant, v. Joseph COLVIN, Trustee for Bailey Pontiac, Inc., Appellee. Civ. A. No. 4-92-084-A. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. April 21, 1992. *630 *631<

543 F.Supp.2d 842 (2008) Birda TROLLINGER, Virginia Bravo, Kelly Kessinger, Idoynia McCoy, Regina Lee, Patricia Mims, Lori Windham and Alexander Howlett, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TYSON FOODS, INC., John Tyson, Archibald Schaffer III, Richard, Bond, Kenneth Kimbro, Greg Lee, Karen Percival, Ahrazue Wilt and Tim McCoy, Defendants. No. 4:02-CV-23. United

866 S.W.2d 32 (1993) Roger Wayne WHEELER and Barbara Jo Wheeler, Appellants, v. WHEELER v. YETTIE KERSTING MEMORIAL HOSP. Sergio Rodriguez, M.D., M. Davison, R.N., S. Colvin, R.N., University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston, John Sealy Hospital, Life Support Team, Jerry Russell Davis, and Ernest Koehler, Appellees. No. 01-92-00609-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). <

ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

JOHNSON, J. Action on a contract by the terms of which defendant is alleged to have assumed the payment of a debt owed by another person to plaintiff. The court peremptorily directed a verdict for defendant at the conclusion of the evidence offered by plaintiff, and plaintiff appealed. Henry E. Shackelford and Cordell Colvin were *485partners engaged in

Finch, J.: The facts in the case at bar are as follows: The parties were married in this State in January, 1914. Immediately thereafter they established their matrimonial domicile in the State of New Jersey and thereafter lived in the States of Pennsylvania and New Jersey and for about three weeks in the city of Rochester, N. Y. In the fall of 1916 the plaintiff and the defendant moved to Stroudsburg, Penn., and established a

*431 KING, Circuit Judge: Just as medieval alchemists bent all their energies to discovering a formula that would transmute dross into gold, so too do modem creditors’ lawyers sptend prodigious amounts of time and effort seeking to convert their clients’ general, unsecured claims against a bankrupt debtor

The plaintiff, a minor, while in the employ of the defendant, in its dyeing room, guiding or steering cloth as it wound upon a wooden cylinder attached to a revolving rod or shaft, running through its center, came in contact with the battered and burred end of the shaft, which projected beyond the socket or gudgeon, and caught his clothing and broke his thigh and leg. In this action to recover for said personal injury the complaint alleged negligence and wilfulness in failing to provide safe

Given, J. -1 2 I. Appellants’ first complaint is of the ruling ef the court sustaining appellee’s motion to strike said second amendment to the answer. We think there was no error in the ruling. The averment of want of diligence on the part of plaintiff had already been sufficiently alleged, and, in so far as. it allege© ah offer 'by a third party of security to

Mr. Justice Bronson dissented, and delivered the following opinion: The defendant attempts to justify the imprisonment by virtue of a judgment and execution, without showing that he acquired jurisdiction over the person of the plaintiff. The plea does not allege that the plaintiff appeared before the justice, nor that he was a resident of the county of Tompkins at the time the summons issued. As the action was not upon cont

The action is ejectment for a piece of quarry land in the town of Pittsford. The defendant's answer contains the general issue and asserts title by adverse possession. The trial below was before a referee, on whose report judgment was rendered for the recovery of a part, only, of the premises in question. The plaintiff brings the case here on exceptions. The case was argued in this Court at the May Term, 1923, and when, at our last May Term, an opinion was handed down which reversed and reman

De Angelis, J.: This is a proceeding for the probate of the will of Pasquale Caltabellotta. The appellant filed her petition in the Surrogate’s Court in which she sought to be made a party to the proceeding on the ground that she, instead of the proponent, is the lawful widow of the deceased. The proponent made an application to dismiss the appellant’s petition and the court took the proofs of the respective parties bearing