Cases

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 5th day of November 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of January 2008."

Case reported without published opinion affirmed.

658 S.E.2d 483 (2008) Tom I. DAVIS, II, Co-Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Kyle Davis (Deceased); and Bobby Buff, Co-Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Kyle Davis (Deceased) v. SGT. PEPPERS RESTAURANT AND BAR, INC.; O'Charley's, Inc.; John S. Brown; Gregory A. Brown; and Terry C. Brown. No. 535P07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 24, 2008. Forres

650 S.E.2d 66 (2007) DAVIS v. SGT. PEPPERS RESTAURANT AND BAR, INC. No. COA06-1469. Court of appeals of North Carolina. Filed September 18, 2007. Certification Date October 8, 2007. Case reported without published opinion affirmed.

Appellate Case: 23-3112 Document: 88-1 Date Filed: 05/30/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 30, 2025

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., BROWN and PADGETT, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules De

PER CURIAM. We reverse the order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The state concedes error based on the recent decision of Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993). This cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to correct appellant’s sentence. On remand, appellant’s sentence imposed under Count II shall continue

CARROLL, J. ¶ 1. Defendant Jeffrey Davis appeals his conviction for financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult under 13 V.S.A. § 1380(a) following a jury trial. He raises four arguments on appeal. His first two arguments arise from the trial court's denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal and the sufficiency of the State's evidence. He also argues that the court's instruction

276 P.3d 148 (2012) STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Antwan T. PEPPERS, Appellant. No. 101,551. Supreme Court of Kansas. May 4, 2012. *152 Lydia Krebs, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Jason E. Geier, assistant district attorney, argued the cause, and Darren E. Root, as

KEVIN GROSS, U.S.B.J. The issue before the Court is jurisdiction. Does the Court which presided over Debtors'1 Chapter 11 bankruptcy case and entered the Order which confirmed the plan of liquidation have jurisdiction to decide a post-confirmation dispute in an adversary proceeding? Jurisdiction is the seminal question in every case and sometimes the final question. Here, the Court is satisfied that it has jurisdi

FILED Aug 31 2020, 10:34 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court C

151 Ga. App. 680 (1979) 261 S.E.2d 427 PEPPERS v. SMITH et al. (two cases). 57534, 57535. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Submitted April 4, 1979. Decided October 11, 1979. Frank M. Gleason, John W. Davis, Jr., for appellant. James S. Kilpatrick, Dennis Watson, for appellees. SMITH, Judge. We g

175 S.W.3d 714 (2005) Hugh BRYAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ruth Bryan, Plaintiff, v. Joseph W. PEPPERS, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents. No. 26338. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. November 8, 2005. *715 Steven E. Marsh, Springfield, MO, for Appellant. P

OPINION CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from, inter alia, the District Court’s order dismissing the third amended complaint in five cases: Collette Davis, et al. v. Abington Memorial Hospital, et al., No. 09-cv-05520; Kenneth Lynn, et al. v. Aria Health System, et al., No. 09-cv-05548

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., RICKMAN and PIPKIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NEESE, District Judge. This Court granted the writ of habeas corpus for the production of the petitioner Mr. Peppers to inquire into the right of the prisoner to liberty, notwithstanding any criminal acts he may have committed. An evidentiary hearing was conducted herein on November 12, 1969, and the Court has reserved judgment pending consideration. Th

[Cite as State v. Davis, 2022-Ohio-4767.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-22-1100 L-22-1101 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0201701077

464 S.E.2d 598 (1995) 195 W.Va. 79 STATE of West Virginia, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. Jane DAVIS, Defendant Below, Appellant. No. 22813. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 19, 1995. Decided October 27, 1995. *599 Matthew J. Hayes, Pepper & Nason, Charlest

Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge *651Mr. Ronnie Davis appeals a Buchanan County Circuit Court conviction by a jury for two counts of the class A misdemeanor of sexual abuse in the second degree. Mr. Davis was sentenced to consecutive terms of one year in jail for each count. We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background

882 F.Supp. 1217 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. William M. DAVIS, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-0484 P. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. April 6, 1995. *1218 Lois Schiffer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert E. Maher, Cynthia Huber, Robert H. Oakley, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natu