Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Pennington v. Pennington”
Pennington v. Penningtonpublic domain
80 So.3d 763 (2011) Renee Claire Hasha PENNINGTON v. Christopher PENNINGTON. No. 2011 CA 1022. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. December 21, 2011. Michael S. Walsh, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant Renee Claire Hasha Pennington. *764 Laurie N. Marien, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant/Appellee Christopher
Pennington v. Penningtonpublic domain
Thompson, Justice. Robert Pennington (husband) and Michelle Pennington (wife) were divorced pursuant to a final judgment and decree entered after wife failed to appear for a scheduled final hearing to determine child custody. After the trial court denied wife’s motions to set aside, for new trial, and for reconsideration, she filed an application for discretionary appeal which we granted pursuant to this Court’s Rule 34 (4) re
Pennington v. Penningtonpublic domain
41 So.3d 914 (2010) PENNINGTON v. PENNINGTON. No. 5D09-2672. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. August 10, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
Pennington v. Penningtonpublic domain
971 P.2d 98 (1999) 93 Wash.App. 913 In re the Marriage of Sammi PENNINGTON, a/k/a Evelyn L. Van Pevenage, Respondent, v. Clark M. PENNINGTON, Appellant. No. 21704-0-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. February 5, 1999. *99 Edward Marshall Lane, Tacoma, for Appellant. Michael Joseph McKas
Weber v. Penningtonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2025 ND 105 Casey Joe Weber, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Mackenzie Beth Pennington, Defendant and Appellant No. 20240323 Appeal from the District Court of Eddy County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel D. Narum, Judge. AFFIRMED. Opinion of the Court by
State v. Penningtonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Pennington, 2024-Ohio-5681.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ATHENS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 23CA12 v. : JUSTIN A. PENNINGTON, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Defendant-App
Pennington v. Penningtonpublic domain
Tom Glaze, Justice. This case, a chancery court appeal, was precipitated by an earlier circuit court case filed by Harvest Foods, Inc. against Don Pennington. In that case, Harvest Foods alleged that Pennington, Harvest Foods’ CEO, and others collusively schemed to increase the price of Harvest Foods’ products and that they wrongfully diverted part of those increased prices into an account held
Dawn Marie Pennington v. Joel David Pennington, IIIpublic domain
02/01/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 1, 2023 DAWN MARIE PENNINGTON v. JOEL DAVID PENNINGTON, III Appeal from the Chancery Court for Henry County No. 25408 Bruce Irwin Griffey, Judge ___________________________________
Pennington v. Penningtonpublic domain
By Judge John E. Wetsel, Jr. This case came before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss this case on the ground that the Plaintiff did not file her appeal from the Juvenile Court to this court within the time prescribed by law. Upon consideration of the record in this case and the memoranda of counsel, the Court makes the following [findings and rulings]. I. Findings of Fact
Pennington v. Penningtonpublic domain
BAKER, Judge. Respondent-appellant Robert C. Penning ton (Bob) appeals that portion of his marriage dissolution decree pertaining to a restriction placed upon his visitation rights with his nine-year-old son, Nathan. Bob asserts the trial court abused its discretion by ordering that Bob's adult male friend not be present during overnight visitations. We affirm. FACTS Bob and petitioner
State v. Penningtonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Pennington, 2024-Ohio-2020.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLINTON COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NOS. CA2023-11-020 CA2023-11-021 : - vs -
v. Penningtonpublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
United States v. PENNINGTONpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and BURGTORF Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Wesley L. PENNINGTON Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
Tony Jerome Pennington v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ September 15, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A26A0203. TONY JEROME PENNINGTON v. THE STATE. Tony Jerome Pennington filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order revoking his probation. However, an application for discretionary appeal is required to appeal an order revoking probation. OCGA §
State v. Penningtonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Pennington, 2021-Ohio-3365.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-200358 TRIAL NO. B-1101474 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. : O P I N I O N. WILLIAM PENNINGTON,
Christina Marie Pennington v. Corey Alan Penningtonpublic domain
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CHRISTINA MARIE PENNINGTON, also known FOR PUBLICATION as CHRISTINA MARIE JACKSON, September 12, 2019
Pennington v. Ticepublic domain
Rufe, District Judge. *581Pro se Petitioner Deandre Pennington has filed objections to the conclusion of the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") filed by United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski that his Petition for habeas corpus relief under § 2254 is untimely. For the reasons that follow, the Court will overrule the obje
Pennington v. Statepublic domain
306 Ga. 854 FINAL COPY S18G1495. PENNINGTON v. THE STATE. ELLINGTON, Justice. Following a jury trial, Charles Lee Pennington and Jay Harlan Briele were found guilty of possessing with intent to distribute methamphetamine within 1,000 feet of an elementary school, in violation of OCGA § 16-13-32.4 (a).1 At trial, Pennington and Briele requested that the jury be instructed on an affirmative defense provided in the Georgia Controlled Substances Act,2 specifically,
Musick v. Penningtonpublic domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS April 26, 2021 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
Pennington v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DAVID PENNINGTON, § § No. 253, 2019 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below–Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, §