⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Penelope J. Schultz”

Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985-07-31 · Published · cited 17× · 372 N.W.2d 238; 1985 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1099
372 N.W.2d 238 (1985) FARMERS SAVINGS BANK, JOICE, Iowa, Appellee, v. Charles F. GERHART, Penelope J. Gerhart, and Chaspen Corporation, Appellants. No. 84-823. Supreme Court of Iowa. July 31, 1985. Rehearing Denied September 19, 1985. *239 Mark S. Soldat, Algona, for appellants. Fred J. Haas of Humphrey &a;
Lamle v. Eadspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-04-09 · Published · cited 6× · 134 F.4th 562
Appellate Case: 24-6124 Document: 59 Date Filed: 04/09/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit April 9, 2025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997-08-14 · Published · cited 18× · 974 F. Supp. 459; 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 46; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12078; 1997 WL 471817
974 F.Supp. 459 (1997) Michael BOWERS, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 97-2600. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 14, 1997. *460 Barbara E. Ransom, Philadelphia, PA, Penelope A. Boyd, Mount Laurel, NJ, Richard L. Bazelon, Bazelon & Less, Marlton, NJ, fo
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-07-18 · Published · cited 808× · 829 F.3d 926; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13091; 2016 WL 3878219
*929LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Marcus Hensley suffered a serious knee injury while deployed by the United States Army in Iraq combat in 2005. In September 2007, he underwent right knee surgery, and the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) awarded him benefits for service-connected disability. He then applied for Social Security disability insurance benefits, claiming as sev
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009-05-11 · Published · cited 165× · 565 F.3d 753; 178 Oil & Gas Rep. 229; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10081; 2009 WL 1298691
565 F.3d 753 (2009) M.D. MARK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. KERR-McGEE CORPORATION; Oryx Energy Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos. 08-1040, 08-1047, 08-1236. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 11, 2009. *755 Marie R. Yeates of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., Houston, TX, (Penelope E.
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998-06-08 · Published · cited 67× · 9 F. Supp. 2d 460; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8552; 1998 WL 300552
9 F.Supp.2d 460 (1998) Michael BOWERS, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, ACT, INC., NCAA Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse, Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education, University of Iowa, American International College, Defendants. No. Civ. A. 97-2600. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 8, 1998.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 10, 2009 MAURICE DARNELL TYLER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2003-A-432 J. Randall Wyatt, Jr., Judge No. M2008-02199-CCA-R3-PC - Filed May 21, 2010 Petitioner, Maurice Darnell Tyler, was convicted of two counts of first degree murder
Samuel v. Barnhartpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003-12-23 · Published · cited 11× · 295 F. Supp. 2d 926; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23380; 2003 WL 23100300
295 F.Supp.2d 926 (2003) Steven A. SAMUEL, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. 02-C-0569. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. December 23, 2003. *927 *928 Nora Sheehan Barry, Penelope C Fleming, U.S. Dept. of Justice (ED-
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013-10-04 · Published · cited 126× · 732 F.3d 382; 2013 WL 5493964
Case: 12-40914 Document: 00512395979 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/03/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2013 No. 12-4091
Schramek v. Bohrenpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988-07-12 · Published · cited 23× · 429 N.W.2d 501; 145 Wis. 2d 695; 1988 Wisc. App. LEXIS 597
145 Wis.2d 695 (1988) 429 N.W.2d 501 Sue SCHRAMEK and Stacy Schramek, by Robert E. Sutton, her guardian ad litem, Plaintiffs-Appellants,[†] v. Michael O. BOHREN, Thomas R. Schramek, Robert Schramek, Joseph Greco and Steven J. May, Defendants-Respondents. No. 87-1831. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs April 26, 1988. <
Vultaggio v. Yaskopublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998-01-16 · Published · cited 29× · 572 N.W.2d 450; 215 Wis. 2d 326; 1998 Wisc. LEXIS 4
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. ¶ 49. {dissenting). The question certified to this court is whether the statements of witnesses at legislative proceedings are entitled to absolute or conditional privilege for purposes of defamation law. To this certified question the majority answers an unpredictable "Maybe." ¶ 50. Although at the outset the majority opinion purports to hold that testimony at a legislative procee
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2006-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 22, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MAURICE DARNELL TYLER Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2003-A-432 J. Randall Wyatt, Jr., Judge No. M2005-00500-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 1, 2006 This is a direct appeal as of right from convictions entered on a j
Vittands v. Sudduthpublic domain
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000-06-15 · Published · cited 89× · 49 Mass. App. Ct. 401; 730 N.E.2d 325
Lenk, J. Pro se defendant Judith Sudduth, also plaintiff-in-counterclaim, contends that a Superior Court judge erred in granting summary judgment on her counterclaims for abuse of process and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and in denying her costs under the Declaratory Judgment Act, G. L. c. 231A, and Mass.R.Civ.P. 11(a), 365 Mass. 753 (1974). The plaintiffs, also defendants-in-counterclaim, appeal from the denial
District Court, D. Nebraska · 2010-07-14 · Published · cited 1× · 724 F. Supp. 2d 1025; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70484; 2010 WL 2773437
724 F.Supp.2d 1025 (2010) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF the HEARTLAND and Dr. Jill L. Meadows, Plaintiffs, v. Dave HEINEMAN, Governor of Nebraska, in his official capacity; Jon Bruning, Attorney General of Nebraska; in his official capacity; Kerry Winterer, Chief Executive Officer, and Dr. Joann Schaefer, Director of the Division of Public Health, Nebraska Department of Health and Services, in their official capacities; and Crystal Higgins, President, Ne
Schmitz v. Yantpublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 1965-12-31 · Published · cited 14× · 409 P.2d 346; 242 Or. 308; 1965 Ore. LEXIS 354
242 Or. 308 (1965) 409 P.2d 346 SCHMITZ v. YANT ET UX Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued December 3, 1965. Reversed and remanded with instructions December 31, 1965. *309 Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause *310 for appellants. With him on the brief were H
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-14-00544-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 5/11/2015 10:04:41 AM
District Court, S.D. New York · 2001-08-09 · Published · cited 30× · 155 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11568; 2001 WL 901242
155 F.Supp.2d 1 (2001) TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MARVEL ENTERPRISES, INC., Tribune Entertainment Co., Fireworks Communications, Inc., and Fireworks Television (US) Inc., Defendants. Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Defendant. Nos. 01 CIV. 3016(AGS), 01 CIV. 3017(AGS). United States District Court, S.D. New Yo