Cases

SMITH, Chief Judge. These consolidated mandamus petitions require us to decide whether two professional photographers bringing separate copyright infringement actions are bound by a forum selection clause in contracts they did not sign. We conclude that the photographers are not bound because they are not intended beneficiaries of the agreements, nor are they closely related parties.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 14, 2012 Session THE TOWN OF PEGRAM v. CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT, LLC ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Cheatham County No. 12946 Robert E. Burch, Judge No. M2011-01536-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 12, 2012 Town of Pegram appeals from the trial court’s decision awarding it no d

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: In this employment discrimination case, appellant Ron L. Pegram (“Pegram”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer Honeywell, Inc., (“Honeywell”) dismissing Pegram’s claims of racial and disability discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2003) and the Texas Commission for Human Rights Act (“TCHRA”), TE

LOUIS L. STANTON, U.S.D.J. *295Plaintiff Landol Fletcher brought this putative class action, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, against Defendants for violations of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff's claims for lack of class standing and failure to state a

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. Once the concept of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) gained acceptance in the early 1970s, their numbers grew rapidly. See Steven F. Freedman, Effects of ESOP Adoption and Employee Ownership: Thirty years of Research and Experience, 2007 University of Pennsylvania Dynamics Working Papers, # 07-01 (January 10, 2007), posted at http:// repo

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1286 IN RE: FIDELITY ERISA FEE LITIGATION ANDRE W. WONG, on behalf of the T-Mobile USA, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan and Trust and on behalf of all other similarly situated Employee Benefit Plans; JANICE ANDERSEN; JASON BAILIS; NATALIE DONALDSON; CYNTHIA EDDY; MYRL JEFFCOAT; THOMAS GOODRICH; KAYLA JONES; KAREN PETTUS; GINA SUMMERS; HEATHER WOODHOUSE; REGI

140 Nev., Advance Opinion I LI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, A No. 79658 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, D/B/A CENTENNIAL HILLS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant, vs. FILED DWAYNE ANTHONY MURRAY, INDIVIDU

Reena Raggi, Circuit Judge: *217In this civil action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(2) and (a)(3), the named plaintiffs, acting on behalf of a putative class o

PERREN, J. *406*1268An injured plaintiff with health insurance may not recover economic damages that exceed the amount paid by the insurer for the medical *1269

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CASA DEL CAFFE VERGNANO S.P.A., No. 13-56091 a corporation organized under the laws of the Italian Republic; CAFFE D.C. No. VERGNANO USA CORP., a Delaware 3:12-cv-00655- Corporation, JAH (DHB) Petitioners-Appellees, v. OPINION ITALFLAVORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability compan

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID BRIONES, Senior District Judge. On this day, the Court considered Defendants Albertsons, LLC (“Albertsons”) and Antonio Labrado’s (“Mr. Labrado”) (collectively, “Defendants”) “Motion for Summary Judgment” (“Motion”), filed in the above-captioned cause on June 14, 2013. Therein, Defendants ask the Court to enter summary judgment against Plaintiff Arturo Villega

GREG KAYS, CHIEF JUDGE This case involves claims for breach of fiduciary duty and prohibited transactions pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs Steve Wildman ("Wildman") and Jon Borcherding ("Borcherding"), participants in the America

RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JAMES J. BRADY, District Judge. This case is before the Court on two cross-motions for. summary judgment. Defendant Illinois Union Insurance Company (Illinois Union) filed the first motion (Doc. 298), and plaintiff Louisiana Generating LLC (LA Gen) filed the second (Doc. 327). Both parties filed oppositions (Docs. 337, 341) and replied .to the other party’

405 B.R. 68 (2009) In re STONE BARN MANHATTAN LLC, f/k/a Steve & Barry's LLC, et al., Debtors. No. 08-12579 (ALG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. May 22, 2009. *70 Silverman Acampora LLP, by Adam L. Rosen, Esq., Robert Nosek, Esq., Jericho, NY, for the Debtors. Reed Smith LLP, by Alexander Terras, Esq., Debra S

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS GREG KAYS, CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This case involves claims for breach of fiduciary duty brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs Steve Wildman (“Wildman”) and Jon Borcherding (“Bor-cherding”), participants in the American Century Retirement Plan (the “Plan”

793 F.Supp.2d 964 (2011) Deborah PATTON, Plaintiff, v. ECARDIO DIAGNOSTICS LLC, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-10-1847. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. June 9, 2011. *965 Peter Costea, Attorney at Law, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Marshall J. Horton, Matthew Luke Hoeg, Andrews Kurth LLP, Houston,

347 S.W.3d 855 (2011) ALLEGIANCE HILLVIEW, L.P., Appellant, v. RANGE TEXAS PRODUCTION, LLC and Range Production Company, Appellees. No. 02-10-00062-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. July 28, 2011. *857 Brown McCarroll LLP and Richard Illmer, John C. Pegram, Dallas, Elizabeth G. Bloch, Austin, for Appellant. Harris

DEBORAH A. BATTS, United States District Judge This Action involves a dispute between an Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") beneficiary and her spouse's employer, health benefits plan, and insurance administrator over prescription drug coverage. At issue is whether the administrator's refusal to cover a prescription for fentanyl violates the mandates of ERISA, Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, the Equal

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-371C (Filed: June 8, 2020) ************************************* CSS, LLC, * * Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC Plaintiff, * 12(b)(6); Jurisdiction; Standing; Direct * Claims;

PAUL A. CROTTY, United States District Judge The action concerns an aircraft lease which guaranteed the aircraft's minimum market value, the Residual Value Guarantee ("RVG"), at the end of lease term, subject to certain conditions. Plaintiff Embraer S.A. ("Embraer") entered into the lease with a party whose rights in the agreement were subsequently transferred to Defendant, Dougherty Air Trustee, LLC ("Dougherty"). Complaint, Verde