Cases

Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jerome C. Murphy, J.), entered July 2, 2013. The order granted the motion of the defendants Putney Twombly Hall & Hirson, LLP, William M. Poliak, and Philip H. Kalban pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. In 1952

Lynx Asset Servs., LLC v Nestor (2022 NY Slip Op 06170) Lynx Asset Servs., LLC v Nestor 2022 NY Slip Op 06170 Decided on November 03, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud

Nestor v Public Adm'r of Nassau County (2022 NY Slip Op 05374) Nestor v Public Adm'r of Nassau County 2022 NY Slip Op 05374 Decided on September 29, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

—Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered April 13, 1994, which dismissed appeals from two orders of the Civil Court, New York County (Howard Malatzky, J.), dated April 2, 1991 and May 5, 1992, and reversed a final judgment of that same court and Judge, entered May 5, 1992, awarding possession of the subject apartment to petitioners and, on appeal, dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

OPINION OF THE COURT Gerald Lebovits, J. Respondent, Thomas Britt, an interior designer, is a rent-stabilized tenant at 15 East 63rd Street, a five-story residential townhouse located between Fifth and Madison avenues near Central Park in New York county. The subject apartment, featured in Architectural Digest magazine several times, is a 3,000-square-foot triplex apartment. Petitioners, Marianne Nestor, wid

Gemeaux Ltd. v William Doyle Galleries Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 06084) Gemeaux Ltd. v William Doyle Galleries Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 06084 Decided on November 01, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reportin

Gemeaux Ltd. v William Doyle Galleries Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 06084) Gemeaux Ltd. v William Doyle Galleries Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 06084 Decided on November 01, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reportin

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shorter, J.), entered June 28, 1985, granting the motion of defendants-respondents Marianne and Peggy Nestor for leave to reargue and renew and, upon reargument and renewal, vacating its prior order entered on November 23, 1984 denying plaintiff Lisa Roggli’s motion for a preliminary injunction to restrain the Nestors from commencing proceedings to evict *443he

Andrews, Judge. While William Oursler, Jr., was a social guest at Robert and Peggy Thompson’s house, he was standing on a wooden deck attached to the side of the house when the deck suddenly detached from the house and collapsed. Oursler sued the Thompsons claiming that injuries he suffered when the deck collapsed were proximately caused by the Thompsons’ negligent failure to inspect and maintain the deck in a safe condition

Matter of Cassini (2020 NY Slip Op 01054) Matter of Cassini 2020 NY Slip Op 01054 Decided on February 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

Matter of Cassini (2020 NY Slip Op 01055) Matter of Cassini 2020 NY Slip Op 01055 Decided on February 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I

WILKINS, Circuit Judge: David Patchak brought this suit under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 702, 705, challenging the authority of the Department of the Interior to take tjtle to a particular tract of land under the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA), 25 U.S.C. § 465. The land, called the Bradley Property, had been put into trust for the use of the Match-E-Be-Nash-She

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Appellant Deborah Hill appeals from the February 6, 2007, order of the Perry County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, which found Brenda Hill to be the surviving spouse of Daniel Hill. {¶ 2} Appellant Deborah Hill had petitioned the Probate Court for an order determining that she was the next of kin/surviving spouse of

723 P.2d 982 (1986) Eugene GOLDEN and Alvin Hinkle, Petitioners, v. The OKFUSKEE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD; Claud Evans, Chairman; Juanita Cowans, Secretary; and Peggy Wilson, Member, Respondent. No. 66983. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. August 4, 1986. As Corrected August 5, 1986. Harold Health, Daugherty & Heath, Haldenville, for petitioners. J

Matter of Cassini (2020 NY Slip Op 01057) Matter of Cassini 2020 NY Slip Op 01057 Decided on February 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Scheinkman, P.J., J. Published b

Plaintiff, James R.L. Ruscilli, through his next friend and guardian Deborah K. Niple Ruscilli, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Probate Court, which granted summary judgment to defendants, Louis G. Ruscilli, both individually and as trustee of decedent Robert A. Ruscilli's 1982 insurance trust, Ruscilli Construction Company, Inc., and Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company. The trial court thus held that plaintiff was not entitled to any benefits from the irrevocable trust set up b

297 F.Supp. 821 (1969) OLEG CASSINI, INC., Plaintiff, v. COUTURE COORDINATES, INC., Isadore Dion and Charles Coen, Defendants. No. 69 Civ. 26. United States District Court S. D. New York. March 6, 1969. *822 *823 Booth, Lipton & Lipton, New York City, for plaintiff; Donald S. Engel, New Yo

HENLEY, Circuit Judge. These consolidated appeals are from orders of various district court judges granting motions for summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. In all of these appeals, appellants are urging (1) that the former Sections 474.060 and 474.070 of the Missouri Statutes unconstitutionally discriminate on the basis of legitimacy and sex under Trimble v. Gordon, 430 U.S. 762, 9